GQ

8.6K posts

GQ banner
GQ

GQ

@GrahamGeek

I may be poor in fiat, but I'm also poor in eth. But wait...now that ordinals are a thing....I'm also poor in BTC. I suck at this.

USA شامل ہوئے Nisan 2009
1.6K فالونگ493 فالوورز
The Day Warrior
The Day Warrior@thedaywar90·
Democrat Mikie Sherrill just REFUSED to swear in as New Jersey Governor on the Bible… Instead, she chose a copy of the state constitution. Unreal.
The Day Warrior tweet media
English
4.4K
244
2.1K
1.2M
GQ
GQ@GrahamGeek·
@luxemiaa This generation of parents are worse than helicopter parents. And the result will be a generation of people unable to do a damned thing for themselves. And every last one of them will be in therapy
English
0
0
1
578
Mia♡
Mia♡@luxemiaa·
This woman shared on Instagram: My daughter is 13 now and has started to ask to go places with her friends. Am I doing too much by not allowing her to go unless I’m there? 😩 I hate to be the strict mom.
Mia♡ tweet media
English
1.9K
161
11.4K
12.5M
GQ
GQ@GrahamGeek·
@em_Lazzy She wouldn’t blow him.
English
0
0
0
8
Lazzyyyyyy
Lazzyyyyyy@em_Lazzy·
Why do you think Trump fired pam Bondi???
Lazzyyyyyy tweet media
English
382
10
124
643.1K
GQ
GQ@GrahamGeek·
@TGrammie2 Congratulations....you've figured out that property tax isn't sales tax. This generation is truly idiotic.
English
0
0
0
2
🌸 MT Nest 🌸
🌸 MT Nest 🌸@TGrammie2·
My house will be paid off in a few years, but I just calculated when my property tax and home insurance and I will still be paying nearly $500 a month for something I’ve already paid for
English
604
69
1.1K
60.9K
GQ
GQ@GrahamGeek·
@Nithya_Shrii How many people do you know retire at 55? That's the VAAAAST minority. Most are well into their 60's.
English
0
0
0
11
Nithya Shri
Nithya Shri@Nithya_Shrii·
Retirement at 55 has never made sense to me. People should be able to retire around 40-45 and still have enough life left to enjoy it.
English
540
72
1.3K
107.2K
GQ
GQ@GrahamGeek·
@alexgroberman Great.....now do the fucking military. That's where the majority of the money goes. and fuck you for your false equivolencies.
English
0
0
0
17
Alex Groberman
Alex Groberman@alexgroberman·
The Artemis program has cost $93 billion. Ending hunger in America would cost $32 billion a year. Making school lunch free for every American student would cost $11 billion a year. Replacing every lead pipe in the country would cost $45 billion. Covering uncompensated healthcare for every uninsured American would cost $42 billion a year. NASA just used that $93 billion to send four astronauts around the Moon. They are flying all the way there, looping around the far side, and coming home. Ten days. That is it. Here's the logic behind that $93 billion spend: Artemis I launched in 2022. No crew. No humans anywhere near it. Just the rocket and the spacecraft flying unmanned for 25 days to prove the systems worked. The heat shield. The navigation. The separation sequences. 161 test objectives completed. It proved the foundation was sound. Artemis II is the mission that launched today. Four astronauts. First humans beyond low Earth orbit since 1972. First woman beyond low Earth orbit. First person of color beyond low Earth orbit. They will fly around the far side of the Moon and return to Earth at nearly 25,000 miles per hour. The mission proves the spacecraft can keep humans alive in deep space. That is all it needs to prove. Artemis III is next. The crew will launch into Earth orbit and dock with the SpaceX Starship lander and the Blue Origin lander for the first time. They will test the vehicles that will eventually carry astronauts to the surface. Still no landing. Just proving the docking systems work. Artemis IV is the actual landing. First humans on the Moon since 1972. But it only works because three full missions built every piece of infrastructure underneath it. The rocket. The spacecraft. The life support. The landers. The docking systems. None of it skipped. Every mission compounding on the one before it. Four missions over six years before anyone touches the surface. $93 billion invested in the infrastructure underneath the moment everyone is waiting for. This is exactly what is happening across most marketing budgets right now. Most businesses run marketing like standalone missions. Launch a paid ad campaign: one flight, measure the results, mission over. Post on social media: one burst of reach, gone in 48 hours. Send an email blast: one open rate, done. Run a PR campaign: one news cycle, forgotten. Pay an influencer: one burst of attention, then silence. Every campaign is its own Artemis I, except there is no Artemis II. There is no infrastructure building underneath. Nothing carries forward to the next mission. You start from zero every quarter. (If you want to see where your site stands across Google and AI search, start here: seo-stuff.com/free-audit) SEO and AI search visibility is the only marketing channel that operates like a program instead of a campaign. You publish one authoritative page. That is Artemis I. It proves the foundation works. It ranks. It earns backlinks. It gets indexed. Then you publish the next one. That is Artemis II. And because the first page already built authority for your domain, the second one ranks faster. It earns trust quicker. It gets cited more often. Each piece of content builds infrastructure the next piece uses to go further. When ChatGPT cites a source, it evaluates the authority of the entire domain behind it. When Google's AI Overview pulls a reference, it selects based on the depth of everything connected to that page. When Perplexity assembles an answer, it pulls from the sources with the deepest, most authoritative body of content on the topic. These systems do not evaluate each page as a standalone mission. They evaluate the program behind it. No ad budget influences that selection. No social following determines it. No campaign calendar controls the outcome. The depth of what you have already built is what makes the next piece more powerful. That is how a program works. That is why it compounds. Paid ads are a standalone mission every time you launch them. SEO and AI search visibility is a program where every mission builds the infrastructure for the next one. That is the gap SEO Stuff was built to close. seo-stuff.com NASA could have tried to land on the Moon with the first crewed Artemis flight. It would have been faster. It would have been cheaper in the short term. And it probably would have failed, because the infrastructure underneath was not ready. Instead they built a program. Four missions. Six years. Each one proving something the next one needs. And today, more than 53 years after the last human left the Moon, four astronauts are on their way back because every piece of the foundation was already in place. The question is whether your marketing budget is running standalone missions that reset every quarter, or building a program where every piece of work makes the next one more powerful.
NASA@NASA

Liftoff. The Artemis II mission launched from @NASAKennedy at 6:35pm ET (2235 UTC), propelling four astronauts on a journey around the Moon. Artemis II will pave the way for future Moon landings, as well as the next giant leap — astronauts on Mars.

English
258
16
106
76K
GQ
GQ@GrahamGeek·
@KookCapitalLLC Why is this generation so fucking stupid. Evidence is no longer valid just because you say it isn't? We landed on the moon The earth is round Trump is a pedo
English
4
0
18
1.1K
kook 🏝️
kook 🏝️@KookCapitalLLC·
artemis is flying around the moon they arent even landing on the moon and we are supposed to believe they landed on the moon 100 years ago????? before we had color tvs and calculators???? and we could never do it again???? sure bro ya we landed on the moon 👍
English
292
81
1.7K
75.1K
GQ
GQ@GrahamGeek·
@Mikeggibbs Why is everyone on this app a fucking idiot?
English
0
0
0
3
GQ
GQ@GrahamGeek·
@Hoopss Give it!!!
GQ tweet media
English
0
0
0
2
Hoops
Hoops@Hoopss·
$100 to anyone who could do this
GIF
English
23.4K
1.2K
13.5K
3.2M
GQ
GQ@GrahamGeek·
@j_fishback That’s not how taxes work. If you don’t own a car you still gotta pay for the roads.
English
0
0
0
7
James Fishback
James Fishback@j_fishback·
If you decide to pull your child from public school and homeschool your child You should get the full $13,000 for your child that would have been spent on your child in public school
English
2.7K
4K
32.9K
1.9M
Jon Coker
Jon Coker@RicoSauve111·
@deaflibertarian Why are Nasa’s missions named after pagan gods? Project Mercury (1958–1963) Project Gemini (1961–1966) Apollo Program (1961–1972) Artemis Program (2017–ongoing) Could it be to show defiance toward God?
English
36
1
20
5.1K
David Hale
David Hale@desertd55·
They aren't. There are a lot of us conspiracy folks real old school ones that know we never went to the moon before. It was a movie production carried out by Stanley Kubrick. Space is fake. Earth is a flat motionless plane, and geocentric in nature, not heliocentric. Everything revolves around us. The stars moon, sun, other so called "planets" etc. This is perfect timing to redpill the world about flat earth.
English
122
2
51
10.3K
GQ
GQ@GrahamGeek·
@JustTheTweets17 Making fun of the disabled guy did t do it for you? Or the rape? Or ‘grab em by the pussy’? You had many chances. Fuck you.
English
0
0
0
20
anon
anon@anonchain·
Uhm why wouldn’t we just go in a straight line? 🤔
English
78
1
75
17.5K
Thom Bradley
Thom Bradley@ThomBradley8·
@ronsterd89 Only if both parents are US citizens. If one or both are not US citizens then the child should not be a US citizen either. The 14th amendment does not guarantee universe US citizenship to any Tom Dick and Harry or Jane Mary Sue from any country.
English
116
0
47
2.3K
Ron wright
Ron wright@ronsterd89·
VOTE: Should a child born on US soil automatically be a US citizen?
English
1.7K
32
502
41.8K
GQ
GQ@GrahamGeek·
@ronsterd89 Yes. The Constitution says so. Fuck off
English
0
0
0
9
GQ
GQ@GrahamGeek·
@rushicrypto One word. Money NASA has been significantly defunded since the 60s
English
0
0
0
1.2K
Rushi
Rushi@rushicrypto·
Serious question: If we were able to go to the Moon and land there in the 1960s, what makes it so difficult to do it again in 2026? Can’t we just reuse the technology from the 1960s and 1970s?
English
1.1K
87
3.9K
1.5M
James Seymour
James Seymour@seymo45794·
@rushicrypto Simple answer. We never went in the first place. It was staged. My next question is why this mission is not going to orbit the moon? Why aren’t we landing? Why is it going to take 2 more years to land? It is all BS. A distraction from this mess of earth.
English
15
0
10
3.6K