Subcircle 🔻

18.2K posts

Subcircle 🔻 banner
Subcircle 🔻

Subcircle 🔻

@subcircle

Brighton based graphic designer. Politics. Memes. Musings. Fully paid-up member of Antifa. Not a Back Street Boy. (he/him). https://t.co/myKvIsu3qM

London / New York / Brighton เข้าร่วม Mayıs 2007
4.4K กำลังติดตาม4.8K ผู้ติดตาม
Subcircle 🔻
Subcircle 🔻@subcircle·
@providence_wire 2016 was a mistake. Electing him a second time in 2024 was an act of massive self-destruction.
English
0
0
0
5
JLM †
JLM †@providence_wire·
Electing Donald Trump in 2024 was a massive mistake.
English
505
225
2.4K
39.4K
Subcircle 🔻
Subcircle 🔻@subcircle·
@TheMG3D Skyrim. I actually bought it a second time when it was released in VR, which was about as close to being the first time playing it as it gets.
English
0
0
0
26
Michael
Michael@TheMG3D·
What game do you wish you could play for the first time again?
English
102
5
88
4.9K
Subcircle 🔻
Subcircle 🔻@subcircle·
No one gives a shit about your promotional tweet in your banger.
English
0
0
0
27
Matthew Zeitlin
Matthew Zeitlin@MattZeitlin·
old people: what was michael jackson's public image in the 90s before the child abuse allegations. was he considered werid but in a kind of harmless eccentric way?
English
398
56
11.9K
1.2M
Subcircle 🔻
Subcircle 🔻@subcircle·
@IterIntellectus Blue voters will vote in the interest of others. They also likely couldn’t live with themselves if people died because of their actions.
English
1
0
0
327
Subcircle 🔻
Subcircle 🔻@subcircle·
@waitbutwhy This explains the political left/right issue to a tee. Which is why we can’t have nice things.
English
0
0
0
5
Tim Urban
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy·
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
English
4.8K
1.1K
8.9K
15.3M
skooks
skooks@skooookum·
We need a slur for people who wear backpacks
English
829
76
2K
326.1K
hacky sack
hacky sack@h4ckys4ck·
@thisstuartlaws One I actually use is “They’re trying to rice your roast” It’s after a friend went to another friends house for a roast dinner and they’d substituted the mash for plain boiled rice. It basically means that someone is out to damage you
English
10
1
245
41.7K
Stuart Laws
Stuart Laws@thisstuartlaws·
I’ve been casually slipping in fake British sayings and words into conversation with my American partner - here’s the one’s she believes:
English
318
364
26K
3.6M
Subcircle 🔻
Subcircle 🔻@subcircle·
@daniellismore It’s important to remember that it wasn’t just racists who voted for Brexit. Cunts did, too.
English
0
0
0
28
Daniel Lismore
Daniel Lismore@daniellismore·
🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿☕️🫖 NIGEL FARAGE IS THE REASON YOU’RE ANGRY ABOUT IMMIGRATION You’ve been listening to Nigel Farage complain about immigration for years. Here’s what he doesn’t tell you. The Dublin III Accord was an EU agreement that allowed the UK to return asylum seekers to the first safe EU country they entered. If someone arrived in the UK via France, we could send them back to France under Dublin III. It worked. It gave us control. It was our legal right as an EU member. Brexit destroyed it. The moment we left the EU, we lost access to Dublin III. We can no longer return asylum seekers to EU countries. They stay here because we have nowhere to send them back to. Who campaigned for Brexit? Nigel Farage. Boris Johnson. The Brexit Party. David Cameron called the referendum. They told you Brexit would solve immigration. They told you we’d “take back control.” They lied. Brexit removed the one mechanism we had to manage asylum claims effectively. Dublin III let us return people to safe EU countries. We don’t have that anymore. The boats increased after Brexit. Not before. After. Because the legal route to return people disappeared the day we left the EU. Nigel Farage campaigned to leave the EU. He got what he wanted. And now he campaigns on the immigration crisis his own policy created. He caused the problem. Then he sold you the anger about it. Then he asked for your vote to “fix” it. This is the con. You’re angry about immigration. You should be. But you’re angry at the wrong people. The person responsible for the immigration situation you hate is the person asking for your vote to fix it. Nigel Farage destroyed the Dublin III agreement when he pushed for Brexit. Everything that’s happened since is the consequence of that choice. Vote tactically May 7. Stop giving power to the people who created the problem. Nigel lies to you because he thinks you like getting angry and will vote for him in return even though he is the reason you are angry. I want you vote for him. He’ll remove more of your rights and money. He doesn’t care about you. I’ve met him, I know. 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿☕️🫖
Daniel Lismore tweet media
English
285
1.3K
2.2K
36.1K
Subcircle 🔻
Subcircle 🔻@subcircle·
@daniellismore @jd4679 We tried to tell them that this would happen after Brexit. They didn’t care, and still don’t. They blame everything else except their own actions. And so we all get the lay in the bed they shat in.
English
0
0
1
56
Claire 💙
Claire 💙@clairebubblepop·
Said this before but I’ll say it again. Just one lifetime ago in the UK, our fathers could buy a home, buy a car, have 3 to 4 children, wives could stay home, take annual vacations, and then retire… all on one middle-class salary. What happened?
English
2.4K
993
9.5K
424.9K
Anon Opin.
Anon Opin.@anon_opin·
If you know someone complaining about RAM shortages, show them Treasure Island Dizzy (48K) and tell them to stop bloody moaning. Insatiable consumption is the problem, not shortages.
English
15
5
101
16.3K
RN
RN@Just_Saxon·
@subcircle @mymyxmu @clairebubblepop said i don’t care about your name calling, pattern recognition with groups and wanting to preserve your people isn’t a bad thing
English
1
0
0
10
Subcircle 🔻
Subcircle 🔻@subcircle·
@Just_Saxon @mymyxmu @clairebubblepop I didn't mention 'hurt feelings'. I didn't mention the word 'natzi'. You are projecting. I pointed out that reducing whole groups to a ‘burden’ isn’t a serious use of data. You’re taking a snapshot of averages and turning it into a fixed conclusion about people. That’s the issue
English
1
0
0
22
RN
RN@Just_Saxon·
@subcircle @mymyxmu @clairebubblepop you’re the one who tried to bring up hurt feelings when i was categorising groups with data “oooo we could end up like the nazis” such a terrible argument
English
1
0
0
8
Subcircle 🔻
Subcircle 🔻@subcircle·
@Just_Saxon @mymyxmu @clairebubblepop That chart reflects who is earning more at that point in time. Groups with younger populations or lower average income will appear as net recipients. That’s how a redistributive system works, it’s not evidence of inherent ‘burden’.
English
1
0
0
14
RN
RN@Just_Saxon·
@subcircle @mymyxmu @clairebubblepop well actually if you scroll down to this chart you’ll see white as a group are firmly in the net contributor section and every other group is in the net benefits section, apart from asian which is around the middle as it’s not split into sub groups, (chinese, bengali etc)
RN tweet media
English
1
0
0
22