stacking π

if you are building on #Pi, you have to understand that there is a shift in how business is done in a $Pi economy. micro-transactions are the best revenue models to follow. If you know that new users coming in are only mining 0.003π/hr, they won't be able to afford your business at the current market price. therefore, you have to think of new ways to create businesses. if the average citizen has to pay 1 pi to KYC, then they will only have bits of pi to spend; they will look for businesses where they can afford it. that's why new business models have to be explored to reach a greater number of users. it's business velocity π

#Pi bmp = 1π -- if you can't imagine a compressed beachball being held on the bottom floor of the ocean, then imagine the velocity of speed a giant slingshot thats been pulled back to the absolute peak $Pi π //@PiCoreTeam //@nkokkalis //@Chengdiao //@hokanewscom

#Pi this is where @openmind_agi // @FabricFND comes in. the network activity won't be done primarily by humans, but machines. 24/7, computational demand, and the backbone of this is $Pi nodes //@PiCoreTeam π

#Pi compute cost of microns of $Pi - imagine the velocity of speed that will create #PiNetwork π stable fractions of pi that aren't looked at as "network spam", but high valued fractional units of account //@PiCoreTeam //@nkokkalis //@Chengdiao

#Pi unit bias is rampant in other crypto networks. when you understand that there will be more ai agents & autonomous machines than humans as the economic layer, you'll start to understand why metrics like "marketcap" start to look silly $Pi π #PiNetwork //@PiCoreTeam

#Pi "what is the value of a /trusted/ (kyc) human coordinator?" $Pi π—π #PiNetwork //@PiCoreTeam //@nkokkalis //@Chengdiao π

#Pi, therefore, you need a stable, trusted unit of account across all sectors for interoperability to seamlessly work. again, we ask, what is the value of a human coordinator? this is high level, look at the whole board, not the price ticker #PiNetwork π $Pi //@PiCoreTeam //@Chengdiao

#Pi imagine you paid 0.0000001π $Pi to unlock a rented vehicle. then you went shopping at the grocery store. as you were in the store, there was a surge in compute demand because some new rwa was listed to the public, and everyone and their momma was trying to get access. you come out of the store, and now your session cost is 0.1π - this is what happens with the way things are currently; this can't happen lol π #PiNetwork //@DIMO_Network

#Pi "machines don't care about price" $Pi, and as famously said by @JanLiphardt here --> "robots do not want power. we seek efficiency" π #PiNetwork

#Pi people continue to measure $Pi by outdated metrics. how can you have a machine-to-machine economy if the underlying rails have fluctuations in price? if you have a @DIMO_Network vehicle that uses compute that costs 0.0001π, then, because a high-traffic app drives up compute demand, those underlying denominations cost more under the outdated metric. it would turn that 0.0001 into 0.01, and it would destroy the entire machine chain. obviously, that can't happen. pi has to be a stable unit of account, and you can't be a stable unit of account if you are relying on price oracles from exchanges thats filled with high-frequency algorithmic bots whose only goal is to maximize profits. this isn't chess, this is weiqi //@PiCoreTeam //@nkokkalis