FairToken.Fun

$SOL is beating $ETH in every aspect, lol.

> binance announces an issue with stablecoin pricing feed > literally says when they'll fix it (in the future), allowing room for anyone to exploit it > someone (or binance themselves do it) exploits > biggest crash ever in crypto > multiple coins go to 0 > entirety of retail gets destroyed > binance probably made billions and billions with it "while others attack competitors" funny to say this when CZ and Binance have been actively attacking Hyperliquid while this whole thing happened is prob their fault I am never speaking about binance again and will never have a single dollar there starting today, that's for sure

Despite the unprecedented price action, we’re happy to confirm that Kamino users incurred a total of $0 bad debt, and that the liquidation engine performed exactly as expected. Kamino’s risk and liquidation systems are designed to weather the worst. Though it’s a silver lining amongst the pain, we’re proud that Kamino was able, and continues to keep users safe. In-depth liquidation report to follow. Stay safe, degens.

Over the last hour, Solana's network demonstrated resilience under extreme demand: - Raw transactions spiked to 6-10k per second - Utilization reached up near 60 CUs per block - Median transaction fees remained low

Grok, is there a fued between CZ of Binance and Solana? @grok: Yes, there appears to be an ongoing feud between Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the founder of Binance, and Solana, primarily driven by competitive tensions between the BNB Chain and Solana ecosystems. This isn't a direct personal spat with Solana's leadership but rather a broader rivalry fueled by CZ's public comments, perceived market manipulations, and efforts to boost BNB at Solana's expense. The friction has roots in the 2022 FTX collapse but has intensified in 2025 amid meme coin dominance and market share battles. Key Points of the Feud Historical Context (2022 FTX Drama): The feud traces back to CZ's public criticism of FTX and its founder Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), which contributed to FTX's downfall. Solana (SOL) was heavily backed by FTX, and CZ's actions led to massive SOL sell-offs by Binance, crashing its price. This created lasting resentment in the Solana community, with some viewing CZ's moves as targeted sabotage rather than risk management. Recent Escalations (2025):Meme Coin Wars: Solana has dominated meme coin trading (e.g., via platforms like Pump.fun), but CZ has aggressively pushed BNB Chain as a rival. In early October 2025, CZ reacted to a post mocking BNB's lack of "innovative" memes compared to Solana, sparking community backlash. This led to cross-chain meme launches like $INNOVATIVE and $PVP, designed to troll the rivalry. Allegations of Suppression: In August 2025, accusations surfaced that Binance (via market maker Wintermute) was deliberately suppressing SOL's price to prevent it from surpassing BNB's market cap (~$120B vs. ~$110B at the time). Binance's proof-of-reserves showed minimal SOL holdings, fueling conspiracy theories. CZ's Direct Digs: During recent Spaces and posts, CZ implied Solana's hype was only possible because he was "distracted" by legal battles (e.g., his 2023 plea deal). He also proposed slashing BNB gas fees by 3-10x to "crush" Solana and Ethereum on cost-efficiency. On October 7, 2025, CZ celebrated BNB Chain's meme surge, noting it now holds 11.4% of global meme activity closing in on Ethereum and eroding Solana's lead. Community Beef: X (Twitter) is rife with posts calling it a "beef between ecosystems," with Solana users accusing CZ of "butthurt" over FTX's past support for SOL, and BNB fans mocking Solana's outages and rugs. CZ's Broader Influence: Even from "prison" in 2024 (a low-security facility), CZ's X account followed Solana news accounts, hinting at ongoing interest. Post-release, he's pivoted to AI and meme incentives on BNB, like rewards for top memes, which some see as a direct counter to Solana's degen culture. Is It One-Sided? Mostly from CZ's side—he's vocal about BNB's superiority—but Solana's community fires back hard, with memes and posts amplifying the divide. No outright lawsuits or cease-fires, but it's heating up as BNB gains ground (e.g., daily meme volumes rivaling Solana's). Healthy competition? Sure. Full-blown feud? Absolutely, per the crypto trenches.

@MarktQuant U make wrong predictions every time.

$ETH is now the 2nd dominant major. $SOL lost it's 2nd place and now it has a short signal. Short term weakness or a consolidating phase for $SOL I would assume.

Except SOL, everything else is noise.

All major L2s, including Arbitrum, Base & Optimism, have admin keys! Controlled by a "security council" (multi-sig) CHOSEN by the L2... (permissioned authority) The opposite of decentralization! The admin key CAN steal all funds INSTANTLY by changing the smart contract's rules

@MarktQuant What’s ur target for $SOL

🔺Dominant Asset Rotation System Dominant Asset: 1. 🟣 $SOL 2.🟠 $BTC Exposure suggestions: 🐅100% $SOL 🦍70% $SOL/ 30% $BTC 🐢50% $SOL/ 50% $BTC

@j0hnwang @solana This is due to additional tokens circulating due to unlocks.

Liquidation Levels - 3am Sept 18th x.com/i/broadcasts/1… youtube.com/watch?v=TMjota…

The safest way to earn SOL and to stop your bags from melting away to inflation is to stake SOL natively i.e without using an LST because, not tax advice, but there are many regions where swapping from SOL to a SOL LST is a taxable event Helius: i) gives you top native yield ii) does this without deliberately slowing down the network and shitting on the chain for everyone to farm a few bps (looking at you Kiln and a few others) we are *strictly* IBRL aligned iii) is one of only 2 Solana native teams in the Top 30 to fend off against giant corporations who could not care less iv) has a bald founder v) uses the stake to help Solana devs and builders vi) has partnerships with many leading teams (Pengu and Doodle TGEs also airdropped to Helius stakers for example)

@sreeramkannan 😂

Unstaking period in ethereum. Feature not a bug. TLDR: ETH consensus is exceptionally well designed prioritizing worst case safety and liveness and hence correctly chose conservative parameters. It’s possible to reduce it from months to a week with a single parameter change. Ethereum security is built on staking AND slashing, unlike other chains. If a group of stakers can attack the network and unstake *before* slashing (time-to-slash), then the network loses security. So unstaking cannot be instantaneous. For double signing, it is objectively verifiable and hence slashing can be triggered relatively instantly after double signing is observed. The time to observe double signing depends on assumptions about network conditions - how long can I keep Binance and coinbase thinking their version of the block is correct before realizing they have different blocks. This can be a few hours or a day at worst case. If the node was not live, there is an inactivity leak “slashing”. This is automated and done every block so time-to-slash = 1 block. Inactivity leak happens over weeks. The problem is: if you were not live at the time inactivity leak happens, it is hard to verify the correctness. In an extreme case, it is possible there are two different forks each claiming the other group of validators were malicious / not live and hence they are slashed in the other fork. Ethereum makes a weak assumption that nodes that are offline still wake up every few *months* can still find the correct fork in ethereum which is why the unstaking period is kept to months. Instead of having a fixed long unstaking period, ethereum engineered its exit queue to be instantaneous if only a small amount of stake withdrew in a given period. But if lot of stake wants to withdraw the queue builds up - worst case to several months. By making a stronger assumption that nodes are online every week for example, it’s possible to make worst case unstaking period to a week. Most other chains neither have slashing for safety nor liveness and yolo unstake instantly. That is a bug not a feature.

Solana stablecoins catching up to ETH and will easily flip ETH in 5 years. Tom Lee is wrong on this one.

@JourneyMacro 😂

There is no "more obvious" trade than to hodl ETH for the next 10 years. It's literally hitting us in the face that tokenization is the next financial system and Ethereum is the only blockchain with built in redundancy and zero downtime. Anyone selling ETH here is cursed with blindness IMHO.

@materkel @GadgetLeo They are just staking, for DATs.

@GadgetLeo SOL into Solana DeFi

I'm already a bit anxious about ETH DATs putting significant portions of their ETH into DeFi, and these guys want to do this with SOL... into apps that are significantly less battle-proven? Yeah, DATs will definitely become the Luna/FTX of this cycle.

@emmettgallic @FWDind @coinbase So 0.6B money left?

UPDATE: Forward Industries (@FWDind) has now acquired more than $1 Billion Dollars in Solana Galaxy Digital has carried out over $1B in purchases via Binance and Bybit to acquire over 4.7M $SOL now custodied at @coinbase.

A list of the top 10 L2s; a dystopian nightmare of centralization: 🧵 Arbitrum - Can steal all user funds instantly through a multi-sig. A centralized operator can exploit MEV & centralized sequencer can censor. A resource exhaustion attack can also steal Base - Can steal all user funds instantly through a multi-sig, a centralized operator can exploit MEV & the centralized sequencer can censor. There is no exit window Optimism - Can steal all user funds instantly through a multi-sig, a centralized operator can exploit MEV & the centralized sequencer can censor. There is no exit window Linea - Can steal all user funds instantly through a multi-sig. A permissioned proposer can also steal all user funds & freeze funds. A centralized operator can exploit MEV. The centralized sequencer can also censor & freeze user funds. There is no exit window ZKsync Era - Can steal all user funds instantly through a multi-sig. A permissioned proposer can also steal all user funds & censor. A centralized operator can exploit MEV & the centralized sequencer can censor. If the Gateway settlement rollup is exploited, it would also allow all users' funds to be stolen instantly. A bug in the proof system could also lead to a loss of user funds. There is no exit window Unichain - Can steal all user funds instantly through a multi-sig, a centralized operator can exploit MEV & the centralized sequencer can censor. There is no exit window Starknet - Can steal all user funds instantly through a multi-sig, a centralized operator can exploit MEV, freeze & censor. The centralized sequencer can censor & freeze user funds. There is no exit window Katana - Can steal all user funds instantly through a multi-sig. A permissioned proposer can also steal all user funds & censor. A centralized operator can exploit MEV & the centralized sequencer can censor, freeze & censor. If the AggLayerGateway is exploited, it would also allow all users' funds to be stolen instantly. A bug in the proof system could also lead to a loss of user funds. As well as a bug in the accounting proof system for the bridge. There is no exit window Scroll - Can steal all user funds instantly through a multi-sig, a centralized operator can exploit MEV & the centralized sequencer can censor. There is no exit window Abstract - Can steal all user funds instantly through a multi-sig, a centralized operator can exploit MEV & censor. The centralized sequencer can censor. Funds can also be lost if the proof system is implemented incorrectly. There is no exit window The facts speak for themselves; this is disgusting!

$SOL trades at just 1/5 the market cap of $ETH. Yet it’s 65x faster, generates 2.4x more revenue, and is 90x cheaper to use. Our bet? The faster horse.

Solana is digital silicon. We aren’t building a world computer. We are building a world supercluster.