pipermcq

128.3K posts

pipermcq banner
pipermcq

pipermcq

@pipermcq

There’s always more to the story, and the work to “Keep the Republic” has no quitting time.

USA Sumali Ocak 2009
3.7K Sinusundan3.5K Mga Tagasunod
pipermcq
pipermcq@pipermcq·
No one “lets it happen” here or anywhere. Schools have changed security procedures and design to make this much harder to do. But there is no magic wand to wave to make all the bad guns go bye. We can’t put something in the water to stop criminals from breaking laws. What we CAN do, policymakers refuse to do: allow for teachers and school employees who are willing to undergo the training to carry weapons at school; “man-trap” front doors and secure side entrances; vigilant and aggressive response to incidents as they develop; more aggressive identification and interdiction of those inclined to do this.
English
0
0
0
3
L Henneman
L Henneman@ColoradoandMore·
@pipermcq I’ve been to Wuhan. Sickest city I’ve ever visited.
English
1
0
1
4
pipermcq
pipermcq@pipermcq·
@ColoradoandMore @SonofLiberty357 Thanks for the heads-up— did a post on I’m a bit chagrined that I didn’t catch this critical detail. Thanks for setting me straight!!
English
0
0
1
1
L Henneman
L Henneman@ColoradoandMore·
@pipermcq @SonofLiberty357 I’m reading this interview is not about Iran, but the Russia Ukraine conflict. Someone dredged it up to smear Vance.
English
2
0
1
22
pipermcq
pipermcq@pipermcq·
The interview of JD Vance in which he mentioned the (true) notion that wars end with negotiation didn’t just air (as you may have thought). Nor did it have anything at all to do with Iran negotiations (thanks, @ColoradoandMore, for the heads-up on this). It aired in August, 2025. The subject was the Russia-Ukraine war and the (true) statement that it will need to be resolved by negotiations. It got little attention at the time. So— your assignment for this Sunday is to ponder the following: 1. Why would the (deceptively edited) clip be circulating just now? 2. Why did it get circulated by accounts who intimated it had to do with Iran negotiations? 3. Why did it gain virality now, when it didn’t before? 4. Who stands to gain from it being “boosted” now? 5. Were foreign actors involved in this disinfo campaign? You (and I) are being manipulated all the time. It is important to resist the effort. Even I made the mistake of thinking this was a recent interview. I have to redouble my efforts to not get played. This will all only get far, far, worse— especially if we allow it to work.
English
1
1
3
50
pipermcq
pipermcq@pipermcq·
@ColoradoandMore @SonofLiberty357 Oh- I hadn’t seen that. I assume it was related to Iran. It’s a tad early for the GOP 2028 oppo dumps— I wonder who was behind this dropping now?
English
0
0
0
12
pipermcq
pipermcq@pipermcq·
@CherylThaxton Of course not. Both she and Platner would be terrified of the subject.
English
0
0
0
1
CherylThaxton
CherylThaxton@CherylThaxton·
@pipermcq Do you think if he went on the program, she'd ask that question? Or press him on it?
English
1
0
0
12
pipermcq
pipermcq@pipermcq·
Welker is one of the better interviewers on that network, but it is a painfully low bar. And Fetterman’s point remains unaddressed. “We’ve invited him on the program.” Seriously? That’s what passes for journalism? Sheesh.
Jason Cohen 🇺🇸@JasonJournoDC

💥NEW: John Fetterman pushes Kristen Welker to press Graham Platner on s*xting scandal💥 “This is a guy that’s been dropping d*ck pics on Kik for a decade! … the ‘predators’ playground.’ Why can’t someone — perhaps YOU — ask him: ‘Why did you choose Kik!?’”

English
1
0
6
71
pipermcq
pipermcq@pipermcq·
Here’s the last comment I’ll make about Vance’s historically correct statement that WWII ended with “some sort” of negotiation: He was right. We negotiated from a position of immense strength by 1945, but we negotiated. Japan even set conditions we agreed to. But bringing it up in the context of the Iran discussions was inapt. There is no need to reflexively defend the notion of talks with Iran to end this conflict. But quit “selling” an agreement that has not yet been reached. It comes across as defensive and weak. Work the deal. Then describe it. In detail.
English
0
0
3
47
pipermcq
pipermcq@pipermcq·
@DolioJ The most hilarious part is that the Bobbies just yanked the mannequin’s arm off to effect the arrest of the protester. She didn’t think that part through.
English
0
0
0
12
pipermcq
pipermcq@pipermcq·
This is a fairly standard ploy for the Commie Wing of the DNC, for whom Bernie is the paterfamilias. They never work a legitimate job in their lives— like Bernie, they rely either on government paychecks or the kindness of strangers. But then, they “write a book.” Donors buy said book- by the tens of thousands. No one reads said book. But it’s a great way for big-money donors (and dark-money interests) to buy politicians. The politicians love the “book gambit,” because unlike a campaign contribution, no one tracks the “purchasers,” (so foreign interests can buy influence in the dark), and the politicians get to spend the income on themselves. All “legally.” Like Bernie here— who bought three homes and became a multi-millionaire. Because of his “books.”
End Wokeness@EndWokeness

Bernie on how he had the money to buy 3 homes: I sold anti-capitalist books Not satire

English
0
1
4
89
pipermcq nag-retweet
Teddy - PolyBackTest.com
Teddy - PolyBackTest.com@Bitcoin_Teddy·
Elon Musk: At GM, there's a special elevator only for senior executives. We have no such thing at Tesla. “I actually know the people on the line, because I worked on the line, I walked the line, I slept in the factory, and I worked beside them. So, I'm no stranger to them. There are many people at Tesla who have gone from working on the line to being in senior management. There are no lords and peasants. Everyone eats at the same table. Everyone parks in the same parking lot. At GM, there's a special elevator only for senior executives. We have no such thing at Tesla. We give everyone stock options. Many people who are just working the line, who didn't even know what stocks were, we've made them millionaires. And I just want to say that I'm incredibly appreciative of those who build the cars, and they know it.” New York Times DealBook Summit, 2023
English
55
1K
6.1K
162.4K
pipermcq
pipermcq@pipermcq·
As Santayana warned, “those who do not remember history are doomed to repeat it.” But here’s the PiperMcQ Corollary: “Those who DO remember history will be doomed to watch as the half-wits who do not outnumber us, and blunder forward ignorantly.” @MOneill225 is correct; Barry is not.
MO@MOneill225

@JoelWBerry This is ignorant. The formal surrender agreements were signed after the atomic bombs were dropped. Same for Germany and Italy. Read about the 1947 Paris Treaty. Although, heavily one-sided for the Allies, these agreements had some back and forth (negotiation). Vance is correct.

English
0
0
4
66
pipermcq
pipermcq@pipermcq·
@JoelWBerry His statement (that wars always end with “some kind” of negotiation) is historically accurate. Sometimes, such negotiations take place with one party thereto in a position of strength; sometimes not. But even WW II ended following negotiations for the surrender.
English
0
0
2
26
Western Lensman
Western Lensman@WesternLensman·
After livestreaming all day and night trying to see Trump’s name being removed from the Kennedy Center building, Jim Acosta exclaims: “This is very much like watching the Berlin Wall coming down." "It is a sign that humankind can stand up against tyranny." Holy hell. Just absolutely incredible journalisming.
English
1.5K
600
4.2K
380.6K