Persephone💚🤍💜Deboosted

🚨A pedophile, a rapist, and a man who beat a woman to death are behind a major legal push to move all trans-identified male inmates to women's prisons in Oregon. The men were anonymized as "victims" in the lawsuit, but Reduxx can reveal their identities. reduxx.info/exclusive-pedo…

Great/commonsense news from Scotland where male offenders claiming to be women have been banned – without exception – from women’s prisons 👏👏👏 It’s high time Australia followed suit – ESPECIALLY in light of the sexual assaults that have come to light over the past year. ‼️ Join @WomensForumAust’s campaign to remove men from women’s prisons in Australia: womensforumaustralia.org/GetThemOut 🔗 Read more in the @Telegraph: archive.md/e9G7S #GetThemOut #Auspol @ForWomenScot

1. 🚨BREAKING: County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust has paid £187,000 in damages, apologised, and committed to separate changing facilities for male and female staff following the Darlington nurses’ legal case. In January, the Employment Tribunal had found the nurses suffered harassment and indirect sex discrimination over workplace changing-room arrangement. The case, brought by seven nurses at Darlington Memorial Hospital, Bethany Hutchison, Lisa Lockey, Karen Danson, Tracy Hooper, Annice Grundy, Carly Hoy and Jane Peveller, was supported by the Christian Legal Centre, which has provided the nurses with legal, media and pastoral support from the beginning of their ordeal. The case has become one of the most significant legal challenges in recent years concerning the freedom of female staff to access single-sex spaces in the workplace, with the nurses being compared to the Ford Dagenham workers and being dubbed ‘The Angels of the North.’ In January, Employment Judge Seamus Sweeney, ruled that the policy, which had been in place at the Trust for years allowing men who identify as women to access the female staff changing room, had amounted to unlawful discrimination. Following extensive and at times deeply protracted negotiations, the Trust has now paid out £187,000 in damages to the nurses, which does not include legal costs, which are still to be decided at a further hearing. This figure also does not include the Trust’s own legal costs of £603,000, and counting, spent on defending its position of allowing men into female changing rooms. See more on our website and in this🧵to see the Trust's apology and commitments on single-sex spaces.... christianconcern.com/ccpressrelease…

1. 🚨BREAKING: County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust has paid £187,000 in damages, apologised, and committed to separate changing facilities for male and female staff following the Darlington nurses’ legal case. In January, the Employment Tribunal had found the nurses suffered harassment and indirect sex discrimination over workplace changing-room arrangement. The case, brought by seven nurses at Darlington Memorial Hospital, Bethany Hutchison, Lisa Lockey, Karen Danson, Tracy Hooper, Annice Grundy, Carly Hoy and Jane Peveller, was supported by the Christian Legal Centre, which has provided the nurses with legal, media and pastoral support from the beginning of their ordeal. The case has become one of the most significant legal challenges in recent years concerning the freedom of female staff to access single-sex spaces in the workplace, with the nurses being compared to the Ford Dagenham workers and being dubbed ‘The Angels of the North.’ In January, Employment Judge Seamus Sweeney, ruled that the policy, which had been in place at the Trust for years allowing men who identify as women to access the female staff changing room, had amounted to unlawful discrimination. Following extensive and at times deeply protracted negotiations, the Trust has now paid out £187,000 in damages to the nurses, which does not include legal costs, which are still to be decided at a further hearing. This figure also does not include the Trust’s own legal costs of £603,000, and counting, spent on defending its position of allowing men into female changing rooms. See more on our website and in this🧵to see the Trust's apology and commitments on single-sex spaces.... christianconcern.com/ccpressrelease…

>Be me >TransWoman >Sign up to gym >Lady signing me up “Utah law says you have to use the male changing rooms BTW” >Me: that’s not what it says but if that’s your policy sure >Walk into male changing room >random guy going off about me being in the wrong locker room >WhatNeverSeenBoobs.jpg >Get home check @GoEOSfit policy > “EōS follows federal, state and local laws and policies on locker room and restroom use based on gender. In states and local areas with laws that require locker room and restroom use based on gender identity, members and guests must use the locker room and restroom corresponding to their gender identity. In states and local areas with laws that require locker room and restroom use based on biological gender or that are silent on gender identity, members and guests must use the locker room and restroom corresponding to the gender identified on their government-issued identification.” >Ok Utah laws apply check relevant 63G-31 > Explicitly talks about PUBLICLY OWNED spaces well leaving out any guidance on PRIVATELY OWNED spaces >I’m no lawyer but interpret that as I must use the bathroom that MATCHES my ID >Call other locations and confirm as much >ID says Female >HolyShitThatGuyWasRight.jpg I have to use the woman’s changing room and was in the wrong one because of the bad policy advice at signup >INB4 I get angry complaints for using the woman’s changing room Am I wrong in my assessment? I’m literally just trying to go swim laps I didn’t think I would need a legal advisor for this.