ChristendomFirst✝️🇻🇦

5.8K posts

ChristendomFirst✝️🇻🇦 banner
ChristendomFirst✝️🇻🇦

ChristendomFirst✝️🇻🇦

@tradasmatic95

Ave Christus Rex. 31. Father of 5. Christendom First.

Massieland, KY เข้าร่วม Haziran 2021
803 กำลังติดตาม399 ผู้ติดตาม
Ted Cruz
Ted Cruz@tedcruz·
A damning indictment.
Joel Mowbray@joelmowbray

🚨 EXCLUSIVE — Tucker Carlson won't say that Hitler murdered 6 million Jews. Based on my own long ago conversation with him, this isn't some weird fluke. Tucker simply doesn't believe the Nazis slaughtered six million Jews. So, is Tucker a Holocaust denier? Yesterday, Tucker said that "the Nazi government murdered... a whole bunch of Jews," but stressed that this was "in addition to a whole bunch of other people." He expressed outrage that Jewish victims of Hitler receive so much attention because they were "only... one specific ethnicity" murdered by the Nazis. Last month, Tucker told Clayton Morris, "Hitler killed a ton of people, including a ton of Jews." Despite extensive research, I could not find a single example of Tucker acknowledging the extraordinarily well-documented fact that six million Jews were exterminated in the Holocaust. Which brings me to a private conversation Tucker and I had maybe 15 years ago, one which I had written off at the time — but in hindsight, probably shouldn't have. (We've never been close, but would chat if we ran into each other.) For some reason, I think because I had just toured Yad Vashem, I mentioned to him how mind-boggling it is that the Nazis murdered six million Jews. Tucker shot me a strange look, almost incredulous. Sarcastically, I quipped, "You’re not one of those nutjobs who don't believe that six million Jews died, are you?" Instead of a jabbing back or acting indignant, Tucker responded, "I mean, whatever, Hitler killed a bunch of different people." It was awkward, enough so that I dropped it and quickly exited the conversation. I've thought about that a few times over the years, but couldn't bring myself to the idea that Tucker was any sort of a Holocaust denier. Now, though? The most charitable interpretation is that he's not bothered by people who downplay or minimize what the Nazis did specifically to the Jews. But by continually refusing to acknowledge that Hitler killed six million Jews, that at least borders on Holocaust denial. Even Megyn Kelly recognized that denying the full scope of what Hitler did to the Jews IS a form of Holocaust denial, at least before she became Tucker's self-appointed guardian. In her now-infamous show in front of a live audience last November, Megyn pressed him about why he "didn't raise" with Nick Fuentes his ongoing contention "that we’ve way overstated the number of Jews killed in the Holocaust." Tucker responded, "Buzz off!" The likelihood that Tucker, at least to some significant degree, is a Holocaust denier is reinforced by something else he said last month to Clayton Morris. He bizarrely claimed that Hitler hadn't "ever" called to "exterminate" the Jews, despite ample historical evidence that he (and Nazi leadership) had done exactly that. Even more shocking is that he said this as part of his argument that Hitler's rhetoric wasn't as extreme as — wait for it — Bibi Netanyahu's. Then, of course, there's the viral story that I broke last November regarding Tucker's warning that "calling people Nazis" could make people become like Dietrich Bonhoeffer — specifically that it was tragic that the Lutheran pastor had been involved in plotting to assassinate Hitler. During the middle of World War II and the Holocaust, to be clear. Like most people who have known Tucker — who is incredibly charming and often warm in person — it took me a very long time to realize that how dark some of his views truly are. But look again at just this partial track record: (1) refusing to state that Hitler murdered six million Jews, (2) denying that Hitler had ever called to exterminate the Jews, (3) insisting that Bibi's rhetoric is worse than Hitler’s, and (4) that attempting to assassinate Hitler during WWII was un-Christian and just wrong. Maybe any one of those could be explained away. But all of them together? Because, make no mistake, Tucker knows exactly what he's doing. That is probably what's scariest of all.

English
988
217
1.9K
137.4K
ChristendomFirst✝️🇻🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
Catahoula Cajun 🇻🇦
Catahoula Cajun 🇻🇦@CatahoulaCowboy·
Mary’s birth pains were at the Cross and even prophesied by Isaiah. Check this out: Isaiah 66:7–8 “Before she was in labor she gave birth; before her pain came upon her she delivered a son. Who has heard such a thing? … Shall a nation be brought forth in one moment?” - birth of the Messiah BEFORE her labor - her son delivered BEFORE her pain - a nation brought forth in one moment (the moment of the cross births the Church, that’s when and where Mary feels her labor pains) One of the saddest things to come out of the Evangelical movement is they lost much of the rich beauty and depth of the Christian faith. It’s largely hidden from them because they don’t understand typology. Anytime something sounds Catholic they automatically dismiss it.
Catahoula Cajun 🇻🇦 tweet media
English
85
140
1.5K
41.4K
ChristendomFirst✝️🇻🇦
@RealSpitfire @taporroJ113 No seriously. The moment you say he isn't your Pope, you incur automatic excommunication. You are separated from the body and blood of Jesus Christ until you confess to a priest. Code of Canon Law 1364 and 1323.
English
0
0
6
59
Spitfire
Spitfire@RealSpitfire·
The current Pope is a political hack. I say this as a Catholic. Not my Pope.
English
5.2K
1.8K
13K
1.7M
J.R. Miller
J.R. Miller@jrmiller777·
Christ alone is the rock upon which the church is built. Not Peter. Not Popes.
English
253
109
1K
172.9K
Jack Posobiec
Jack Posobiec@JackPosobiec·
I am a Knight of Columbus and I am disappointed by the statements of the Bishops on 60 Minutes as well as the Holy Father saying we need open borders to Islam. Will you be issuing a statement about that as well?
Knights of Columbus@KofC

Statement From Supreme Knight Patrick Kelly: In recent days, many Catholics and other people of goodwill have been deeply disappointed by the disparaging comments directed at Pope Leo XIV by the President of the United States. The Successor of Saint Peter is not a politician — he is the Vicar of Christ, entrusted with proclaiming the Gospel and shepherding souls. The Knights of Columbus has always stood in solidarity with the Holy Father, recognizing in him a spiritual father who calls the world not to division, but to unity, not to conflict, but to peace. In this moment, we reaffirm that commitment with clarity and conviction. At the same time, we recognize that faithful Catholics can and do engage vigorously in the public square, and that nations have a right and duty to safeguard the security of their own people — always in accordance with the demands of justice and the pursuit of peace. The Church does not ask Catholics to withdraw from civic life, but to engage with and elevate it — bringing to our civic dialogue the light of truth, respect for the dignity of every human person, and a steadfast concern for the common good. Pope Leo XIV has consistently called for peace, dialogue, and restraint in a world marked by war and suffering. The Holy Father’s words are not political talking points — they are reflections of the Gospel itself. Whether one agrees or disagrees with particular policy judgments, the Holy Father’s prophetic voice deserves to be heard with respect and engaged seriously. As Knights, we are called to be men of unity, as followers of Christ and patriotic citizens. I encourage all Knights of Columbus to pray for the Holy Father, to pray for civic leaders, and to pray for peace and those working to achieve it. And let us recommit ourselves to charity in our public discourse. May we be known not for echoing the divisions of our time, but for healing them. In a moment of tension, the path forward is not louder conflict, but deeper fidelity — to truth, to charity, and to the Gospel.

English
313
455
3.1K
105.3K
ChristendomFirst✝️🇻🇦
@rnazoun @KatjaDox Which ecclesiology? The one taught by the current canonical patriarchs or by the patristic fathers, since they both argue that neither understand ecclesiology?
English
2
0
0
19
ChristendomFirst✝️🇻🇦
@pulpchico @KatjaDox Also glad you admit that your patriarchs are producing dogmatic errors since they cannot be protected from it. Really friendly admission on your part. You rule.
English
0
0
0
11
Φώτιος🇬🇷☦️
@tradasmatic95 @KatjaDox Even when there are tensions or local restrictions, the canonical Orthodox churches remain in Eucharistic communion overall; disagreements are jurisdictional, not a denial of the one Orthodox Church or its sacraments.
English
2
0
4
35
StopAntisemitism
StopAntisemitism@StopAntisemites·
Allowing users like Jake Shields to stay on this platform is, at best, embarrassing and, at worst, potentially dangerous. @Safety @elonmusk
StopAntisemitism tweet media
English
1.2K
278
2.2K
85.4K
Eddy
Eddy@Allesontiire·
@BreeSolstad On her own, Mary is no holier than Hitler
English
25
0
5
17.4K
Bree Solstad
Bree Solstad@BreeSolstad·
Queen of Heaven and Earth. The holiest of the holiest. The Mother of God.
Bree Solstad tweet media
English
87
72
655
23.9K
Rabbi Shmuley
Rabbi Shmuley@RabbiShmuley·
Pope Leo Violates Leviticus “Don’t stand idly by the blood of your neighbor” while President Trump honors it
English
368
45
178
11.8K