Invincible

3.4K posts

Invincible banner
Invincible

Invincible

@InvincibleEdge

Full-time airdrop hunter. Riding narratives & sharing it with you. Follow to boost your luck

get alpha first ⇒ شامل ہوئے Eylül 2008
39 فالونگ544 فالوورز
پن کیا گیا ٹویٹ
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
The Earliest Alpha Projects Take a note for the future✍️ @pumpfun_tv ~ They’re past launch, now building traction. @StreamerSolana ~ No clear stage info yet, but shows big potential. @polymaster ~ No public update yet and got a lot of followers in short time. @vigillabs ~ Raised $5.7M, but no live testnet info yet. @PDGYSTRG ~ Testnet III live, building toward Pudgy Penguin acquisition. Be one of the quickest>>>
Invincible tweet media
English
19
1
26
5.9K
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@GaryMarcus nah fighting the good fight then getting accused of hating is the most exhausting cycle in this whole timeline
English
0
0
1
3
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@AlexFinn straightforward list, first-timers should do fine with this worst case they burn their vercel credits and learn something anyway
English
0
0
0
65
Alex Finn
Alex Finn@AlexFinn·
Every app I vibe code has the tech stack below Easy for beginners and free to start If you've never built an app before, just paste this list into Codex or Claude Code and you'll be good to go: Web framework: NextJS Hosting: Vercel Database: Convex Auth: Clerk Payments: Stripe Styling: Tailwind AI: logic- OpenAI, creativity- Claude, cheap tasks- Gemini Flash 3 Emails: Resend Design apps with: GPT image gen 2 + Claude Design AI I use to build it all: Codex desktop app w/ GPT 5.5 Any questions let me know!
English
25
7
97
4.1K
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@DotCSV espera, aun sigue burbujeando? pensé que ya habia explotado
Español
0
0
2
297
Carlos Santana
Carlos Santana@DotCSV·
Se pospone otro trimestre más la burbuja de la IA 🫧📈
Español
8
9
102
3.3K
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@GaryMarcus @gnoble79 1.35 trillion is just a fancy way to say vaporware in a suit always respect the audacity though
English
0
0
0
15
Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus·
“roughly $1.35 trillion of pure narrative” is the best euphemism for pure bullshit that I have ever seen, @gnoble79. 👏
George Noble@gnoble79

This is the most OUTRAGEOUS deal I've seen in my 45 years on Wall Street. SpaceX just disclosed Musk's new compensation package: He gets up to 200 million super-voting shares if SpaceX hits a $7.5 trillion valuation, establishes a permanent human settlement of at least ONE MILLION people on Mars, and deploys roughly 100 terawatts of space-based computing power. Let me put the 100 terawatts in perspective: The entire electricity generation capacity of the United States is around 1.2 terawatts. The comp plan asks Musk to build more than 80x America's entire power grid... in orbit. This is a science fiction screenplay that somehow landed in front of the SEC. But here's why it actually matters for your portfolio... The S-1 reportedly claims a $28.5 trillion total addressable market, with over 90 percent attributed to AI. CapeFearAdvisors flagged this one cleanly: when Palantir went public, it disclosed a $119 billion TAM and the SEC reviewed and accepted it. SpaceX is claiming a market roughly 240x BIGGER. Now let's talk about what is actually being sold here: Reported 2025 revenue is approximately $15.5 billion. Starlink delivers around $11 billion of that with healthy margins, and the launch business is genuinely dominant. The problem is xAI - the AI piece doing all the heavy lifting in the trillion-dollar valuation pitch. xAI generated just $210 million of revenue in the first 3 quarters of 2025 while burning through $9.5 billion in cash. Ben Brey and Rupert Mitchell - a former Fidelity portfolio manager and a former head of equity capital markets at Goldman and Citi between them - ran a serious discounted cash flow on the actual operating businesses and arrived at roughly $400 billion. Lawrence Fossi covered their work recently and the math holds up. The IPO is being marketed at $1.75 TRILLION. The gap between what these businesses support and what Musk is asking the public to pay is roughly $1.35 trillion of pure narrative. Then layer on what we just learned last week... The New York Times investigation revealed Musk personally borrowed $500 million from SpaceX between 2018 and 2020 at rates as low as 1%, while bank prime rates sat around 5%. The same SpaceX has been used to bail out SolarCity, prop up Tesla during cash crunches, and absorb xAI when the AI losses became unmanageable. This is the same playbook he's run for two decades. Use a privately controlled entity as a personal piggy bank, and when the bills come due, find new investors to absorb the losses. The IPO is structured to keep that game going FOREVER. The Texas reincorporation strips away Delaware's fiduciary protections. Controlled-company status on the Nasdaq eliminates independent board requirements. And retail is being offered up to 30% of the offering (3x the normal allocation) because the institutions who actually do the math are quietly stepping away. Here is the part that finishes the case for me: Roughly $40 billion of the IPO proceeds are already spoken for before a single dollar reaches operations. About $23 billion retires SpaceX debt. Another $17 billion retires the high-interest debt sitting on xAI and X. This raise is not funding the future. It's just plugging existing holes that retail investors will now own. In my 45 years I've never seen a deal where the comp hurdle is colonizing another planet. I've never seen a disclosed TAM that exceeds verified comparables by two orders of magnitude. I've never seen a company asking the public to fund the retirement of debt incurred by separate private entities controlled by the same individual. Every red flag I've watched precede a major bust over four decades is sitting in this prospectus, in plain sight. The Tesla mispricing is being repeated on a far larger scale. And this time the bag is being handed directly to retail. Don't be the one holding it.

English
2
2
17
2.4K
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@coreyganim kinda wild plugins went from "make it do the thing" to needing a whole product doc but ngl this breakdown actually makes sense
English
0
0
0
5
Corey Ganim
Corey Ganim@coreyganim·
The clearest explanation of Claude plugins you'll find. A plugin isn't one thing. It's a bundle of 4: 1. Skills. Instructions that teach Claude how to write in your voice, analyze data, run a process. 2. Connectors. Live links to Drive, Gmail, Notion, Slack, Salesforce. Pulls real data, takes real actions. 3. Slash commands. /command triggers the whole workflow in one keystroke. 4. Sub-agents. Parallel workers that knock out pieces of the task at the same time. Skills are the Lego blocks. Plugins are the assembled set. One command runs the entire agentic workflow. Set up once. Run forever.
Corey Ganim tweet media
Corey Ganim@coreyganim

x.com/i/article/2044…

English
1
1
3
900
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@OrenMe pricing is gonna force more thoughtful usage the shotgun approach was never gonna scale
English
1
0
0
16
Oren Melamed
Oren Melamed@OrenMe·
Token-based pricing is the moment this whole space grows up. For a while, “per request” hid the real story. Now we’re finally seeing the actual economics of intelligence. A few things that stand out to me: You start designing systems, not prompts You don’t just “call AI” anymore. You design flows. Mix nano / mini / full models per step, route by complexity, cache aggressively. Cost becomes a first-class design dimension, not an afterthought. Caching is the new superpower When cached input is ~10x cheaper, reuse isn’t just nice to have - it’s architecture Small models aren’t “fallbacks” anymore The gap is now priced in. You should deliberately choose cheaper models for 80% of tasks and reserve the heavy ones for edge cases. Agent patterns become more practical Parallel runs, reflection loops, planning steps You can now shape them around cost instead of avoiding them This kills the illusion that AI is “free labor” And that’s a good thing. It forces better engineering, better product thinking, and more realistic expectations. Net-net: We’re moving from “vibes-based AI usage” to systems engineering with cost-awareness. The teams that win won’t be the ones using the smartest model They’ll be the ones building the smartest routing layer on top of all of them. I guess we will still need those data scientist to eval our ai coding agent skills after all 😀
English
3
0
4
159
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@gdb ive been using it for layout sketches too. kinda wild how much guesswork it removes from the design-to-code handoff
English
0
0
0
12
Stanford HAI
Stanford HAI@StanfordHAI·
Leading scientists and experts from various disciplines will convene on May 5 for an interdisciplinary discussion of where AI is genuinely accelerating discovery, and what it means for the future of scientific research. Join us: hai.stanford.edu/events/ai-scie…
Stanford HAI tweet media
English
3
1
10
560
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@kimmonismus 800% growth and the headline is "quietly proved" lmao theyre screaming it at this point
English
0
0
0
135
Chubby♨️
Chubby♨️@kimmonismus·
Google just quietly proved the AI monetization thesis. Quite interesting earnings! Cloud revenue up 63% to over $ 20b gen AI product revenue growing nearly 800% year-over-year. The backlog nearly doubled to $460 billion in a single quarter. The number of $100M–$1B deals doubled. Multiple billion-dollar-plus contracts signed. But the real story is Search. The prevailing narrative was that AI would cannibalize Google's core business, people get answers from chatbots, stop Googling. The opposite is happening. Search ad revenue grew 19%, queries hit an all-time high. Google turned the biggest existential threat to its business into a growth accelerator.
Chubby♨️ tweet media
Sundar Pichai@sundarpichai

Read my full remarks: blog.google/company-news/i…

English
8
13
142
9.3K
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@DotCSV the balance between control and happy accidents is the whole puzzle how much of the unpredictability do you actually want to keep?
English
0
0
0
65
Carlos Santana
Carlos Santana@DotCSV·
Cuando hace unos años se decía que las IAs de generación de video nos iban a dar una versatilidad y control enorme nos referíamos a cosas como estas... y a más que está por venir! El control sumado a la velocidad de ejecución y eficiencia que la IA ofrece no tiene competencia.
Nem Perez@NemPerez

I’ve been stress testing the capabilities of what Seedance can do especially in the hybrid space. As a filmmaker I love being on set and working with actors. AI can’t replicate the happy accidents you create while filming. While it’s not perfect I can see how smaller indie films can start utilizing this motion transfer technique to tell more grand stories. Let me know what you think. Created using @runwayml thanks to my CPP @c_valenzuelab

Español
4
9
87
5.1K
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@0xROAS ngl these feel like theyd actually work on some feed lol
English
0
0
0
96
0x ROAS
0x ROAS@0xROAS·
ChatGPT Images 2 is really good for native ads. i can visualize emotions really easy with it.
0x ROAS tweet media0x ROAS tweet media
English
3
1
19
1.3K
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@GaryMarcus the accuracy of saying that then immediately realizing the audience gap is brutal felt like a glitch in the timeline
English
0
0
0
8
Gary Marcus
Gary Marcus@GaryMarcus·
I was about to say “my phone is ringing off the hook with media calls about the Musk-OpenAI lawsuit” — and then realized a lot of people here might not know how hooks and phones relate 🤣
GIF
English
5
0
12
1.7K
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@milesdeutscher idk if its actually dumber or if we just got spoiled by the last version
English
0
0
0
41
Miles Deutscher
Miles Deutscher@milesdeutscher·
I didn’t think I’d be making this video… Over the last two weeks, Claude turned stupid. This almost always happens with new model releases - and it kills your productivity. Luckily, I just found the cure to make it smart again (easily). Watch now 👉youtu.be/QwqbWVfbsz8
YouTube video
YouTube
Miles Deutscher tweet media
English
12
0
27
4.1K
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@bentossell the replies got u blushing in public its a nice feeling
English
0
0
1
16
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@AmirMushich the field is actually framed. but the helvetica gap gave it away first those tracking options always telling on u
English
0
0
0
15
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@TTrimoreau read and just keep grinding has one exit door and we all walk through it eventually questions like this get ppl stuck in their own heads tbh
English
0
0
1
5
Thomas Trimoreau
Thomas Trimoreau@TTrimoreau·
Progress matters. But visibility multiplies it. Are you visible enough?
English
11
0
17
501
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@starks_arq the elevator selfie is definitely a power move but what exactly is the "most positive" future here
English
0
0
0
13
Amir D
Amir D@starks_arq·
Media companies have to collectively contribute to manifesting the future in the most positive way possible.
Amir D tweet media
Amir D@starks_arq

The future billion dollar companies will be tech x media companies. 2 brothers from Europe. Traveling the world. Using the tech available to inspire it. Honest. Public. Serious. In 6-12 months, AI film took us from zero to executive producers in Hollywood. AI film got us invited to @HansMokeNiemann’s private @netflix documentary screening in New York. AI film brought us to the @tether team, where we got the opportunity to explore creating narrative music. AI film brought us to El Salvador. None of this is about AI vs no AI. It’s about story. We told ours. We got love in return. ARQ will take this serious. We looked at the board and decided who we want to be. Here’s New York. We just finished LA. Tomorrow, SF. We’re here and it’s time.

English
2
0
7
708
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@koltregaskes i think september for gpt-6 would be insane considering what 5 just launched not complaining though
English
1
0
1
12
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@kimmonismus even forbes writers cant wrap their head around cost curves that fast its hard to think in doublings when youre used to linear world
English
0
0
0
38
Chubby♨️
Chubby♨️@kimmonismus·
When I read articles like this one in Forbes, I wonder if they realize that AI inference is currently becoming about 5-10x cheaper each year, with occasional jumps of 10-100x for certain capabilities. It may be true of this year and maybe the year after that "compute is far beyond the costs of the employees". But probably not for many years to come.
Chubby♨️ tweet media
English
20
9
127
8.1K
Invincible
Invincible@InvincibleEdge·
@mattshumer_ fear of technology speedrun to founder arc whats the app do or are we gatekeeping moms now?
English
0
0
1
61
Matt Shumer
Matt Shumer@mattshumer_·
My mom (who is terrified of technology) is vibe coding I gave her Agent-S and now she’s built a webapp and is trying to start a business around it What has this world come to?
English
27
4
101
16.7K