Peptide Benchmark

@10BottleValueCo @DisclosedLabs for legal reasons after FDA crackdowns, those that have done their research know what makes reta special is that it's the first triple agonist

@PeptideBench @DisclosedLabs I'm also confident that most people don't know that or have never even heard of it. When they come to their store looking for retatrutide, they simply won't find it. If they like making simple things complicated, that's their choice, but I'm not one of those people.

Cheapest verified retatrutide as of right now (per mg, COA on file): Crush Research — $1.80/mg (CRUSHX10 code) Peptide Partners — $2.36/mg (CC25 code) Voltera Sciences — $2.95/mg (DLABS code) That Crush price is 🔥 and probably won’t last long.

@10BottleValueCo @DisclosedLabs single agonist = Semaglutide double = Tirzepatide triple = Reta some vendors will use different variations of a letter and the corresponding number

@PeptideBench @DisclosedLabs I've never heard anyone refer to retatrutide as a triple agonist. Not once.

@10BottleValueCo @DisclosedLabs bro...no offense but have you not learned this in the last month? x.com/10BottleValueC… do you know what you are selling?

@DisclosedLabs Triple Agonist? Is that Retatrutide? If so, then okay.

@SabriAmca1453 This could be an ad for Reta

🟥 Filistinli mahkûm Ali Asaad Amro 2 yıl İsrail hapishanelerinde geçirdikten sonraki hali Öncesi. Sonra

@dissident42069 @fitcapbiohacker still funny.

@PeptideBench @fitcapbiohacker It's not that serious, nigga.

Way too much peptide content on this app is just affiliate marketing with no real disclosure. If you’re posting vendor praise + a coupon/referral code and you get paid when people use it, say that clearly. “Use my code” is not the same as “I earn a commission if you use it.”

@str8nubbn @rorynotsorry @PeptidePlugs lmao yes I was bawling my eyes out thanks again for your input slaying sphincters

@PeptideBench @rorynotsorry @PeptidePlugs Of course you could say that, but im not crying about wanting do be an affiliate with any company. Lol

@str8nubbn @rorynotsorry @PeptidePlugs ok both subjective things I could say you’re being negative if I didn’t like what you are saying but thanks for chiming in.

@PeptideBench @rorynotsorry @PeptidePlugs I never said every post you make. Only every post I've ever seen. I dont know any of these people much less a fan being protective. Just from a completely outside prospective you seem to be very antagonistic, and negative with a chip on your shoulder.

@fitcapbiohacker @dissident42069 this your guy? not to keep egging this on but yeah not a “man thing” to tag (I had my reasons) but go ahead and block like a man lmao

I did at first but honestly your spammy feed is just so annoying to me I didn’t want to interact and see you even more in my for you feed. I figured someone would tag you and you’d see it anyway which it did so who cares? I would have blocked you if I wasn’t “man” enough to "confront" you on X.com that's a wild thing to say from someone who labels themself a former high school athlete LMAO. Why would i be offended? My main points are facts. What you think doesn’t matter. “people can probably infer it” is not the standard. Clear disclosure is. A general “I’ve mentioned my affiliations before” is also not a blanket disclosure for every later promo post. Literally the only thing that's reasonable to have a problem with is me not tagging you and im fine with that.

@str8nubbn @rorynotsorry @PeptidePlugs Yeah EVERY single one of my posts is negative. I guess what’s negativity is technically subjective but it’s not like I’m only throwing around personal insults… I get it, a lot of you are fans of some of the people mentioned and it’s an instinct to be protective.

@PeptideBench @rorynotsorry @PeptidePlugs I dont really know who you are but I've never seen anything from you that WASNT negative. Not exactly the look id want from my affiliates. JS dude.

I bought my first bitcoin back in 2013. Witnessed many phases of the crypto space. I was always one to call out scams, larpers, or argue things that I thought were worth calling out. The peptide space gave me some similar vibes and though this account is relatively new, my affinity towards peptides, small molecules, and biohacking in general is not. I thought I’d take a similar stance. I did not like when reptides quietly transitioned from a RUO vendor to a peptide wiki then taking what to me were moral high ground stances. I may have made it personal a time or two and I regret that. My last thread I let my emotions get to me. Rough personal life stuff and doom scrolling and that’s what came out of it. I had been thinking about a recent stringent affiliate partnership process that I was genuinely impressed with. Had to sign a 7 page contract among other things. Maybe not to that extent but I thought that was needed more across both ends of affiliate partnerships. It just so happened that two vendors I had reached out to with affiliate inquiries were some I saw pop up in non disclosed promotional posts. I could have chosen a different path to convey what I wanted. I am going to try to be more positive in general though I do think too many convey criticism as hate. I might delete the thread that started this because unlike some think, I dont care about the clout. The perceived damage has been done either way.

@Joel_right_now @rorynotsorry @PeptidePlugs so calling something out publicly without insult or baseless facts = taking shots at someone? seems like a reach to me but I'll say it again — it was not my intent for it to be interpreted like that and I'm sorry

@PeptideBench @rorynotsorry @PeptidePlugs Taking shots at someone and then complaining that they don't give you an affiliate agreement would seem akin to making negative comments about a company you're applying for a job with and then being upset when you don't get the job. Popular opinion seems to agree.

@tonymission @BuckeyeGrad1999 @fitcapbiohacker @ogsvg @rorynotsorry just a perfect storm for different reasons, I know the optics arent the greatest but I wasn't considering that then.

@PeptideBench @BuckeyeGrad1999 @fitcapbiohacker @ogsvg @rorynotsorry It was kind of a strange thing to add to the end of the disclosure rant don't you think? Calling us out publicly for not responding to your affiliate request. 🤷‍♂️

@dissident42069 @fitcapbiohacker @rorynotsorry @PeptidePlugs good for you and him

@fitcapbiohacker @PeptideBench @rorynotsorry @PeptidePlugs Also, I'm about to use your code. Fuck this dude.

@TheShreddington @fitcapbiohacker but i told my mom to use code red at checkout 😔

@fitcapbiohacker @PeptideBench Looks like it’s attempting to create an issue…where there isn’t one…to support its purpose for being in the X peptide space

@PeptideBench cleanest take on this i've seen. simple test: if pulling the affiliate code would change whether you'd recommend it, it was never a review. it's why aggregate data from people with nothing to sell beats any "use my code" post every time.

@JimBartlett @BuckeyeGrad1999 @fitcapbiohacker @ogsvg @rorynotsorry @tonymission Thanks for your input, Jim.

@BuckeyeGrad1999 @PeptideBench @fitcapbiohacker @ogsvg @rorynotsorry @tonymission Sounds right

@BuckeyeGrad1999 @fitcapbiohacker @ogsvg @rorynotsorry @tonymission If that's how you want to interpret it, it is what it is. I wouldn't say I trashed @rorynotsorry or @tonymission or at least it was certainly not my intent but everything else you are probably referring to was based off what i would argue are facts.

So just to recap: Your account was created 90 days ago. You have sub-100 followers. A quick scan of your timeline, and I see trash talking post regarding @fitcapbiohacker @ogsvg @rorynotsorry and @tonymission Admitted to messing up your own proprietary ranking system and having to fix it. I’m not sure what your end game is here, but if it’s trying to build trust within the small peptide community on X, I can assure you this is not a great start.

Totally fair, and I appreciate the response. No need to apologize. You’ve clearly built a strong reputation and support base, and I get being selective about who you work with. On my side, I was frustrated by the broader pattern of affiliate spam / weak disclosure in this space, and that saltiness bled into that reply more than it should have. That part is on me. I was planning on adding crushx10 into the pricing soon as a fallback either way and I'm content with that. Appreciate the explanation and the thoughtful reply.

Hi... first of all. I apologize for not getting back to you, but honestly I've been on vacation. So I want to be transparent on where I am going on affiliates and relative websites. First of all you mention @fitcapbiothacker in the thread who is an affiliate... but he is also a customer and had been following me and advocating for me for several months first. He has also been producing. I only recently agreed to have affiliates, because quite simply I have a fairly large social media reach myself. I was able to (and probably still can) sell myself out with my X account, substack account and tiktok page alone. The simple fact is that an affiliate model adds cost to the consumer, which is something I have problems with. At some point, the affiliates also start to compete with each other if they are all congregated on the same platform. I've know Ben from @peptiprices and the guys from @PeptideCritic for quite sometime (since before I was a vendor)... they both have targeted advertising on other sites besides X which helps bring in new customers. Others such as @kalospepgod took the time to build relationships with me before we entered into a partnership. As far as peptide benchmark, I simply haven't had the time to investigate to be able to make an educated decision. What sort of criteria do you use? (for example if you are ranking single vial half ass testers on the same level as those who do extensive testing... then I would probably pass), etc... Simply put, while this is a business for me that I full intend on running well, I have several strong opinions on what is important... testing and pricing. If a site doesn't align with those values, then I am generally not interested. However, it was rude of me not to reply to you to at least politely say, give me some time to review the request. For this I apologize. I will message after posting this. I just thought this was an opportunity to express my general views.

This is fixed, PeptidePlugs landed at 7.5 just let the scoring pipelines do the work — there is no manual input from me. I hadn't looked before but Disclosed Labs has them at what would be a 7.6 so this seems about right.