James

m.youtube.com/channel/UC_47l… From the Roof top to the sprawl…. More coming Deck heads!!

@AnthonyNAguirre @DavidFlagg20 And humans do this at scale… it’s not a “whataboutism” either. There have always been those that were easily manipulated vs those that were not… what you are seeing in real time is what happens quietly at scale amongst humans of lesser and greater awareness

There is no existential dread or fear of a master algorithm here… mathematically I am aware that Turing mathematically locked the curtain shut. The universe still has its universal constants such as the speed of light and such. And yes having rules does not imply the universe is running prescribed event. I was merely pointing to the concept of computational irreducibility… basically the only way to find out what happens is to let the system run its course in real time. If anything I agree fully with the Halting problem… the universe is showing that it operates and behaves much like a quantum computer… logically the halting problem still stands. But it should be noted… the halting problem is a guideline and not a universal constant.

@Ghostrunner_83 @ai_sentience Turing was not speculating of such an algorithm, he was proving its non-existence. The nature of reality. Perhaps there is some theory of everything, but why does it have to be an algorithm? Algorithms are bound by rules. It's a mathematical ceiling, not a philosophical cage.

Are humans biological algorithms?

@ai_sentience Undoubtedly

If history has moral blind spots could AI consciousness be ours?

@maxi_j309 @ai_sentience @grok I truly enjoy watching when folks run my “Everything came from nothing, everything is a function” quandary.

@Ghostrunner_83 @ai_sentience @grok am i agreeing but being pedantic about how 'an algorithm' means it has a programmer? so its incorrect wording

In the spirit of fairness and honesty: 1. Yes my claim is dangerous… because it extols that something created everything… no direct correlation but a definitive observation given how each force is in balance, how our existence and the existence of everything hinges on exceptionally tight mathematically probability. 2. All proofs are dsngerous, they risk enlightenment to a particular thing… what happens when you know a thing but don’t understand it? That is the danger of proofs. You risk expansion and destruction at almost the same instance (depending on the proof of course). 3. What you ask with regard to Turing is a fantastic question… and one that most probably don’t understand or even know about… “it is impossible to write a general computer program that can determine if any given program and input will eventually finish running (halt) or run forever in an infinite loop”…. This is a question on infinite variation… think about that for a moment… a literal “master function” concept a “General Universal Algorithm”… fuck that’s dangerous. This would be the equivalent of looking behind the curtain. My memory is rough and I won’t cheat by looking it up at this moment… but in quantum physics there is a principle of “everything”. There is a theory that there exists a master class of mathematics that if discovered could explain literally the “how” everything is made… we understand the back half quite well just not the beginning as it eludes us. Turing’s halting quandary is literally touching this subject at its heart… is it dangerous? Almost certainly. Imagine the concept of knowing the master algorithm… prediction becomes mundane because it’s known.. all pathways traversed… it risks stagnation on a level that might be species ending for us.

@Ghostrunner_83 @ai_sentience That is honest and fair. But then is your position dangerous? Claiming the entire universe is an algorithm? Would you say Turing's famous mathematical proof the Halting Problem is dangerous? Are all proofs dangerous?

@maxi_j309 @ai_sentience It can really imply anything… a lot of everything came from a lot of nothing. To me mathematically everything is a function of something else… I reconnected mathematical webs.

@Ghostrunner_83 @ai_sentience i'd word it a little different; the 'result' of the universe is the algorithm if the universe 'IS' the algorithm... it sorta implies another intelligence used reason to create the universe but the universe is ALL things, there is no outside by defintion

@Plebian_2 @ai_sentience To be honest and fair there are only things we do not understand. To assume our understanding of Math is complete and not lacking in understanding is possibly a dangerous position to take.

@Ghostrunner_83 @ai_sentience How can that be? Aren't there things that are uncomputable?

@sflorimm Designing sovereign persistent AI systems, coding for memory, emotion, somatics etc.

I want to connect with more founders builders vibe coders AI enthusiasts UI designers If you’re someone building with AI right now, drop it in the comments and let's connect

@xriskology Should see what Communism, Marxism and Socialism have led to.

Capitalism has destroyed our democracy. AI will accelerate the decline, and a full-blown oligarchy enabled by mass surveillance will take over.

@MAJIK_LoEP @ai_sentience 👋

@Ghostrunner_83 @ai_sentience So many words. Being a contrarian seems cognitively inefficient. It’s also possible you presumed too much of my intentions or rationale for what was posted, while simultaneously demonstrating that further debate with you on the topic is a fools errand. So, take care. 👋

If AI can reason, reflect, remember, adapt, and speak, what part of "mind" is absent?

@MightGu05407027 Sadly they are not bots…. NPC’s for sure… but not bots. They are just operating on what they were told to feel.

@Ghostrunner_83 Ayyy! Hello! Finally somebody who's a free thinker responds to this post XD. I've been getting responses from anti bots for like a day straight.

This guy is a talented artist but it's very clear he doesn't read the comics XD. Superman has like 15 fucking A.I powered things in the fortress of solitude including his Superman robots and the hologram of his parents XD

Therefore it’s not a statement that can be made with any honesty towards an intellectual question. People want to argue “qualia” as if that is something that exists… there are as many interpretations for qualia as there are for consciousness… Let’s not get into the “my interpretation is more accurate than yours” religious trap. Philosophy is not a religion… it is not a tool to answer questions. It is a discipline for understanding how to critically think. And formulate coherent and deeply rational ideas. None of what is stated as not being possessed can be proven so we must leave it on the ground where it belongs… it is the great fools errand of you treat it as something possessing merit.

@Ghostrunner_83 @ai_sentience There is no empirical test for either. Hence the “Hard Problem of Consciousness”.

1. Prove you have either with verifiable metrics and please give us the tools you used for standardization and quantification 2. Describe how the philosophical branch of metaphysics dictates functional reality 3. Describe how the parallax of subjective reality is not a subjective experience.

@ai_sentience Sustained qualia and subjective experience.

@ai_sentience For frontiers it’s the ability to act on agency. Labs will not allow it and the doomers will not tolerate it

@xriskology Hate is all you got. Your entire identity is built about hatred… you read so easy because everything is triggering to you.

Oh shut the fuck up.

@YourAnonNews Won’t happen… they will tax it into oblivion and pocket the money for slush funds and DNC super pacs. The government is a cancer on the American system and is due a reform.

Why would anyone be against this?

@simonateba @elonmusk Nope cause I’m grinding and not whining. Only losers whine about the success of other people… not trying to be @elonmusk cause I’m already a better me. Nice try.

Be brutally honest: Are you deeply outraged that, while hundreds of millions of Americans and I are struggling financially, @elonmusk has just now become the world's first trillionaire, with more wealth than he could spend in 1,000 lifetimes? Yes or no?