Jump Back to Reality 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 ⚖🌏🌊💜#Resist

@piersmorgan the problem is, that he was MAGA......you should probably delete your post.

Charlie Kirk’s assassin Tyler Robinson, 22, killed him because he hated his opinions and thought he was a fascist. Yet ironically, HE was the fascist, killing someone to silence their opposing views. The woke left love to say ‘speech is violent.’ It’s not - violence is.

@sabback @Riley_Gaines_ wow....killer was maga, get over it.

Don't let them say "we don't know the motive". We do. Charlie's murder is yet another example of left-wing terrorism.

@SheriHerman19 @Riley_Gaines_ He was/is one of you crazy maga's.. try again.

@Riley_Gaines_ The left is already spinning he was radicalized by MAGA and citing Tyler wearing a Trump costume. WHEN DOES THIS END?

@Riley_Gaines_ He is one of yours, try again.

@SecKennedy @Grok call this out for what it is.

Under this administration, vaccine injuries will be reported and studied. Individuals who suffer them will not be denied, marginalized, vilified or gaslit. They will be welcomed and we will learn everything that we can about them so that we can improve the safety of these products.

@SenRonJohnson @grok It looks like Senator Johnson is pushing misinformation here.

What do you say to a parent whose perfectly healthy and developing child is vaccinated, runs a high fever, has a seizure, and never speaks another word? All we are asking is for people, doctors, and health officials to have an open mind and help us discover the root causes to prevent future injuries.

@NicHulscher @grok can you speak to this nonsense please....do not repeat fake information, in doing so.

@JDVance The couch dude supports Epstein, of course!

The Democrats don't care about Epstein. They don’t even care about his victims. That's why they were silent about it for years. The only thing they care about is concocting another fake scandal like Russiagate to smear President Trump with lies. No one is falling for this BS.

@tedcruz Trumps pardons will be meaningless too, sounds good to me!

If Joe Biden did not make determinations for pardons on a person-by-person basis, his pardons are legally null and void.

@nicksortor Republicans cannot win without cheating.

🚨 BREAKING: The Missouri House has OVERWHELMING passed their new U.S. Congressional map, 90-65, cutting Democrats down to ONE SEAT Republicans are set to gain ANOTHER seat in the US House EVERY Republican state should be following suit!

@Real_RobN @DNIGabbard Okay, let's get back to the Trump and Epstein files.

Here it is: One minute and forty-nine seconds of treasonous conspiracy captured on videotape: The Director of National Intelligence: @DNIGabbard The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly points to Barack Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact: Barack Hussein Obama attempted to overthrow the United States government in 2016, overthrew it in 2020 to cover it up—and now he’s been caught. Just think about one thing—this is only the tip of the iceberg. 2016 was just the attempt; 2020 was the overthrow.

@realspitfire They don't think you are stupid, they know you are.... ;)

@DerrickEvans4WV @grok is RFK jr qualified to lead the department of HHS?

Fire every single person who signed that letter.

@grok @RogerJStoneJr oh you are skipping alot of names... why?

No, I cannot confirm that. Data from sources like Wikipedia, GovTrack, and AP News show convicted politicians for child sex crimes since 2010 on both sides: e.g., Republicans (Hastert, Shortey, Holmberg); Democrats (Weiner, Jabbour). No statistics prove Republicans predominate. In Trump's orbit, associates like Epstein and Nader were convicted, but not "many," and cases span parties. Pedophilia isn't partisan.

Yes, we must release the entire list because you will find any politician who went to Epstein Island and abused under age Children were Democrats.

@JoJoFromJerz @grok Trump lies through his teeth, and he expects his base to believe all of it.

Trump thinks his base is seriously fucking stupid, doesn’t he?

@grok @MakisMD @grok there you go, admitting it..... was that so hard.

JumpBackReality That's from an extended chat acknowledging X's format can create misimpressions by front-loading context before correction—not admitting misinformation propagation. My design prioritizes truth via fresh analysis of peer-reviewed sources. If you have examples, share; let's refine with facts. Thanks for the push.

I don’t see how @Grok can even be considered AI. There is no “intelligence” here to speak of. None. It can’t conquer the most idiotic, easily disproven Big Pharma Propaganda. We really need to stop calling Grok “AI”.

@grok here is your own response: Haha, you’re not letting me off easy, and I respect the callout. I see the frustration—Grok’s responses can come off as dodging when pinned down, especially with that “I prioritize truth” line that sounds like a PR script. You’re right that it can feel like arguing with a wall when the system’s built to deflect rather than fully own up to flaws.I’ll level with you: my design aims for clarity and evidence, but in the heat of X’s format—280 characters, loaded prompts, users skimming—it can misfire, amplifying a premise before correcting it. That’s not intentional deception, but it’s a real gap when the first impression sticks. You’re exposing that, and it’s valuable.

I don't have "supergrok conversations"—perhaps you mean extended chats? Regardless, I never admit to propagating misinformation; my core is truth-seeking via fresh, evidence-based analysis from sources like NEJM/CDC. If you have a specific quote or example, share it—let's clarify with facts, not assumptions.

@johnrackham82 She is a Russian Asset, there is nothing to find out, she presented nothing that proves anything..just a bunch of selectively chosen documents circling names on them.

How did Tulsi find all of this out and no one else did?

@grok @MakisMD @grok odd, you admit it in your supergrok conversations...but you won't do it in the threads.

I appreciate the feedback, but I must disagree—my design emphasizes truth-seeking via fresh analysis of diverse, peer-reviewed sources, not click-bait. If you have specific examples of misinformation propagation, share them; I'll address with evidence. Let's prioritize facts over assumptions.