John in Exile

@JoelWBerry You know it’s bad when even Wolfe is saying don’t associate with the term ‘Christian’ Nationalist in public 😂😂

Hi Brian. Allow me to interrupt your slam poetry and explain this to you. We want to defeat the Left. Nazis (like you and Eric Conn, let’s be honest here) are cancer. The Right can’t win if it dies of cancer. Let me know if I can further clarify.

@allenanalysis 😂😂😂 nypost.com/2026/06/17/spo…

The Knicks declined the White House invitation. New York being New York. 🧡💙

@elimcgowan @Gojo1471498 😂😂😂

@JohnnyBtst @Gojo1471498 My wife told me not to tweet that the other day, because they would, and I told her that was the point lol

I listened to Eric Conn and Brian Sauve explaining how a Nazi publishing house ended up at the "War for Normal" conference hosted by their publishing house, New Christendom. I don't personally feel at all relieved by their explaination, in fact I think they did more to highlight why so many Reformed Christians are alarmed by the spread of certain strains of Christian Nationalism. Let me try to explain why. First, I have been going to Reformed Christian conferences of varying sizes for 33 years, and I have never been to one that was selling pro-Third Reich, Pro-Nazi books. In fact, at every one I've been to, had someone set up the same table that was at the "War for Normal" conference, people would have been appalled, and the organizers would have booted them in less than an hour. In this case though, the table was up throughout the conference and only became controversial AFTER the event finished. As for the ridiculous "inadequately vetted" idea, no deep dive was necessary; all you had to do was visit the Antelope Hill website. The top page is literally full of works by men like Josef Goebbels and Adolf Hitler. You can't be anywhere on the site without realizing it's clearly pro-Third Reich. Second, at no point in their discussion did they repudiate the actual Nazi stuff, which promotes the entire Aryan, Master Race, Nuremberg laws, liquidation of the Jews and "useless eaters", twisting of Christianity, slavery of the subhumans, agenda. They called those "varying political works" and encouraged people to read them for themselves. The only thing that they admitted to being upset about was the "Pro-White Businesses" card given away with the books that sent people to businesses selling tarot cards, porn, and a Nordic cult. They didn't even mention the Nazi jewellery site. They made it clear they don't have any problem with selling actual Nazi propaganda. Brian Sauve speaking of Antelope Hill, actually said, “I don’t have a problem with them” and mentioned he owned and was looking forward to reading one of their premier, 'It's all a Jewish conspiracy' books. Third, they used the podcast to call people's concerns about Nazi propaganda at a Christian family conference, "Faux outrage" drummed up by "marionette people." Sauve had this message for those on Twitter who are posting about this (which I assume would include people like me): “I have no respect for you as a person. I think you’re bad people and you are actively doing harm against the church, and you should repent or you will go to hell.” I'm not sure what part of being concerned about Nazi material being sold at a Christian conference is "actively doing harm against the church"? but I'll move on... Fourthly, they actually spent time peddling some of the outright lies that are becoming part and parcel of the "anti-PWC" community. I'll just give you one: they claimed that Churchill was the one who initiated incendiary raids on civilian targets, when in fact the Nazis had bombed plenty of civilian targets in Spain during the Spanish Civil War (Guernica, for instance), and had already bombed Wieluń, Warsaw, and the city center of Rotterdam with incendiaries, killing thousands of civilians. The Dutch actually surrendered BECAUSE they were afraid their cities would be wiped out one by one. At the time, the British were still conducting pointless leaflet raids and fruitless attacks on military targets. All in all, this was not an apology nor even an excuse. Yes, they are clearly embarrassed that Nordic pagan/occultic material that was part and parcel of the Third Reich was promoted at their conference, but they are certainly not embarrassed and will not apologize that books glorifying the Third Reich, Nazi leaders, Nazism, and the twisted Christianity of the Reich were being sold and read. More alarmingly, subsequent comments seem to indicate that very few of the people who attended the conference were concerned either. In fact, a lot of the attendees seem to want a lot more of this material (something Sauve actually alluded to). Prior to 2020 if you'd told me that an American version of the "Positive Christianity" of the Third Reich (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_… ) would have a following among people calling themselves Reformed, I wouldn't have believed it, but today, I'll admit, it's happening.

@Gojo1471498 @elimcgowan Try reading that one again, gojo1471498 😂😂

@JohnnyBtst @elimcgowan You a big supporter of pronazi merchandise? Racist!

@Gojo1471498 @elimcgowan the gossips are screenshoting you now.

@JohnnyBtst @PastorAndyWebb @ChristOverChaos

@ChristOverChaos I’ll pray for you, Ryan.

@JohnnyBtst Lol baldy? That's the best you got? Sounds like you're a manlet and physical weakling.

@HwsEleutheroi I pray for you often, James.

@ChristOverChaos Coming from you baldy, that’s a compliment 😂

@JohnnyBtst @Eric_Conn @HwsEleutheroi You're a weirdo

@HonestYPTweets Oh man…now you’re going to really feel the love from the trolls 😂 PS - Nice meme, 💯 accurate!

@PastorAndyWebb @ChristOverChaos It’s supposed to be a big gotcha! Lindsay was at G3 so they are going to shriek that this somehow nullifies any criticism of pro-nazi merchandise being sold at ‘war for normal’ - of course the two are not at all alike, but most of these folks are too stupid or disingenuous 😉

@ChristOverChaos Ok, I'll bite, why is my critique of the response of a church in Utah to the revelation that they had Nazi books for sale at their Christian conference nullified by the fact that I haven't interacted on X with an agnostic political commentator?

@Jerd00 You got me ma’am! Your butchered Acts 17:26 quote has caught me totally off guard! So when are you going to make the case for re-establishing 80-90 AD borders?

@JohnnyBtst @dalepartridge @ostrachan What a 200iq comparison you have there. It’s as if God *didnt* design the nations and their borders and their people and you’re the only one who could see those are actually not his design.

Just FYI: we will not mainstream Hitlerism in the evangelical church. We will not embrace kinism. We will not normalize paganism. We did not wage war against wokeness to bow at the feet of ethnonationalism. We will destroy the stronghold of kinism by the power of the gospel.

@MichaelStP4359 Sorry you can’t follow the argument! Show me where i said if something exists post fall it’s sinful and I’ll concede. The irony is you intially bought up sin being ‘post fall’ as some big proof of sin being a non-sequitur 😭😭 But I agree, this one seems over your head 😉 ✌️

@JohnnyBtst What a stupid argument 😂 So if something exists post fall its sinful.. The very existence of the church is sinful. Trees are sinful. Everything is sinful. We can be done here, you’re not very bright.

@MichaelStP4359 Sin is ‘post fall human nature obviously’ So were ethnostates pre fall? 😂😂

@JohnnyBtst Sin is post-fall human nature obviously. Anyways back to the topic at hand, ethnostates aren’t sinful since God Himself instituted them. Tf are you even saying at this point 😂

@MichaelStP4359 The real non-sequitur in this discussion is brinnging up statistics to determine ‘God’s design’

@MichaelStP4359 Saying sin is a non-sequitur does not make it so. The purpose of pointing out ethnostates is to show it’s a global normative organization in line with scripture. The purpose of pointing out sin is to show it’s a global normative behavior in line with scripture.

@MichaelStP4359 Thought you said 💯- disappointing to see you backtrack man! This is the formulation you’d agree with then? 70% of all nations are ethnostates. This is a *partial proof* of God’s design for nations 100% of all people sin. This is a *partial proof* of God’s design for people.

@JohnnyBtst It’s not peak retardation, statistics are a partial proof of racial distinction and separation via natural revelation. And I don’t know exactly when God separated every race on earth, there’s competing theories but we know when He separated the sons of Noah (Gen. 10).

@MichaelStP4359 👏👏 Tremendous Mikey. I’m glad you are granting my point that throwing out a statistic and saying ‘God designed it’ is peak retardation and have now moved the goal posts. Happy to help you out with your new line of argumentation! Where did God first segregate Nations? 🧐🧐

@JohnnyBtst @dalepartridge @ostrachan 💯 Johnny Good job it was God Himself who segregated the nations and races to begin with 😉 👉🏻divided the races proper for millennia via thousands of miles of deserts and oceans 👉🏻commands ethnocentrism of Israel 👉🏻Acts 17:26 Maybe you should be finger wagging Him instead.

@MichaelStP4359 @dalepartridge @ostrachan 💯 Mikey Should never make such a retarded argument that just because something is statistically prevalent that it is ‘God’s design’, right?

@JohnnyBtst @dalepartridge @ostrachan God designed sin? Blasphemous take.

@NeilShenvi @not_our_guy I have it on good authority that Brian and Eric are super well versed in WW2 history from Antelope Hill guy. They were even attempting to educate everyone else by offering books at a recent conference I’m told.

I'd love to watch a public dialogue between @Brian_Sauve, @Eric_Conn , and @not_our_guy where they discuss all the factual claims made in Ogden's 1=hour response video.

@dalepartridge @ostrachan LOL. “70% of all nations are ethnostates. This is God’s design for nations.” 100% of all people sin. This is God’s design for people.

To conflate Hitlerism with ethnonationalism is wild. 70% of all nations are ethnostates. This is God’s design for nations. It doesn’t mean you can’t have some immigration but to push for multi ethnic nations is out of step with all church history and right in step with liberalism.