Tweetodee

Watching #Savannah return 2 #Today in her yellow dress & big smile, I feel nauseous, literally! If my mom were missing there's no way I'd stop searching 2go back to work! #NancyGuthrie deserved more: more $ for info & ransom, more time on the ground!😠😢 tmz.com/2026/04/06/sav…

@RepNancyMace You are getting there Ms. Mace.

If the last few weeks are any indication, it’s less about right vs. left and more about right vs. wrong.

@ChristopherHale Jimmy said something similar.⬇️ He was our most sincerely Christian President in recent memory imo.

.@JamesTalarico: For 50 years, the religious right convinced our fellow Christians that the most important issues were abortion and gay marriage—two issues that aren't mentioned in the Bible. Jesus tells us exactly how we're going to be judged: by feeding the hungry, by healing the sick, and by welcoming the stranger. Don’t tell me what you believe. Show me how you treat other people, and I’ll tell you what you believe. Jesus gave us two commandments: love God and love neighbor. There was no exception to that second commandment regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, immigration status, or religious affiliation.

@RepThomasMassie @HasanKhxnx ❤️

@HasanKhxnx I am not suicidal. I eat healthy food. The brakes on my car and truck are in good shape. I practice good trigger discipline and never point a gun at anyone, including myself. There are no deep pools of water on my farm and I’m a pretty good swimmer.

Can you, the people, “vote your way out of this?” Honestly, not if you get your news from these folks. The swamp has tricks for deceiving the public, and most even work on congressmen. Here’s an example of how Laura and Greg played along as happy tools of the swamp. Please ask yourself why your own congressman has never talked about this. He either hasn’t gotten this far in the game (80% chance), or he likes the way the swamp obscures what’s going on (10% chance), or he dislikes the system but the price he’d pay for telling you is too high (10% chance). If a congressman sees this post and wants to debate me, I accept! The House has rules we adopt at the beginning of each Congress. Honestly we should just use those - some go all the way back to Thomas Jefferson. Some are like Robert’s Rules of Order which branched from House rules a century ago. But we have a rules committee that modifies the rules every week. I served on the rules committee for two years. When I was on the committee, I refused to vote for rules changes if the purpose was to mislead or obscure. Every week, the rules committee bends the rules to suit the Speaker, but you can’t place the blame just on the committee or the Speaker. Every rules change must be approved by the whole House with a majority vote. Rank and file congressmen are told to vote for these rules modifications each week for the sake of party loyalty because the rules are temporarily modified by the majority to keep the minority from using the permanent rules against us. This is partly true, so most congressmen never question beyond this. Typically, every week the rules committee meets before other committees and writes a rules package to protect bills that will come to the floor that week. Then the whole house votes on this rules package early in the week before significant legislation comes to the floor. The vote is typically on party lines. Sometimes a block of congressmen in the majority will take the rules package hostage and withhold their vote to get something else that has nothing to do with the rules. I’m not a big fan of this, but after 13 years, my hands aren’t completely clean of this tactic. The high-road position that I try to maintain is that if the rules package is bad, you shouldn’t vote for the rules package, and in general you shouldn’t withhold your vote from a rules package if there’s nothing wrong with the rules package… even if you disagree with the policy that is enabled to come to the floor by the rules package. There are more details, but that’s all you need to know to understand what I’m going to explain next. This week the Speaker wanted to do two things outside of our base rules, so he put those inside of the rules package that also had the rules for bringing bills like the popular SAVE Act to the floor, knowing members would be afraid to vote against something associated with SAVE. THIS IS INTENTIONAL. The Speaker wanted to circumvent the National Emergencies Act of 1976 to avoid voting on tariffs and he wanted to turn off the ban on bringing a spending bill to the floor the same day it’s introduced. The first rules package that came to the floor this week failed because myself and other republicans objected to it. The rules committee met again, wrote a new rules package without the tariff-trick, and we voted on the second rules package. I voted no but internet goons, like clockwork, characterized this as a vote against the SAVE Act. The swamp used that second rules package to give them authority to pass a bill before anyone could read it. They hid that authority inside the rule for the SAVE act because they knew people like Laura and Greg would help them disparage anyone who didn’t go along. If you fell for Laura and Greg’s slop you were cheering for the Pelosi doctrine that we should pass bills to see what’s in them. If the rules package had failed, the rules committee would have written a better one and SAVE Act would have still come to the floor.

@SInow 10

Thoughts??

@BrianEntin Thank you

FBI and Deputies have again left Nancy Guthrie’s house.

@BrianEntin Thank you for your good reporting. It is appreciated.

Pima County Sheriff says no press conferences today or interviews. Working a few other angles.

@smi15913049 @BrianEntin Thank you for sharing.

@BrianEntin Looks like the mom had a solar camera. Investigators have a long ladder right now. Drone coverage.

The second note went to KOLD tv station in Tucson. They say: the IP address is NOT the same IP address as the initial note, but it appears the sender used the same type of secure server to hide their IP address. The new note contains something the senders seem to think will prove to investigators they’re the same people who sent the first note.

@SF_investigates ❤️

Gideon has been found alive!! Thank you everyone for helping to spread awareness.

@SF_investigates Thank you for your good work.❤️ My heart goes out to his family and friends.

Yesterday, on the third day of searching, I located missing veteran Chuck Morris on a mountain in Agoura Hills, California. Sadly, he was deceased. My heart breaks for his family and friends. I am truly sorry this did not end differently, and I wish them peace. #SAR

@SF_investigates 🙏❤️

I am heading out to search for missing man Chuck Morris, last seen in Agoura Hills, CA on 12-15-25. facebook.com/groups/2628306…

@SF_investigates ❤️

I got home after 15 days involved in a massive search along the Appalachian Trail, and it was quite defeating to leave without the lost hiker who is still somewhere on the mountain. A few days ago, I took on a new case here in California involving a family searching for a loved one who is living willfully within homeless communities due to mental illness. His mother was placed in hospice care, and she and her son are very close, the family wanted him to have a chance to say goodbye. Today, I was able to locate him, explain what was happening, and put him on a call with his family, who were gathered at their mother’s bedside. She was not conscious, but the entire family, and the man himself, were deeply moved. I could see how much being able to say goodbye to his mom meant to him and to everyone involved. I truly love what I do. Some cases unfortunately take months, years, or even decades to solve, but I will keep going back until they are all home.

@RachelEReilly I'm sorry you're hurting. Love and hugs to you. ❤️

Literally a mom of 2 kids who is out here trying to do the best job I can. Trying to give my kids a good life and provide them with a future and healthy food on the table. And for some boy child to come at me bc he was on a show with me- call me names and act like it’s ok is so disrespectful and gross. I’ve been nothing but nice I don’t talk bad about him esp not on a podcast - I’ve done this 15years so trying to tear me down bc of your insecurities sure -but you’ll never be where I am bc of this type of behavior . #bb27 #bigbrother

@SF_investigates 🙏

“What’s done in the dark will come to the light.” Tomorrow morning, I have been “ordered” to appear in Los Angeles County Criminal Court for an Order to Show Cause hearing for contempt. I was not served with a summons to appear in court. I was not given a complaint outlining the alleged contempt to respond to. There is no case number, and I do not appear anywhere on the court’s public docket. I was handed a handwritten note from a Deputy District Attorney on Friday and told to appear Tuesday morning. A punishment hearing in criminal court that is not even assigned a case number, seemingly because they do not want this to be public information. Love me or hate me, this should concern you. The fact that this is happening in our criminal court system is terrifying. That is why I am going public before the hearing tomorrow, which I will not be attending, so that the public and the press are aware of what is happening. Here is the backstory. Recently, I testified on two separate days as a witness before a grand jury. When I was served with the subpoena for the first day of testimony, two detectives came to my door at 6 a.m. and instructed me to immediately call the Deputy District Attorney. She told me that because I was now a grand jury witness, I was no longer allowed to speak about this case and that it would be illegal if I did. This put me in an impossible position. I have a client directly related to this case. If I cannot speak to my client, I am violating my professional duty. This was the entire point of calling me as a grand jury witness. It was a strategy used to try to silence me. The Los Angeles County Medical Examiner has publicly spoken about a similar silencing strategy being attempted against their office. Then I did my research on the law, spoke to lawyers, and found out I was being lied to. Here is the critical fact. In California, witnesses to a grand jury do not have a general obligation of secrecy. That obligation applies to the jurors and officers of the court. A witness is only bound to secrecy regarding anything they learn solely from the grand jury proceeding. It does not apply to anything they already knew before testifying or anything learned outside the grand jury. I want to pause here because many people are going to search this online, and Google AI is likely going to give them the wrong answer by claiming that witnesses must remain completely silent. If you click through to the actual sources it cites, you will see that the AI summary is incorrect. California law is silent on imposing total secrecy on witnesses. Instead, witnesses are routinely admonished that they may not disclose certain things, but those “certain things” only include what was learned from the grand jury proceeding itself, not independent knowledge or publicly known facts. In 1983, the California Attorney General issued a written opinion on this exact issue for legal clarification. It is very clear. I have attached screenshots of that opinion. I also want to be very clear about this. I never disclosed my testimony, even though the law would have allowed me to discuss my own testimony. I never publicly disclosed that I was a witness before the grand jury, not once and not twice. Instead, the Deputy District Attorney abused the power of the grand jury process in an apparent attempt to silence me. I was told that I broke the law, and I was given a handwritten note telling me to appear in criminal court for a contempt hearing. There is no summons. There is no case number. The matter does not appear on the public docket. There is no documentation outlining what I am accused of so that I can respond. I was also told that if I left town, I had to be back by Tuesday morning. I wrote a detailed letter to both the judge and the Deputy District Attorney explaining my position. They have had that letter since Friday afternoon. I received no response. With a hearing just hours away and the threat of a contempt charge hanging over my head in what appears to be a secret, off-the-books court proceeding, I had no choice but to go public so that the people and the press are aware of what is happening. This is the only way I can protect myself from what I believe to be an abuse of power. It is frightening that this is happening at the highest levels of our court system. There is power in transparency. I was left no choice.

@GavinNewsom 😂🤣

WOW!

@SF_investigates 🙏

@SenWhitehouse Thank you

Trump didn’t send a single US official to COP this year, because he thinks climate change is a hoax. I disagree — so I’m here on my own.

@chefjoseandres @WCKitchen Thank you!

In Gaza, our @WCKitchen teams do more than cook. They build kitchens... drive aid trucks... deliver supplies to our chefs and hot meals to the people. Challenge after challenge, our teams always find a way to feed people... bringing nourishment and dignity. Today 542k meals cooked and served plus hundreds of thousands of bread and water!

🚨 *Breaking News* Robby Roadsteamer has been detained by ICE Portland after singing Rod Stewart with the Portland Frog! We need your help! Please RT and support Robby's campaign and lawyer fees at robbyroadsteamer.com 💙🦒🦒🦒