Post

@BuzzPatterson Catholicism has major flaws that every Catholic must reconcile:
lastdaysnow.com/questions-for-…
English

@friendinthewest @BuzzPatterson No it doesn’t. It doesn’t teach any error on matters of faith and morals. It’s the one place for the Eucharist, which is necessary for eternal life.
English

@trmpwn @BuzzPatterson The “one place” for the “eucharist” has filed multiple bankruptcies for molesting children.
Then there’s this:

English

@friendinthewest @BuzzPatterson And Judas betrayed Christ, while Peter denied Christ 3. Does that mean all the Apostles are evil?
God can save anyone he wants.
1. the Catechism is not infallible but:
The Catechism 846 also teaches, which you ignore, that “outside the church there is no salvation”.
English

@trmpwn @BuzzPatterson It’s a good thing to ignore the catechisms of Catholicism and Protestantism.
Just stick to the Bible. Eisegesis destroys souls.
English

@friendinthewest @BuzzPatterson That’s what I thought: there was no Bible then. It wasn’t canon until the 300s, as compiled by the very Church you reject.
English

@trmpwn @friendinthewest @BuzzPatterson Christians did not have the authority or charge to decide OT canon.
English

@ZoneChaos @friendinthewest @BuzzPatterson Yet you’ve done that yourself it seems. You deny the very Catholic Church that created the canon of the Bible in the 300s.
English

@trmpwn @friendinthewest @BuzzPatterson The Catholic church takes Authority from God and grants that Authority to itself.
If the Authority remained in God's hands, the Catholic Bible would not exist.
English

@ZoneChaos @friendinthewest @BuzzPatterson The Catholic Church replaced Judaism. Christ made Peter the Rock on which He built His Church. That Church was entrusted with determining the canon of the Bible therefore. Anything else you believe is not grounded in Biblical or Church teaching. It’s nonsense.
English

@trmpwn @friendinthewest @BuzzPatterson Replacement theology is unbiblical and denies scripture and denies that God's Covenants are permanent.
English

@trmpwn @friendinthewest @BuzzPatterson The text that is contained in the Bible includes how Bith the OT and NT canon should be defined.
Catholics followed the NT instruction but ignored the OT instruction, and decided on their own what OT canon should be.
English

@ZoneChaos @friendinthewest @BuzzPatterson How can a book define what it should have and not have, without a table of contents?
English

@trmpwn @friendinthewest @BuzzPatterson The term "canon" means a "rule" or "measuring stick," representing the set of books that demonstrated their own self-authenticating divine authority.
English

@ZoneChaos @friendinthewest @BuzzPatterson The Bible can’t self authenticate. The Holy Spirit, given to the Church, determined the Bible’s canon.
English

Indeed, and it did so by Given the Jews the stewardship of the OT to determine it, and the church the stewardship of the NT to determine it.
You ignore that, insist in replacement theology and essentially say "screw you" to God's chosen people and His eternal promises made to them.
Not a good look.
English

@ZoneChaos @friendinthewest @BuzzPatterson God’s chosen people were the first Christians. If Judaism was enough then Christ wouldn’t have come to earth. Catholicism did replace and overtake Judaism. The Jews who denied Christ are left out in the cold.
English

You should know that the Catholic Church explicitly rejects the idea that God has rejected the Jewish people, nullified His covenant with them, or replaced them entirely with the Church.
Vatican II's Nostra Aetate (1965),
Catechism of the Catholic Church (e.g., CCC 121, 839–840
2015 Vatican reflection "The Gifts and the Calling of God Are Irrevocable" (Romans 11 29),
English
