Rd2k

14.3K posts

Rd2k banner
Rd2k

Rd2k

@rd2k_

Trader

Sumali Haziran 2011
198 Sinusundan76 Mga Tagasunod
Rd2k
Rd2k@rd2k_·
@88888sAccount Banks are down 30% from highs.. they front ran this already. Time to buy
English
1
0
0
6
Rd2k nag-retweet
'47
'47@47·
Worth the wait.
English
60
1.2K
10.9K
1.1M
Fawken A. Mann
Fawken A. Mann@Fawken_A_Mann·
@MarketMaestro1 Always why TA folks pat themselves for a few good calls but never talk about the many bad ones….
English
1
0
1
141
MarketMaestro
MarketMaestro@MarketMaestro1·
Index posts: How are we managing the process? 1⃣ $QQQ $SPY
MarketMaestro tweet media
English
1
6
114
26.8K
Rd2k
Rd2k@rd2k_·
@zephyr_z9 $igv about to have a renaissance as investors realize value lies in the hyperscalers building end-to-end ecosystems & established enterprise software firms embedding agent abstraction
English
0
0
1
39
crebby bebii
crebby bebii@amateurlvl·
@CryptoParadyme $3.20 per litre? Dafuq i paid $3.10 in alice spring last week. I think hes lying.
English
2
0
0
122
derek guy
derek guy@dieworkwear·
Must feel so amazing right now to be a Vietnamese man in NYC named Nicks Nguyen and hearing the whole city chant your name
English
87
2.4K
56.5K
1.6M
ParraPower
ParraPower@parrapower2022·
$80,000 tax-free gain. Haters will focus on the $400,000 stamp duty. Winners focus on the headline. @_mumbling_me
ParraPower tweet mediaParraPower tweet media
English
21
10
188
23.5K
Rd2k
Rd2k@rd2k_·
$SPY GEX levels
Rd2k tweet media
HT
0
0
0
37
Rd2k
Rd2k@rd2k_·
@Glitch_Trades @SkylitAI How else would you monetize the brokerage portion of the business? Either subscription based (users won’t be a fan when there’s plenty of “free ones”, or sell data)
English
0
0
1
20
Glitch
Glitch@Glitch_Trades·
@rd2k_ @SkylitAI Existing brokers monetize by selling user data, I don’t like that and don’t think that is ‘for the people’
English
1
0
3
108
Glitch
Glitch@Glitch_Trades·
In order to go full autonomous agentic trading via @SkylitAI, we would need our own brokerage. This will happen / come eventually. Not a matter of if, but when.
English
14
3
239
17.2K
Rd2k
Rd2k@rd2k_·
@Glitch_Trades @SkylitAI Decent was prob the wrong word, there’s plenty of excellent brokerages. Excited for what’s in the pipeline anyway
English
0
0
1
13
Rd2k
Rd2k@rd2k_·
@MrsZ_Flow Show lower nodes also for full context
English
0
0
0
6
Mrs Z
Mrs Z@MrsZ_Flow·
Matrix maps. Let’s pretend last week didn’t happen. No panicans 🥂
Mrs Z tweet media
GIF
English
4
5
33
6.4K
Rd2k
Rd2k@rd2k_·
@capnpope @MoneyPrinter0x Software sell off was largely due to AI concerns, and that tools could be developed to completely replicate/replace old SaaS tools. With the neutering of Anthropic, this belief starts to reverse.
English
0
0
0
15
MP
MP@MoneyPrinter0x·
think that anthropic's fable ban might mean revert quite a few of the saas names
MP tweet media
English
12
1
104
16.4K
RJC
RJC@RJCcapital·
this Anthropic news is so bullish for $SNDK
English
39
8
451
137.1K
Gnotz (Bull)
Gnotz (Bull)@BullTradeFinder·
Give me some heatmap suggestions! Ill get to posting them
English
69
0
51
9.3K
Hustler2max
Hustler2max@Reignrx·
@BullTradeFinder I made it myself. Lot cheaper than skylit. Here another example of MU. And its work just as good as skylit.
Hustler2max tweet mediaHustler2max tweet media
English
6
0
7
249
Rd2k nag-retweet
David Sacks
David Sacks@DavidSacks·
I’ve had a number of conversations with folks inside and outside government about the current situation with Anthropic, and here is what I believe to be true: — As we know, Anthropic publicly released its Mythos class models earlier this week under the commercial name Fable. — Fable is Mythos with guardrails. But if those guardrails fail, then you’ve exposed Mythos and its advanced cyber capabilities to people who shouldn’t have them. (Keep in mind that Anthropic itself widely promoted the idea that Mythos was a cyberweapon and needed to be regulated as such. They asked for government regulation of Mythos and championed the guardrails on Fable. If there is a vulnerability — big or small — it is Anthropic’s responsibility to patch.) — A highly credible trusted partner of both Anthropic and the USG who was testing Fable came forward with a jailbreak of those guardrails. The Admin asked Dario to fix the jailbreak or de-deploy the model. Dario refused. — In their blog post, Anthropic defended its decision by saying the jailbreak isn’t serious. That is not what the trusted partner and the USG believe; nor is that kind of minimizing language consistent with Anthropic’s brand as the AI safety company. It’s difficult to fathom how they could claim a jailbreak allowing operability of a cyber weapon could be defined as not “serious.” — In the past, Anthropic has always said that safety must be top priority and taken super seriously. In this case, Anthropic prioritized the continued offering of the consumer model over safety. — In reaction, the Admin issued the export control. The Admin did this reluctantly. It’s been very surprised that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to cooperate with a reasonable safety request (ie fixing the jailbreak issue). Anthropic’s reaction is very much at odds with their branding and ethos as a safe AI research community. — The Admin’s hope now is that Anthropic remediates the safety issue, the export control is lifted, and Fable goes back into general release. The Admin wants all of this to happen as soon as possible. It is frankly bewildered that Anthropic hasn’t wanted to comply with safety requests that it previously said were its highest priority. — Those trying to misdirect and tie this action to the prior DoW/Anthropic issues are wrong. The Admin values Anthropic’s technical capabilities and feels that this issue, while serious, should be easily resolved. The ball is in Anthropic’s court.
English
2.2K
3.2K
25.2K
7.6M
Ansem
Ansem@blknoiz06·
robostrategy is easiest way to get long an industry that will 100x over the next 3-5 years
DaddyPatrick@patrickthedaddy

honestly been sitting on this for a while before posting but here it goes the robotics space is at an inflection point that most people are completely missing. everyone's talking about AI, everyone's talking about SpaceX, and yeah those are real - but both are essentially priced in at this point. you're not getting in early on anthropic. that ship sailed. what's NOT priced in is humanoid robotics. figure and apptronik are the two serious US players and their combined valuation was sitting below cardano six months ago. cardano. a chain that has been a ghost town since 2020. let that sink in for a second. now i'm not here to tell anyone what to buy but $BOT (robostrategy) has been on my radar for a while and the thesis is actually pretty clean. it's essentially a vehicle that gives you pre-IPO exposure to these companies with actual liquidity - no 7 year lockup, no being stuck at a 60% discount if you need to exit. that alone separates it from most VC-adjacent plays retail ever gets access to. the NAV premium people complain about is based on last year's funding rounds. figure and apptronik are raising again, probably sooner than most expect, and those rounds are not coming in lower. when that happens the math on $BOT flips pretty fast. robotics hasn't had its ChatGPT moment yet. that's the whole point. when it does, and it will, the window you had to position beforehand is gone. every major bull run has that one sector where people look back and say "it was so obvious." i think this is it for the next cycle. not financial advice, do your own research, all that. just think more people should be paying attention

English
139
55
1.1K
389.4K