Felt Ace Man

@VolleyMePlease You think only a week? I’d say 6-8 weeks.

Sinner won. Pavvy will now be posting this for the next week.

@atrupar Dementia is such a sad thing.

Trump: "I do believe I'll be having the honor of taking Cuba. That's a big honor. Taking Cuba in some form. I think I can do anything I want with it, if you want to know the truth."

@pavyg Running out of clever ways of saying the same thing over and over again? Here's an idea - maybe move on to something else?

Was it the 0000000.1 response?

@NiallStanage An effing ghoul.

Startling moment even by Trump’s standards, egging Speaker Mike Johnson on to talk about GOP Rep. Neal Dunn’s health diagnosis. Johnson hedges a bit and Trump interjects that Dunn was told he’d be dead by June. Johnson: Ok, that wasn’t public.

@pavyg If only you could give it a rest already.

Former Top 50 player Australian Marinko Matosevic has been banned for 4 years for anti doping violations. If only he had hired Jannik Sinners legal team.

@CallMeAshay @pavyg I don't think we're all that far off from one another. I only brought up the charity thing because if @pavyg is going to bring in Gates, who isn't on the tour, then every topic is up for grabs, and the discrepancy in not going after Zverev is pretty obvious.

@wayneacp @pavyg Thank you for admitting they're both the actually the same. You're right about pavvy not talking about the other. I am not here to defend him. What I had issue with was you talking about his charity which has nothing to do with the topic being discussed here.

Bill Gates recently confirmed he met Epstein on multiple occasions and had multiple affairs. He has no shame in the stands supporting his favourite player Jannik Sinner at Indian Wells this week. He shouldn't be allowed to attend Tennis matches anymore.

@CallMeAshay @pavyg Every time you try a "gotcha" with me, I basically say you're exactly right. The question is, why doesn't @pavyg do the same? That's me entire point.

@wayneacp @pavyg I used those words because they are the exact same words you can use for Zverev. But guess what. You don't use it for him. Isn't he also a "potential" wife beater? But you not using them just adds up to you own agendas against him and how you'd rather defend a billionaire.

@CallMeAshay @pavyg You seem to be in the same camp as @pavyg. He's cheated, and that's on him. If he gets charged and convicted, he should be punished. I've said that 3x already. But you and @pavyg bringing him into this discussion about tennis is absurd. You stop, and I'll stop.

@wayneacp @pavyg You have not read it? You have not read the files where his name comes in? So you're just okay with him admitting on camera he cheated. As long as he does not say it, you believe him. Bravo.

@CallMeAshay @pavyg How is there no context when rumors and accusations are the only thing @pavyg can go on, which is why you need to use the words "potential" & "possible" but the only concrete thing we know is that he has turned the 2nd half of his career into helping others and it's indisputable.

@wayneacp @pavyg Yes that is me telling you how charity has nothing to do with any potential wrong doing that any one does. I have not even talked about his charity except for replying you advocating about his charity all the time when it has nothing to do with what is being discussed here

@CallMeAshay @pavyg I have not read that Gates is a "potential" trafficker. Have you? And setting that aside, you're really putting a lot of weight on that word.

@wayneacp @pavyg I am taking his charity work negatively? How? Do you mind explaining that? Or you've run out of arguments now? Show me where I said his charity is bad? All I said is that his charity holds no ground when we talk about him being a potential trafficker. It adds no context

@CallMeAshay @pavyg Just posting your own words to prove my point. Every billionaire will open a "charity shop" to cover up for their bad deeds. Any other way to read that?

@CallMeAshay @pavyg And it seems a bit odd that you're turning his work in charity as a negative against him. The only thing he has acknowledged is that he cheated on his then wife. He should suffer the consequences of that. Everything else - if he's charged and convicted, let him rot.

@wayneacp @pavyg Charity has nothing to do with any of it being discussed. It adds no context. Every billionaire would be opening a charity shop if it added in context to their potential wrong doings.

@CallMeAshay @pavyg Oh, and not every billionaire starts a charity. He did.

@CallMeAshay @pavyg The context is that Gates hasn't been charged with anything, and as for the measure of the man, he has done a lot of good work. The only thing verifiable is that he has done good work. Until he is charged with something, what is the point?

@CallMeAshay @pavyg And not a u-turn. If he (and you) stop talking about him (which, again, he's not a tennis player), then there's nothing to talk about. But if he and you bring him up, the context argument is still relevant. But keep going if you want.

@wayneacp @pavyg Again, you could have said that without bringing in Gate's charity. And you did not bring it once, you kept bringing it in until you decided now I need to go back and say why are we even discussing this. That's not proving a point. That's a u-turn honey.

@CallMeAshay @pavyg I wouldn't have brought up Gates at all if it weren't for @pavyG bringing it up in the first place. But if you want to keep going, please do!

@CallMeAshay @pavyg But if you're going to bring it up, decades means that he's been doing good deeds to this very day for a very, very long time. That interview was a moment in time. Context.

@wayneacp @pavyg You're okay talking about his philanthropy that goes back decades, but you're not okay when I bring in an interview he gave only years ago. And now all of a sudden the man who brought charity and Zverev's allegations now wants to talk Tennis. Bravo