DailyTodayDaily

2.6K posts

DailyTodayDaily banner
DailyTodayDaily

DailyTodayDaily

@RealDailyToday

Premium news I with jokes I wrote about eleven minuets ago. Support me on youtube - Help I need to rent https://t.co/M3Gg1RWEcl

Virginia, USA Sumali Aralık 2024
154 Sinusundan152 Mga Tagasunod
Naka-pin na Tweet
DailyTodayDaily
DailyTodayDaily@RealDailyToday·
Calling the Ayatollah gay for 2 minuets and 38 seconds
English
0
0
0
131
Adam Schiff
Adam Schiff@SenAdamSchiff·
Eric Trump gets a massive Pentagon contract. Melania gets a movie. Donald Trump gets millions in payouts and crypto. They’re all cashing in. And the corruption is killing our economy.
Adam Schiff tweet media
English
5K
7.9K
18.3K
270K
Andrew Wilson
Andrew Wilson@paleochristcon·
Whats everybody angry about today?
English
1.1K
33
1.2K
67.9K
DailyTodayDaily
DailyTodayDaily@RealDailyToday·
@ConceptualJames Andrew is the litmus test for Acidic Christian exegesis. If he says it, it’s probably acidic
English
0
0
0
41
James Lindsay, anti-Communist
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames·
I find this mind-boggling, to be honest, and I'm not arguing that Christians should be pacifists or whatever. The example Wilson gives here about selling your cloak to buy a sword comes from the Gospel of Luke. I'm an agnostic and even know this story. He exegetes it wrong. In fact, he exegetes it completely wrong. The point of the story in Luke is that Jesus knows he's about to be taken by the Romans, so he instructs his disciples to get armed, even telling them to sell their cloaks to buy a sword if they must. The point is not to fight, though, as Wilson uses it to mean. The point is completely otherwise. Jesus actually makes this clear IN THE NEXT SENTENCE, BEFORE HE'S EVEN DONE SPEAKING to his disciples. He is doing it so that when he is taken he will fulfill the prophecy in Isaiah about the Messiah being "numbered among the transgressors." The context is that Romans would see an armed band as transgressors and thus take Jesus into custody upon those terms. When Jesus' disciples say they already have two swords, Jesus replies "it is enough." Enough for what? Fighting off Romans who are there to keep the law? No way. For looking like an armed band of transgressors, which would fulfill the prophecy in Isaiah? Yes. But it's not just speculation. The swords are explicitly NOT for fighting back. When Peter draws his sword in the forthcoming scene and slices the ear off a Roman in Gethsemane (where I have stood), Jesus rebukes him for it, saying whoever takes up the sword will die by it. That's one of the MOST FAMOUS STORIES IN THE WHOLE GOSPEL. His disciples weren't armed to fight back. Fighting back wasn't part of the equation. It's bewildering to me that Wilson would use this particular example to make his point. It reminds me of the time I mixed up the point of the story about the wheat and the tares because I wasn't actually all that familiar with the story but knew of it vaguely. Romans 13 (Paul, not Jesus) makes a better case for the authorities being invested with the authority to use force to maintain safety and order. Even the apt example of Jesus chasing moneychangers out of the Temple with a whip makes the case, but this other thing is simply mind-boggling to see. Even I know better.
TRIGGERnometry@triggerpod

“Christianity was never a ‘be passive and get walked over’ religion.” Andrew Wilson @paleochristcon pushes back on the idea that Christianity is a pacifist religion. Forgive your enemies, yes, but that doesn’t mean allowing harm to continue. He points to Jesus forgiving on the cross, yet also cleansing the temple and speaking about the sword. What do you think? Where did the idea that Christianity = passivity actually come from?

English
229
61
731
120.5K
DailyTodayDaily
DailyTodayDaily@RealDailyToday·
@tedlieu I have 4 years of you not caring to justify my not caring
English
0
0
1
35
Bee Haber
Bee Haber@beehaber·
Erin Moriarty, hakkında çıkan estetik iddialarına tepki gösterdi. 🔹 “Estetik yaptırmadım.” 🔹 “Bu söylentiler iğrenç şekilde asılsız.” 🔹 “Benim için bu, düpedüz bir taciz.” 🔹 “The Boys’un final sezonunu çekerken Graves belirtilerini fark etmedim ve kendimi ölüyor gibi hissettim.” 🔹 “Şiddetli yorgunluk, mide bulantısı, kas güçsüzlüğü ve hızlı kilo kaybı yaşadım.” 🔹 “Yüzümün incelmesi ve gözlerimin daha belirgin görünmesi de bu yüzden oldu.” 🔹 “Ameliyat kanıtı diye dolaştırılan fotoğrafta aslında yoğun kontür makyajı vardı.” 🔹 “O gün çok stresliydim ama o makyajla kendimi güzel hissetmiştim.” 🔹 “Karşılaştırma için kullanılan eski fotoğraflar da neredeyse 10 yıl öncesine ait.” 🔹 “O zaman daha 22 yaşındaydım.” 🔹 “Fiziksel değişimim, neredeyse hiç yiyemediğim ve uyuyamadığım yoğun stres dönemine denk geldi.” 🔹 “Bu süreçte yaklaşık 5 kilo verdim.”
Bee Haber tweet mediaBee Haber tweet media
Türkçe
290
135
8K
2.5M
まだ面白い
まだ面白い@madaomoshiroi·
馬って人間いないと爪どうしてるんや…
日本語
1.4K
213
7K
12.1M
Piers Morgan
Piers Morgan@piersmorgan·
If President Trump wants to take the Falkland Islands away from Britain, then we must reclaim the United States. Perfect way to celebrate the 250th anniversary of American Independence. King Charles can announce it to Congress next week.
English
31.3K
3.9K
38.5K
7.2M
DailyTodayDaily
DailyTodayDaily@RealDailyToday·
@TuckerCarlson So Jesus covered how we respond to enemies In Matthew 5:44. You do seem to deliberately and consistently ignore that teaching when it comes to a very specific group of people… for some reason. Can’t imagine why
English
0
1
1
107
Tucker Carlson
Tucker Carlson@TuckerCarlson·
Why would an Israeli soldier use a sledgehammer to smash the face of Jesus? Because there are a lot of people in Israel who hate Christianity above all. How can American evangelical leaders support this?
English
4.1K
14.7K
62.2K
1.4M
Mr. Nobody
Mr. Nobody@MmisterNobody·
This makes no sense at all...
Mr. Nobody tweet media
English
561
226
2.8K
161K
Nicholas J. Fuentes
Nicholas J. Fuentes@NickJFuentes·
Trump and his Zionist backers intentionally used “mass deportations” as bait to get White people to vote for him so that he could take us to war in Iran. This is the conceit of Republican politics— using Right Wing culture war to conscript voters to back the special interests.
English
1.6K
4.1K
37.3K
614.8K
DailyTodayDaily
DailyTodayDaily@RealDailyToday·
@MikeBales Dracula - “What’s the use prolonging life, if life is not worth living. If you love me set me free and let me touch the light”
English
0
0
0
64
DailyTodayDaily nag-retweet
Harry
Harry@Realmecore_0·
ZXX
58
556
10K
403.9K
DailyTodayDaily
DailyTodayDaily@RealDailyToday·
@Gogettacs @ZipZap96947221 @PaulPastora @realmikolson You will know them by their fruits... And as I am instructed to those whosoever shall not receive, nor hear, when ye depart, shake off the dust of your feet. Repent and be saved by faith. This will be my last remark to you.
English
0
0
1
15
trinitydebunked
trinitydebunked@Gogettacs·
@RealDailyToday @ZipZap96947221 @PaulPastora @realmikolson You look dumb talking about some “I’ll pray for you” when you don’t even have the revelation of Jesus Christ, dumb as atheist, stop pretending to be a worshiper of Christ when you don’t even have his Spirit And I won’t be praying for you, you will receive what’s due to you, death
English
2
0
0
22
Mikale Olson
Mikale Olson@realmikolson·
Bible teaching moment: This is a classic misunderstanding of the text below. You’re quoting James chapter 2, where James is addressing how to recognize whether someone is a Christian, not what makes a person right before God. This is clear from the context of chapter 1 and continues throughout the rest of the letter. When James uses the word “justified,” he’s not using it in the same sense as Paul does in Romans 3, for example, or as Luke does in his Gospel: “wisdom is justified by her children” (same Greek word, but obviously not used in a soteriological sense). This is known as semantic range. In James 2, “justified” means “vindicated.” In other words, he’s saying that real faith produces works. If no good works follow, the faith is not genuine. James is NOT saying doing good stuff gets you to heaven or merits righteousness with God.
Mikale Olson tweet media
Wittorical@Wittorical

@realmikolson Protestants: Faith alone is in the Bible! Bible: Faith without works is dead.

English
80
21
334
25.9K
DailyTodayDaily
DailyTodayDaily@RealDailyToday·
Well… is he allowed to go outside the marriage for things she’s not providing? No? So then what exactly IS the relationship if she won’t give him the thing which is exclusively reserved for your wife? A friendship where he pays for all your things? At what point does his desire get a say in how he behaves **in the same way** hers is.
English
0
0
3
467