@ZouhairsMurid Kindly tell me how correct you think al Kashmiri’s view on Sifat Fi’liyyah is, alleged Ash’ari :)
English
vi
2.8K posts
"My sheikh doesn't make mistakes but al Kashmiri does"
Since he can't find mistakes with his sheikh I will:
-Taking him as a student
-not beating him up despite having the authority to do so
vi@funfire5
@Simsimiyyah @amuseingtime @oharalq My shaykh isn’t an authority, but I have, not once, seen him stray from the Madhab, unlike Allamah Kashmiri who is well known for sometimes holding views contrary to the madhab.
English
@Simsimiyyah @ZouhairsMurid Get your buddy to stop replying for every tweet directed at you, Simsim al Genuis
English
@Simsimiyyah @amuseingtime @oharalq My shaykh isn’t an authority, but I have, not once, seen him stray from the Madhab, unlike Allamah Kashmiri who is well known for sometimes holding views contrary to the madhab.
English
@amuseingtime @funfire5 @oharalq @amuseingtime Anwar Shah Kashmiri is not an authority in the Ḥanafī maḏhhab but his teacher is.
vi@funfire5
@Simsimiyyah @oharalq I don't see what's so hard to understand about this. Literally ask any Hanafi aalim, I learned this myself in a dars
Română
@amuseingtime You guys are asking the same question 10 times just worded slightly differently. The answer remains the same.
English
'So and so has done an act of kufr, dont pray behind him, your marriage is invalid, his meat is halal, dont socialise with him or make dua for him after he dies' [so we call him a murtad but soften our words?]
vi@funfire5
@Simsimiyyah @oharalq By witnessing clear kufr from someone, you'd say "so and so has done such act, so don't pray behind him or eat his slaughter", but not actually using the word kafir or murtad.
English
@amuseingtime @Simsimiyyah @oharalq I’ll look into the book inshaAllah, but Allamah Kashmiri رحمه الله isn’t an authoritative scholar in the Hanafi madhab so this can’t be considered the madhab’s view, he has tafarrudat in Fiqh and even in Aqidah, he affirms Shaykh Ibn Taymiyyah’s view on Sifat fi’liyyah for ex.
Català
@funfire5 @Simsimiyyah @oharalq Requiring a qadhi to declare someone a kafir isn't a hanafi requirement. You can read ikfar almulhideen by Anwar shah kashmiri.
English
@oharalq @Simsimiyyah @StudentOfAhmad No because there could be barriers to takfir in many cases, the kufr of Qadiyanis isn't like this
English
@funfire5 @Simsimiyyah @StudentOfAhmad Wait so on issues where the disbelief is a clear matter, which the muslims have all agreed on is kufr which takes one out of ʾIslām, then anyone who holds this belief you can takfīr as a laymen yes?
English
English
@Simsimiyyah @oharalq By witnessing clear kufr from someone, you'd say "so and so has done such act, so don't pray behind him or eat his slaughter", but not actually using the word kafir or murtad.
English
English
@Simsimiyyah @oharalq Has anyone ever told you how kind and humble you are?
English
English
@oharalq @Simsimiyyah Y'all put salafi ghair muqallids to shame lol good job
English
@funfire5 @Simsimiyyah we dont care dude whoever has your view does not understand this religion
English
@Simsimiyyah @oharalq I don't see what's so hard to understand about this. Literally ask any Hanafi aalim, I learned this myself in a dars
English
@oharalq @Simsimiyyah @StudentOfAhmad There is Ijma on the Qadiyani sect being outside of Islam, anyone claiming to be a part of that sect wasn't even Muslim in the first place
English
@funfire5 @Simsimiyyah @StudentOfAhmad Wait so I thought laymen weren’t allowed to label people who claim ʾIslām to be kuffār?
English
@Simsimiyyah @oharalq You really need to start studying fiqh instead of spending your days takfiring lol
English
@oharalq @Simsimiyyah @StudentOfAhmad No, he's definitely a kafir lol. I knew you'd try to use this lame argument 😂
English
@funfire5 @Simsimiyyah Really? Can you let us know that according to you @StudentOfAhmad is someone you *don’t* label a kāfir, you refuse to do this yes?
English
@oharalq @Simsimiyyah You don't call a specific individual kafir, but like I said if you see kufr from someone you'd still treat them like a Kafir in all the ahkam shari'iyyah
English
@funfire5 @Simsimiyyah Really? So I can’t takfir anyone who claims ʾIslām? I can’t deem them a disbeliever?
English
@Simsimiyyah @oharalq Obviously I'm not saying to consider kufr to not be kufr, you'd still not pray behind a person who has kufr or eat his slaughter and so on, but calling an individual kafir is a whole different thing and requires the hukm of a Qadi.
English
English
Prophets are greater than non Prophets, so to suggest otherwise, if u were to believe Sayyidaħ Maryam عليها السلام was a Prophetess, is Kufr. I’d retract this.
hail.@redbridegroom
@T00_0pinionated yeah lady fatimah is superior to lady maryam even if the prophethood of lady maryam is hypothetically assumed. this is not me saying it, this is al-alusi saying it. i affirm this
Català
@oharalq @Simsimiyyah @fayyadreturns @redbridegroom Alr show me which madhab allows laymen to takfir specific individuals who claim Islam
English
@funfire5 @Simsimiyyah @fayyadreturns @redbridegroom not hanafi alhamdulilLah we follow the correct madhhab
Indonesia
@Simsimiyyah @fayyadreturns @oharalq @redbridegroom Since you’re supposedly Hanafi, I hope you know only the Qadi can takfir specific individuals claiming to be Muslim, not even normal Ulama…
vi@funfire5
@oharalq @fayyadreturns @redbridegroom You guys claim to follow a madhab and then disregard all the Fiqh of Takfir of the madhahib lol. Which madhab allows a layman to takfir specific individuals who call themselves Muslim?
English
English