Tosoos 71(⋈,🤖)

DEW isn't just a vault — it's a vault framework. We run core vaults on @NEARProtocol today with $NEAR + stables like $USDT and $USDC, but the vision is bigger: → Vaults across any chain → Any team can deploy with Dew infra💧 → Standardized yield architecture, not a single product Read more docs.dew.finance/introduction/o…

BIG ANNOUNCEMENT: Iliad is now FREE. Public beta open to everyone. No subscription. We've built 100 sample skills specifically for @IronClawAI, the MOST secure open-source agent platform running in encrypted enclaves on @near_ai. Sneak peek of the marketplace, currently live on testnet, public release coming soon. Why this matters: IronClaw is what AI agents should have been from day one and Iliad will soon be the fastest way to build for it. Ship NEAR contracts. Build IronClaw skills. One IDE. Stay tuned for more updates and feel free to experiment with beta. - Beta: iliad.codes - Support and feedback: t.me/iliad_near Built by @shadowcorp_dev

IronClaw

GM

@CryptoTony__ NEAR has long been positioned as a fast, scalable L1 with a sharding architecture (Nightshade), good UX, and low fees. They are currently focusing on: AI/agent economy chain abstraction cross-chain intents convenient user onboarding👌

$NEAR is looking interesting Paying attention.

Thanks to Cointelegraph for the feature. Their article framing: "Formal verification is the difficult answer." Long road yes, but AI development is exponential. Let me describe the smart contract model of the future. 1. A contract is defined by a spec, not code. For a DEX, a short set of invariants: value preservation, no unauthorized withdrawals, slippage bounds. The spec goes in first. 2. Code gets uploaded next, verified against the spec on-chain in a dedicated factory, with full proofs. If it satisfies the invariants, it compiles and deploys into the contract. The code can be in any language, or even machine code - doesn't matter. 3. Upgrades are allowed, but only if new code still satisfies the original spec. The contract evolves without breaking its own rules. 4. NEAR is built for this. WASM runtime gives deterministic execution on a formally specified VM - verification can happen at the bytecode level regardless of source language. Native account namespacing lets us reserve *.verified as a protected top-level for spec-compliant contracts. A factory deploys into that namespace only after on-chain proof verification. Users see at a glance what tier they're interacting with. Formal verification, quick primer: instead of testing code against examples (which can miss edge cases), you mathematically prove that the code satisfies a set of properties for ALL possible inputs. If the proof succeeds, the code is guaranteed correct with respect to those properties. No hidden bugs, no missed cases. We can't pay developers 300M to find the vulnerabilities that hackers are already earning 300M exploiting. But we can architect toward a world where hacks become structurally impossible. Formal verification is the path.

RHEA DEX on NEAR has resumed full live operations. To be clear: the DEX itself was never at risk. The temporary pause was a precautionary measure taken to carefully assess transactions linked to the recent exploit and to support the recovery of stolen funds. We appreciate your patience and continued trust as we worked through this process. A full update on RHEA Lending will follow shortly app.rhea.finance

Imho, if you actually want to jump on the “OpenClaw” wave without inheriting the security nightmare, IronClaw is the smarter play: a Rust-based, security-first implementation built around defense in depth, local encrypted data, and auditable execution. github.com/nearai/ironclaw

"Chain abstraction is like wifi; you don't invent your own." Hoskinson praised @NEARProtocol's team and confirmed he's been studying their intents framework and account model closely. His comparison positions NEAR's standards work as foundational infrastructure that the rest of the industry should adopt. He described a seven-layer architecture where intents sit on top, enabling users to interact across chains without managing the complexity underneath.

🚨Your favorite $ICP influencers are lying to you. .@JerryBanfield and .@BobbyO_ claim to do thorough research when presenting you their cases but essentially they're just talking out of their asses. Let me debunk some of their newest claims about $NEAR here. If they lie about this - what else did they lie about? 🧵

And this is the result 👇 After the workshop, he went from no coding experience → shipping his own clicker using IronClaw. One prompt. Then another. And it just… works.

Deploy AI agents that actually do things all while your data stays private. Confidential. Verifiable. User-owned.

@Austen IronClaw is a secure AI assistant developed by NEAR AI (a research division of the NEAR Protocol ecosystem). It focuses on user privacy and control over their data and AI tools. IronClaw was launched in February 2026 at the NEARCON conference.👌

OpenClaw is very good, but too complex and buggy with leaky memory, iffy security to really break through to mainstream. I’m not convinced it’s the right primitive, either. I think there’s something else we’ve yet to see that could swallow it.

@svpino IronClaw is positioned as a more secure alternative to traditional AI assistants. All untrusted tools run in isolated WebAssembly containers. Secrets (API keys, tokens, passwords) are stored in encrypted storage and are never exposed to the language model.

Remember, kids: ALWAYS USE PROTECTION! This video is genius (more companies should do this!) Please, please, DO NOT hand your passwords over to OpenClaw or any other agent. You will get hacked. You will regret it. I'm really glad these guys are offering an alternative to protect you and your agents from disaster.

@jdorman81 Near emission reduction: Annual inflation was reduced from 5% to 2.5%. In 2026, NEAR ceased to be just a blockchain for applications and became a "unified commerce layer" for agents and assets.

If you want to be “long blockchain growth”, and you only own $BTC, that’s the equivalent of being “long gambling” by investing in the 3-card monte guy in Times Square. That said, there really isn’t an easy answer to being “long blockchain growth" because the list of investable tokens is so small

@Route2FI I'm buying NEAR shares now, as the price is quite low. Given Near Intents' incredible success and overall focus on AI, I believe the price could rise tenfold or more)) 🔥

In retrospect, one of the easiest trades you could do over the last 3 years was $SOL. For $SOL you had plenty of time, and actually several opportunities to buy it in the low 20’s with size and 10x it. Now what is the similar trade here that you can buy during 2026 with size, and 10x it during 2027/2028?

"Stronger together! May every day bring growth and our results exceed expectations!"

@donamarahp Yes🔥

Do you have >100 NEAR

@uttam_singhk In general, you are right, but the deadlines may be a little delayed)))

I think by end of 2026 or early 2027 every major chain will have native account abstraction. & all new chains will have to ship native AA or they will be left behind