Stanimir Markov

3.9K posts

Stanimir Markov banner
Stanimir Markov

Stanimir Markov

@sferk

Principal Product Manager @Dynatrace ex @Runecast CEO

Czech Republic เข้าร่วม Mayıs 2008
714 กำลังติดตาม929 ผู้ติดตาม
Stanimir Markov รีทวีตแล้ว
Kristin Raworth 🇨🇦
Kristin Raworth 🇨🇦@KristinRaworth·
I've never sen anything more accurate
English
671
47.2K
224.7K
8.8M
Stanimir Markov รีทวีตแล้ว
Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
VI. The Deepest Problem: Wants Are Infinite, Time Is Finite The most fundamental reason the lump-of-labor fallacy fails — in its AGI application as in all prior applications — is that human wants are effectively infinite and human time is absolutely finite. Even in a world where AGI can produce every good and service at near-zero cost, humans will still want things that are irreducibly scarce: other humans’ time and attention. A massage from another human. A meal cooked with love by a person who cares. A conversation with someone who genuinely listens. Live performance. Mentorship. Friendship. Community. Spiritual guidance. Teaching that is responsive to a specific child’s specific needs in real time. These things cannot be AGI-produced without losing the very quality that makes them valuable, because the value is constituted by the human origin. As AGI drives down the price of machine-produced goods and services, it increases the relative scarcity and therefore the relative value of genuine human connection and human time. The inevitable long-run consequence of AGI is not mass unemployment. It’s a massive repricing of human time upward, with employment shifting toward the domains where human presence is the product — and the expansion of service, care, craft, performance, and connection sectors to a scale that would dwarf current employment in those areas. Conclusion The AGI unemployment catastrophism is the Luddite fallacy wearing a PhD. It makes the same structural error every previous generation of technological catastrophists made — treating the quantity of work as fixed, ignoring the demand-creation and productivity-feedback mechanisms, conflating transitional friction with structural permanence, and ignoring comparative advantage and complementarity effects. The lump of labor fallacy is not a fringe economic insight. It is one of the most robustly empirically validated and theoretically grounded propositions in all of economics. The economy is not a fixed pie. Technology that increases productive capacity increases the size of the pie, and bigger pies employ more people doing more differentiated and higher-value work. AGI will disrupt. It will displace. It will create extraordinary transitional friction in specific occupations and geographies. It will reward people who adapt quickly and punish people who don’t. It will reshape the composition of employment radically. All of that is true and worth taking seriously. What it will not do — cannot do, given the basic logic of how market economies work — is produce permanent structural mass unemployment. The people making that argument are making a claim that has been empirically falsified ten times in a row over 250 years, grounded in a logical error that every serious economist since Bastiat has recognized as a fallacy. The burden of proof is entirely on them to explain what mechanism, precisely, breaks the demand-creation feedback loop that has operated without failure through every prior technological revolution in history. And “AGI is really really powerful this time” is not a mechanism. It’s just the Luddites in better clothes.
English
54
16
174
35.9K
Stanimir Markov รีทวีตแล้ว
European Commission
European Commission@EU_Commission·
We are introducing EU Inc. To make building and growing a business across the EU faster, simpler, and smarter. 🔸 Start a company in less than 48 hours 🔸 No minimum capital requirement 🔸 Fully online and borderless
European Commission tweet media
English
624
1.2K
7.5K
2.3M
Stanimir Markov รีทวีตแล้ว
Andrej Karpathy
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy·
Agency > Intelligence I had this intuitively wrong for decades, I think due to a pervasive cultural veneration of intelligence, various entertainment/media, obsession with IQ etc. Agency is significantly more powerful and significantly more scarce. Are you hiring for agency? Are we educating for agency? Are you acting as if you had 10X agency? Grok explanation is ~close: “Agency, as a personality trait, refers to an individual's capacity to take initiative, make decisions, and exert control over their actions and environment. It’s about being proactive rather than reactive—someone with high agency doesn’t just let life happen to them; they shape it. Think of it as a blend of self-efficacy, determination, and a sense of ownership over one’s path. People with strong agency tend to set goals and pursue them with confidence, even in the face of obstacles. They’re the type to say, “I’ll figure it out,” and then actually do it. On the flip side, someone low in agency might feel more like a passenger in their own life, waiting for external forces—like luck, other people, or circumstances—to dictate what happens next. It’s not quite the same as assertiveness or ambition, though it can overlap. Agency is quieter, more internal—it’s the belief that you *can* act, paired with the will to follow through. Psychologists often tie it to concepts like locus of control: high-agency folks lean toward an internal locus, feeling they steer their fate, while low-agency folks might lean external, seeing life as something that happens *to* them.”
Garry Tan@garrytan

Intelligence is on tap now so agency is even more important

English
2K
9.4K
49.9K
11.2M
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
If AI solves all problems, what will give us meaning?
English
2.8K
251
5.6K
1.1M
Stanimir Markov รีทวีตแล้ว
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
ZXX
11.9K
49.1K
284.8K
50M
Stanimir Markov รีทวีตแล้ว
Runecast
Runecast@Runecast·
🔔 We’re looking forward to the next #RuneTalk #Meetup. See you tomorrow at 18:00 at Alterna Music Bar (Kounicova 506/48, Brno, Czech Republic). 🔔 Read more and secure your last-minute spot: hubs.ly/Q02jjsRd0
Runecast tweet media
English
0
3
4
224
Stanimir Markov รีทวีตแล้ว
Runecast
Runecast@Runecast·
We're excited to share Runecast 6.9 🎉, which introduces even more enhancements for agentless scanning. Let’s dive in and explore what’s new! hubs.li/Q02l8scD0
Runecast tweet media
English
1
3
4
203
Stanimir Markov รีทวีตแล้ว
Runecast
Runecast@Runecast·
Webinar 📢 Secure & Compliant Workloads Anywhere (deutsche) 🗓️ 15. Februar 2024, 11:00-12:00 CET 🎙️ Veranstaltet von der @PriantoGmbH, mit Vural Aybar, Runecast Sales Director 🛡️ #GRC/#Compliance für #DORA, #BSI, #TISAX und mehr 🔒 ➡️ Jetzt anmelden: hubs.li/Q02hnw0W0
Runecast tweet media
Deutsch
0
3
5
197
Stanimir Markov รีทวีตแล้ว
Runecast
Runecast@Runecast·
We are excited to announce the first session for our upcoming #RuneTalk meetup by Vasile Papp and Aylin Sali (@V4Virtual). They’ll delve into ethical cloning and non-invasive deep scanning, where they'll redefine system administration. Secure your spot: hubs.li/Q02jrQ6p0
Runecast tweet media
English
0
2
2
148
Stanimir Markov รีทวีตแล้ว
Runecast
Runecast@Runecast·
We invite you to join us in #Brno, Czechia, as we continue our #RuneTalk meetups with an evening of tech talks about Ethical Security Scanning Methods. Find out more and secure your space: hubs.li/Q02jrGXL0
Runecast tweet media
English
0
3
4
227
Stanimir Markov รีทวีตแล้ว
Runecast
Runecast@Runecast·
Runecast is proud to announce the winners of our annual Partner Awards for 2023! 🎉🏆 hubs.li/Q02jlxgN0 Congrats to idicos GmbH, Prianto Polska, Xtravirt, Qdevelopers, Axoft Bilisim and SVA! Thank you for being invaluable partners on this amazing journey!
Runecast tweet media
English
0
3
5
293
Stanimir Markov รีทวีตแล้ว
Runecast
Runecast@Runecast·
We’re excited to announce that we’ve signed a definitive agreement to be acquired by @Dynatrace, the leader in unified observability and security. 🎉 Learn more in our press release here: hubs.li/Q02h-ryv0
Runecast tweet media
English
3
11
34
3.4K