Naka-pin na Tweet
#Bitcoin bear market patterns are being followed in 2022... but not perfectly.
Let's check out the previous #BTC bear markets and how this one is alike and different.
Follow for more
#Crypto #bearmarket
👇🧵
English
Stuckastic
1.2K posts
@BronGotGame lol wait - in this dudes hypothetical, Kyrie never gets hurt?
English
Bro I deadass been saying this for years, that 2015 year was the nastiest domino effect
English
A shot-for-shot comparison between Harry Potter in 2001 and Harry Potter in 2026!
Are you liking what you’re seeing?
English
BREAKING: The Department of State now advises Americans worldwide to exercise increased caution.
English
Rule #1 here is that the offense cannot catch it ahead of you going downhill.
Iowa gets its best player the ball with a clear attack.
English
@fiatarchive I’m once again asking for a single example of a financial asset that has ever followed this pattern in the history of mankind
English
@NipseyHoussle It was a good run. I’ve kinda given up hope that things will change
English
@Hoopss Aw yes, Dirk defeated great stars such as Ramao, Bestbroon, and Jamis
English
@legen_eth This is the most smooth brain math
You could claim the same thing about buying a cheaper house on a 30 year mortgage
Housing dynamics will fill the gap, either on the financing or the house price side
It’ll only get more expensive and you won’t truly save anything
English
If you choose a 30 year mortgage over a 50 year mortgage you’re financially retarded.
The difference between a $400k loan at 6% interest is $300 a month.
Sure you end up paying $600k more in interest.
But the $300/month is equivalent to $4.4m if invested in the s&p500…
Chief Nerd@TheChiefNerd
$400,000 Mortgage Comparison @ 6% 30-Year Mortgage - Monthly Payment: $2,398 - Total Loan Cost: $863,352 50-Year Mortgage - Monthly Payment: $2,106 - Total Loan Cost: $1,263,372 Which would you pick?
English
@marketmike Or maybe… just maybe… we should see housing as housing and not a way to screw over the next generation
But I guess we’re just looking at it all wrong
English
@VinceDaoTV Housing dynamics my man
Financing and/or house prices will fill the gap, making it even harder to pay off early
English
What’s stopping you from paying it off sooner or refinancing?
I don’t really see the issue here.
It’s just a foot-in-the-door. You can still pay it off in 30 years.
rowdyamerican@rowdyamerican69
@EricLDaugh A 50-year mortgage, really? Just sounds like a new way to keep young people in debt longer. This isn't a foot in the door; it's a financial trap disguised as opportunity. Be careful who you trust with your future.
English
Thanks to President Trump, we are indeed working on The 50 year Mortgage - a complete game changer.
Commentary Donald J. Trump Posts From Truth Social@TrumpDailyPosts
Donald J. Trump Truth Social Post 02:10 PM EST 11/08/25
English
Pent up risk cannot be eliminated from an economic system
It can be actualized (taking the L for bad policy and financial decisions)
It can be delayed
Or it can be converted into inflation
English
@NBATourDates Has his form changed since Boston? His shot looks weird
English
Kristaps Porzingis tonight:
4-16 FGM
1-7 3PM
30 MIN
7 FEET TALL LAUNCHING 30 FOOTERS AND MISSING OPEN LAYUPS 🔥🔥
maddox!@fuckkmaddox
@NBATourDates kristaps porzingis
English
@scottmelker @elonmusk My guy, Tesla was unprofitable for 17 straight years. lol
You do know that that Elon Musk joined Tesla after he was rich and didn’t in fact start the company, right?
English
Imagine if @elonmusk became a billionaire from presenting the idea of the electric car before building one.
The Wolf Of All Streets@scottmelker
Crypto has a huge problem – and it’s one we almost never talk about honestly. How do founders make hundreds of millions (or billions) from tokens they created before their products prove real utility or adoption? In traditional markets, value follows performance: founders get rich because their company builds something people use, generates profit, and grows over time. In crypto, it’s often reversed. Tokens launch first, valuations skyrocket on speculation, and founders cash out long before the product is battle-tested or the network achieves meaningful usage. The result is a strange inversion of incentives – enormous wealth built on potential rather than proof. And because tokens trade globally, that value is extracted from retail participants who are effectively subsidizing the experiment. I’m not saying founders shouldn’t be rewarded for innovation. Many are building genuinely transformative tech. But when billion-dollar fortunes are realized before success is earned, it raises a fundamental question: If the future value is still undetermined, why are the rewards already realized? That disconnect is what keeps so many people skeptical of token models. Until the industry ties founder upside more closely to actual adoption and network usage, the “speculation over substance” narrative will remain deserved.
English
@Beastbr00k0 Nobody deserves to be on a good basketball team
Good players make their teams good basketball teams
English
Russell Westbrook belongs on a good basketball team
Get Russ on a contender please
Hoop Central@TheHoopCentral
Russell Westbrook’s last 3 games: 18 PTS — 6 REB — 6 AST — 27 MIN 16 PTS — 9 REB — 4 AST — 30 MIN 12 PTS — 2 REB — 4 AST — 29 MIN
English
@scottmelker Be careful when you use a term like “generate profits”. Most companies are not profitable, but their founders still make a ton of money. This isn’t just a crypto thing
English
Crypto has a huge problem – and it’s one we almost never talk about honestly.
How do founders make hundreds of millions (or billions) from tokens they created before their products prove real utility or adoption?
In traditional markets, value follows performance: founders get rich because their company builds something people use, generates profit, and grows over time. In crypto, it’s often reversed. Tokens launch first, valuations skyrocket on speculation, and founders cash out long before the product is battle-tested or the network achieves meaningful usage.
The result is a strange inversion of incentives – enormous wealth built on potential rather than proof. And because tokens trade globally, that value is extracted from retail participants who are effectively subsidizing the experiment.
I’m not saying founders shouldn’t be rewarded for innovation. Many are building genuinely transformative tech. But when billion-dollar fortunes are realized before success is earned, it raises a fundamental question:
If the future value is still undetermined, why are the rewards already realized?
That disconnect is what keeps so many people skeptical of token models. Until the industry ties founder upside more closely to actual adoption and network usage, the “speculation over substance” narrative will remain deserved.
The Wolf Of All Streets@scottmelker
Crypto is primarily speculation. Retail speculates on price. Founders speculate on product market fit. The main issue is that the founders often profit massively, whether the product succeeds or not. In a rational world, most tokens should be worth close to zero UNTIL a product is launched and gains adoption.
English
How many snowflake parents will be triggered by a teacher who is having her students learn:
• to pay attention to their surroundings
• hand eye co-ordination
• work both as a team and individuals
• have fun
• get exercise
• take a knock down and get back up
English
You are delusional if you think the bull market will end in Q4 while the fed barely started cutting rates
English