SteelToedSlippers

This is the amount of bloom silksong needed to win best art design

@ELIKEM_3 @channnnnyyyyy Not really, the ISS constantly films the earth, but the ISS also constantly spins around the earth so you are not just seeing the earths rotation in the footage. youtube.com/live/vytmBNhc9…

@SteelToedSocks @channnnnyyyyy Is there any video of it?

I took a picture of the sea, and I can’t even see the sharks.

@b_gimpl1234 @alexboge You can see them from earth in the right conditions. they are only a few 100 miles away. They cannot see them from the Artemis 2, they are 50,000 miles away

@alexboge So how do we supposedly see them at night? Even with sunlight reflecting it doesnt seem likely. I can barely see a plane reflecting at dusk? I have videos of similar looking "lights" wandering around the stars. Something dont add up.

“If there are 10,000 satellites in orbit, how come we can’t see them?” TLDR: At the distances where spacecraft photograph Earth, seeing satellites is physically impossible. Not with the human eye, not with cameras, not even with the most ridiculous zoom you could possibly imagine. Satellites are tiny, space is vast, and the distances involved are far beyond what intuition can handle. ⸻ One of the most common things I hear repeated over and over is this question from deniers: “If there are thousands of satellites around Earth, how come we don’t see any of them in photos?” The answer is incredibly simple. Satellites are very small. Space is very large. The distances are enormous. Take one of the most widely shared recent images from Artemis II. That photo was taken conservatively from about 60,000 miles away, likely more. At that distance, a typical Starlink satellite, about 3 meters across, would subtend only about 0.006 arcseconds. What does that actually mean? It means trying to see that satellite would be like trying to spot a ping pong ball from roughly 800 miles away. Now compare that to real limits: • Human eye (ideal conditions): ~60 arcseconds → about 9,000 times larger • Very sharp imaging systems (~1 arcsecond): → about 150 times larger • Even the Hubble Space Telescope (~0.05 arcseconds): → about 8 times larger Even extreme zoom cameras, like Flat Earthers’ favorite Nikon P1000, lose objects this size within a few hundred miles. At 60,000 miles, there is nothing to resolve. And in that Artemis image itself: Each pixel spans several arcseconds, meaning the satellite would be roughly 1,300 to 2,000 times smaller than a single pixel. It’s not merely unresolvable. It is deeply sub-pixel. Literally invisible. So no matter how many satellites are up there, each individual one is so small at those distances that it is completely beyond the resolving power of the human eye, conventional cameras, and even our most advanced optical systems. The answer is obvious, and it has been given to deniers countless times. They’re not seeking answers. They’re not seeking truth. They’re trying to keep their zombie conspiracy alive, which only survives by ignoring physics, photography limits, and reality.

@ELIKEM_3 @channnnnyyyyy Yes, but its spins really slow.

@channnnnyyyyy Genuine question. Would you be able to see the earth spinning when you're in outer space?

@Sheeees69113029 @gaymergir That just can’t be true, there’s only 15000 satellites. That’s over 10000 square miles per satellite. Also it brings Internet to a lot of communities that can’t get it otherwise.

@gaymergir Kinda unrelated but the 10k starlink satellites make it near impossible to find a launch window, also one of them drops like every day, it's literally one man's ego project trashing orbit and earth

*muffled screaming*

@DavidSh22945550 @Know_More_News If you are talking about this image you can see South America on the right and Antarctica at the top but it’s hard to make out.

@Know_More_News I guess North America , south America, Australia, Europe, Asia, and Antarctica are ALL completely on the other side of the earth? You believe some retarded shit.

People making this unbelievably stupid argument says a lot about their intelligence.

@SenatorBeau @JinjoMf @__vikiki @lesbopolo I think it’s fair to say we want Taiwan to have self determination, but it’s not worth going to nuclear war over.

@JinjoMf @__vikiki @SteelToedSocks @lesbopolo Okay, which one is it “America doesn’t want a war to stop it” Or “We should respect their wishes” If they wish to be protected, we have enough nukes to protect them….. You are like Hasan Just basic bitch leftist scum trying to justify why we allow you to live

and then he looks you directly in the eyes and calls himself an anti-imperialist

@JinjoMf @lesbopolo A Hasan fan will watch a clip of Hasan gleefully saying Crimea belongs to Russia and say he opposes Russian aggression

@SteelToedSocks @lesbopolo Hasan supports Crimea self determination and opposes all Russian aggression Hasan supports Taiwan self determination and opposes China aggression 99% of the planet is against Israel

@JinjoMf @lesbopolo The US opposes Russian land expansion, so Hasan supports it. The US opposes China taking back Taiwan, so Hasan supports it. The US supports Israel, so Hasan is against it.

@SteelToedSocks @lesbopolo This topic is Crimea. I think you should check a map

@KVisner @YIMBYLAND There’s like 2 dozen refineries nearby

@YIMBYLAND But where do you work to pay for the house?

Galveston remains one of the most underrated parts of the US. Imagine living in a 100 year old Victorian in a walkable neighborhood minutes away from the beach for under 500k. Insane.

The amount of people in on it would be astronomical and a lot of them wouldn’t even have jobs in the field. Theres over 500,000 pilots licenses in the US alone, over 2000 observatories, the entire field of aerospace, millions of people with telescopes and anyone’s who has ever climbed something high or seen a boat vanish over the horizon.

the launch of Artemis II has made me realise how many moon landing deniers exist and it baffles me how many people could be that stupid

@sandalsonfeet @mcrs987 They do make sure the launch isn’t near anything but they realistically don’t have to. Theres 15000 satellites in space, which sounds like alot but compared to the size of the earth it’s nothing.

@mcrs987 hi @mcrs987 -this might be a dumb question idk 🤷🏼‍♀️ ...but do launch trajectories (and re-entry paths) have to take into account all the satellites & space debris orbiting the earth in order to avoid collisions.

This stuff just has me completely speechless, man.

@jjsquintz @BurtMacklin_FBI It was rotated to give the crew a frame of reference

@BurtMacklin_FBI They are flying away from earth, there are no windows that face back, there is no way you can look out the side and see earth. But yeah its real..... think about it for 2 seconds.

The replies to this post make me sad. People not knowing how a reflection works, confused about what the atmosphere looks like from space, questioning why they can only see so many bolts around a window, etc. We are inching ever so close to Idiocracy.

@jdjaguar44 @dpoddolphinpro x.com/nasa/status/20…

@dpoddolphinpro Such a remarkable sight That the public isn’t allowed to see it

The toilet broke again. Someone call the space plumber. Mission Control Houston believes that a frozen vent is to blame, and have oriented Integrity so that the sun will warm this vent & melt the blockage. This is not diminishing the Artemis II crew's views of Earth however. Commander @astro_Reid Wiseman: "It's just a truly remarkable sight". When the toilet is out-of-action, the crew can make use of Collapsible Contingency Urinals (CCUs).

@colblake_yqr @danae_hudlow It’s got a spot a loading dock can go and will go, but there’s no actual mechanism there. They did a simulated docking test. They definitely never planned to dock with the ISS the orbits are not even close.

@SteelToedSocks @danae_hudlow havent you watched the "footage" they keep talking about the loading dock on artimus.

It really upsets me that most of the time when I see these shots, I cannot under any circumstances tell which land mass I am seeing

@SlapZ0g @CollinRugg I haven’t check the dudes resume but the women’s resume is insane.

@CollinRugg oh look how the women and the black are front and center. This political BS really takes away from this mission. When the 2 DEI hires get back "They" will parade them around like crazy Clown world garbage.

NEW: Artemis 2 crew explains the difficulty of sleeping during their mission to the Moon. Question: “What does sleeping even look like?” Answer: “It’s actually sorta comical. Christina has been sleeping heads down in the middle of the vehicle, kinda like a bat suspended from our docking tunnel.”

@colblake_yqr @danae_hudlow The Artemis 2 shuttle doesn’t have a dock. They did a simulated docking test but it was just making sure the docking controls work correctly, they didn’t actually hook up with anything.

@SteelToedSocks @danae_hudlow why else would they say artimus shuttle say they have a loading dock? why put a dock on a lunar orbit mission when your not getting out?

@colblake_yqr @danae_hudlow You mentioned docking with the ISS, they didn’t dock with the ISS on the Artemis 2 mission.

@SteelToedSocks @danae_hudlow thats the iss...not artimus going to the moon.

@colblake_yqr @danae_hudlow youtube.com/live/vytmBNhc9… There is a 24/7 livestream. Keep in mind the ISS orbits near the poles.

@danae_hudlow i just thought of something. after they docked with the iss there is no VIDEO of the earth spinning. ever think of that?

@Rosicrucix @Unapologet26919 @ChrisMartzWX @PBFloyd5 If you are in space and you throw a rock, will the rock move or the person

@Unapologet26919 @ChrisMartzWX @PBFloyd5 Other than NASA storytelling, can you show me evidence of propulsion in a vacuum?

Everything is a conspiracy when you don’t understand how anything works.