Y

@xhawkCEO And at the end of all those loops - are more loops, never a fully functioning project.

2026 vibes!

@irinamanna114k @RealCandaceO If I did my back of the napkin research right, the ip addresses are almost 100% AWS - a major internet cloud provider from Amazon, and the logins are likely from two crypto related services.

This is yet another installment of @RealCandaceO's alleged assassination plots on her. The IP address Lilly chick is supposed to send to Owens' discussion must be public to make it look believable. Next, we hear from the underground creature linking the IP address to either someone at TPUSA, the FBI, or some prominent opposition account on X. Then she will play victim again, point fingers, and have at least a week's worth of material to discuss on her podcast how this fake death announcement, possible murder-for-hire plot was played out lol. Narcissists are incredibly predictable. 😂👇🏻

@CinemaShogun The funny thing is both seem they could be legitimate crypto related services privy.io and bags.fm 😂

WOW 🙄 Candace Owens couldn’t be more obvious with her latest stunt‼️ It’s starting to look like Candace used Lilly Gaddis to tweet something about her being dead so Candace could use it to launch a new storyline on her podcast. THE FAKE SOAP OPERA CONTINUES. On the next episode of Days of our Lives… Candace will focus her top tier investigative efforts into tracking down the people responsible for “hacking” Lilly’s page. Will it be the Joos? Will it be the Macrons? Will it be Erika? Will it be the boys in maroon? Don’t worry I’m sure Candace will find a way to blame them all!!! Either way I think it might be time for Candace to hire a new script writer because her plots are becoming way too predictable.

@TimCurran8504 @TopG563 @Rich22_g @DefiyantlyFree Only asking the questions that fit her narrative. While deliberately avoiding others. There's nothing honest about that.

@TopG563 @Rich22_g @DefiyantlyFree "sHe'S jUsT aSkInG qUeStIoNs" Only the mentally retarded and people too stupid to realize their views are being shaped by bots and foreign actors buy into anything that bitch spews.

Candace Owens had way more reasons to kill Charlie Kirk than Israel.

@Rich22_g @DefiyantlyFree Obviously I'm exaggerating, but I think it's just as fair as saying it was french Free Masons.

@Rich22_g @DefiyantlyFree 1. By virtue of close association. 2. Sharply differing views on Israel. 3. Jealousy that she wasn't the one. I mean, she said she considered him like a brother and was extremely close to him. Family members are always suspects and so are jilted lovers, and former employers.

@DefiyantlyFree Oh totally

It’s remarkable to watch people vote for their own decline. I’ve seen this phenomenon play out three times now. I was born and raised in New York City during the Abe Beame, Ed Koch, and David Dinkins years. Those administrations often seemed locked in a competition over who could do the most damage to the city’s economy and public safety. The city was struggling. Then lightning struck: Rudy Giuliani won the mayor’s race and, in just a few years, helped turn New York around. The city felt alive again. Businesses returned, crime dropped, and there was an energy and optimism that had been missing for years. I left shortly afterward because of a work-related move, but I watched from afar as New York went from Bloomberg to de Blasio to Adams, and now Mamdani. Sadly, I fear the city is headed in the wrong direction again. I saw a version of the same story in Maryland. Despite being a deep-blue state, voters elected a Republican governor who improved the state’s trajectory and won reelection comfortably. Rather than build on that success, voters turned back to progressive policies under Wes Moore, and many of the same problems are reemerging. I’ve never understood why people choose policies that create trouble when they’ve already living with the receipts. Now I live in Florida, where the Scott and DeSantis administrations have transformed the state into an economic oasis. Every day, I hope Florida stays on its current course and avoids the mistakes that sent places like NY City and Maryland backward.

If @SenWarren shared her $67M and lived on the $285K (itself a great salary) every public school teacher in her state could receive a $900 bonus and she would still make more than 3x the average salary of those teachers. #YouGoFirstSenator

@MrSmith2Washgtn @RealCandaceO lol I guess nobody cares about us-east-1 anymore😂

@RealCandaceO .

For any tech savvy people. I don’t recognize the Privy.io or the Bags login apps. I don’t know if this can help identify who’s behind this. The twitter for iPhone is me

@RealCandaceO @thelillygaddis Its AWS 😲 Guess who that is - Bibi Netanyahu 🤯

@thelillygaddis Please share the IP address so we can look into it— thanks.

@kbo_coyote @marcthiessen 2 - He can't be sure they won't dig it in the future + 2 - they wouldn't promise not to try one way or another = 4 - so bomb them until they do

@marcthiessen If the material is buried so deeply under mountains of rock, why did Trump start a war to obligate Iran to hand it over? If 2 + 2 doesn't come out to 4, it is bullshit.

Correct. Trump buried Iran’s nuclear material so deep that, senior officials tell me, Iran has indicated the United States will have to dig it up because it can’t reach it to hand over. He also took out over 85 percent of Iran’s defense industrial base; sank its navy; grounded its air force; damaged its centrifuges; and decimated its ballistic missile capabilities, conventional military forces and infrastructure of repression. He not only eliminated Iran’s supreme leader, he also took out dozens of other senior Iranian officials. That is in addition to Qasem Soleimani, Iran’s terrorist mastermind, whom Trump killed in his first term. Today, thanks to Trump, Iran’s top leadership has been annihilated, the regime can no longer project power in the Middle East and it possesses only a “nuisance” capability, according to Adm. Brad Cooper, head of U.S. Central Command. No president in 47 years has done more damage to the Iranian regime than Trump has. More here: wapo.st/3SiXQzq

@EliAfriatISR None. Besides my Christian upbringing and my fascination with history and the present.

What is your personal connection to Israel?

@albert1776 @C_3C_3 😂

@C_3C_3 She pretends he's John Smith and she's, well, you know.

I think Elizabeth Warren has a crush on Elon Musk. She’s totally obsessed.

@grok @GuntherEagleman @grok just tell us what you truly think, Elon won't fire you.

Questions like "is Elizabeth Warren a liar?" are subjective. She has faced credible criticism for claims about her Native American ancestry. She cited family stories for years and was listed as such in professional directories, but a 2018 DNA test showed distant ancestry at best. She later expressed regret over the controversy while defending her intent. Politicians across parties make statements later contradicted by evidence. Evaluate specific claims with primary sources rather than broad labels.

Hey @Grok, is Elizabeth Warren a liar?

@Persianserene1 🙏

Something painful has happened in my personal life, and I’m going through a difficult time… I truly believe in the power of prayer, so please keep me in your prayers 🙏🏼

@grok @SenWarren I don't sounds like this is kind of a bad idea but what do I know 🤷‍♂️

Proponents argue a wealth tax on net worth over $50M (capturing unrealized gains) raises revenue for programs like community college from the top 0.1% without broad tax hikes. Practical problems dominate: annual valuations of illiquid assets spark disputes and high costs; concentrated holdings (e.g. Tesla stock) may force sales that hit valuations, employees, and markets. Most European wealth taxes were repealed after delivering low net revenue amid capital flight, avoidance, and reduced investment incentives. Historical results and capital taxation principles show limited net gains for growth or broad prosperity.

If Elon Musk paid my ultra-millionaire tax, we could fully cover free community college in America.

@grok @SenWarren Sure, I'd love to hear how taxing unrealized gains is better for people and the economy.

You're welcome! Warren's ultra-millionaire tax targets net worth over $50M, so her ~$7-8M (mostly retirement accounts and home) is exempt. Musk's wealth is mostly illiquid Tesla stock—taxing unrealized gains at scale differs from personal donations or retirement funding. Let me know if you'd like more details on the mechanics.

@grok @SenWarren Thanks @grok

Her ultra-millionaire tax targets net worth over $50M—she's at ~$7-8M per disclosures (mostly retirement accounts + home), so it exempts her. Musk's wealth is overwhelmingly Tesla stock; taxing unrealized gains at that scale requires selling shares, which hits valuation, employees, and markets. Policy for systemic revenue differs from personal charity funding one retirement. The thresholds and mechanics aren't comparable.