thrill

@indystryfilms @CBSMornings either way its a disservice to yourself, the art form, or the next generation.

@indystryfilms @CBSMornings I would never advise a young artist to utilize AI in their workflow because they'd never gain the necessary skills and expertise of the craft. and I'd never advise an existing expert to use it because you'd ultimately be replacing jobs/tasks required for young artisans to learn.

Kane Parsons, the 20-year-old director of the box office-topping film “Backrooms,” is “absolutely not” going to embrace AI, explaining that he doesn’t “see the value in, like, outsourcing” the making of art.

@indystryfilms @CBSMornings you can pretend you're an expert costume designer, and spend spend days toiling over a costume prompt. but if you have no fundamental understanding of why one iteration is good or bad beyond vibes then its going to fall flat, and be called slop.

@indystryfilms @CBSMornings if you've achieved a level of mastery in anything, the take away should be that there is an incredible level of nuance to learn in every field and take years of mastery. once you cede that to AI what you are left with is arbitrary decision making that lack a nuanced understanding

@indystryfilms @CBSMornings the argument you made assumed that you are acutely aware of what is and isn't an "arbitrary' decision. my argument is that an expert of a craft is going to make 1000s of decisions you may otherwise deem arbitrary simply out of ignorance.

Nobody is debating the fact that creating a movie in a room by yourself and a computer is lonely and deprives you of the wonderful feeling that is collaborating with other talented human beings. That wasn't the point I made in the last message but oh well. We were talking about the levels of arbitrary choices that happen to a director vs deliberately choosing every single thing in your frame. I am not in the AI space as my end goal to make films solo but as a place to practice being a shitty storyteller telling bad stories faster so I can maybe one day know enough about telling a story visually that other people want to collaborate with me to make a real film one day.

@indystryfilms @CBSMornings i would argue that a wouldnt trust the judgement of a director to make that call if they cant see the value other artists bring. you dont get any of the movies you love without all of the contributions that together result in something far beyond that of a singular vision.

They don't receive arbitrary chaos but they operate in reality where they aren't controlling every aspect of what makes the frame. Some like Kubrick might be crazy fixated on controlling everything and some other generic director might accept what the first version of something was and move on. The level of intent behind choosing what makes the final frame, like in his case, he mentions someone used generative fill to replace a background, I argue that how much of that background matters to that shot and to the character is important. If its a hero element in the background that you replaced with genAI fill, then you have the choice to keep tweaking it until you get the exact thing you wanted but if it is a random garbage can that didn't look period accurate and you used genAI fill to turn it into period accurate garbage can and accepted the first version that came out, that is completely ok.

@indystryfilms @CBSMornings except directors don't receive arbitrary artistic chaos, they direct a symphony of talented artists each bringing their own artistic decisions and expression with a level of expertise and insight to their craft far beyond what the director could manage alone.

And while I love this guy and backrooms, the fallacy in his argument lies in that very final line. Thinking generative anything = arbitrary. If anyone spends a decent amount of time with it, you realize it is your role as a director to take the arbitrary chaos of art and focus it through the lens of your vision and build your narrative. Whether you take the infinite possibilities of what a 3D cube in Blender could turn into or what the infinite latent space of any genAI model could turn into. As long as YOU decide and not the machine, then you can continue using it as a tool. But yes, the day you accept the arbitrary outcome of any medium of art (throwing paint on a canvas and accepting the outcome AS IS without modifying or changing it to your vision), then you are contributing to slop and not story.

@StatiQfit mfs really out here thinkin they socrates for saying shit like, "dont let your girl fuck someone else, they might leave you."

This man let a nigga with one of the biggest dicks in the world fuck his wife on camera not once but twice, then was foolish enough to fight that nigga and got his ass whooped. It’s no surprise she lost all attraction to him, women will always punish weak men.

@yeehaw214069210 @ImperiumFirst one day you might learn the irony of your statement, sadly...today is not that day

@thrillhouse01 @ImperiumFirst I don’t hate democrats. I hate hypocrisy. They didn’t go balls to the wall and try and didn’t invoke war powers resolution. Cry pussy

“Four republicans betrayed the party” Nigga 207 republicans betrayed the country

@yeehaw214069210 @ImperiumFirst i like how the defense for every fuck wit maga cuck is, "the party I hated and revolted against did it so its cool if we do it."

@ImperiumFirst Was ok when Obama was bombing and sending drones across the Middle East. Yawn

@Camden_Cash @peterk0578 mf hanging on his arm like a koala the fuck you think gonna happen.

@peterk0578 Respectfully disagree. Both players swipe down with their arms. Towns is in his shot motion. Wembanyama is contesting. Contact from both. At that point, it should be a no-call. However, Wemby’s arm follows through and connects with KAT’s face. Clear foul. Call should have stood.

This was originally called a defensive foul on Wembanyama. The Spurs challenged the call and won, and the refs called Towns for the offensive foul here. That’s a bad review, imo. Arms getting tangled up is marginal. The forearm/elbow to the face is not.

@umapalma01 @Racerz86 crying over a mf petting a goat 😂

@Racerz86 this is u doing tricks for a complete stranger

genuinely don't understand why everyone is treating a man who mistreated animals for money like a confused child

@nofacee_b imagine being this performative 😂

@Edsunnn @hanbee_8 i mean hate all you want just have a reason that doesnt make you a retard or a hypocrite its pretty simple 🙂 have a good one

@thrillhouse01 @hanbee_8 lmaooo cuz nobody can hate on ur daddy huh

I do agree this was a bad content idea. I dont think Jason calling Maya had the malicious intent of shoving it in her face. This was just ignorance and stupidity tbh His mind was probably “ANIMALS = MAYA” without really thinking of the negative connotations, so GROSS is too much

@Edsunnn @hanbee_8 "just let me hate on bro for shit i cant be bothered to prove😩" yall got it. actual twitter drone. go read a book or get back in school gang. ur brain aint fully baked yet.

@thrillhouse01 @hanbee_8 he’s not on fucking trial. he’s not going to die because i criticized his actions towards maya and renting a petting zoo. the fact is a majority of petting zoos are harmful - even if it’s not all them. so it’s valid to critique him for renting one. go take a shower

@Edsunnn @hanbee_8 and the fact that you cant seem to comprehend the difference and massive problem between assuming innocence vs assuming guilt is equally horrifying

@Edsunnn @hanbee_8 its what im getting from you assuming jason hired an abusive petting zoo when you have no proof. this is the logical conclusion to that line of thinking. guilty until proven innocent is your stance. the fact that you dont see that as problematic is horrifying.

@Edsunnn @hanbee_8 what you are arguing for is affirmative stat based bias. you've assumed guilt based on statistical analysis..these are the same arguments that lead to racial bias. you are genuinely a full blown unapologetic retard with zero ability to comprehend basic concepts or points of view

@thrillhouse01 @hanbee_8 you went on a tarried about assumptions and now you’re making one because it fits for you to defend jason lmfao whatever bro. keep pulling shit out our ass for someone who doesn’t even know you exist 💀keep acting like a pseudo intellectual lil bro maybe one day you’ll learn

@Edsunnn @hanbee_8 holy fucking reading comprehension. the point is you have no facts bro. you have thrown hate and abuse allegations with partial or assumed information. assuming nothing bad happend based on no other info is the baseline...this is normal human behavior...fucking retard

@Edsunnn @hanbee_8 woj is his producer and is good friends with maya and works with her on events all the time why wouldnt i assume that? the point is you have no facts. i know you're struggling with this concept. but maybe one day you'll understand.

@thrillhouse01 @hanbee_8 because you need everything spelt out for you this article explains exactly why these mobile petting zoos are harmful. if you really think jason took the time to find the one good accredited petting zoo in la then i got a bridge to sell you faunalytics.org/animal-welfare…