پن کیا گیا ٹویٹ
MEEcom
970 posts

MEEcom
@MEEcom44
Ecommerce & paid growth UGC systems • AI leverage Turning attention into revenue
شامل ہوئے Aralık 2025
380 فالونگ51 فالوورز

@blvckledge Exactly, and the disconnect is usually headline-level. Ad hooks on price or pain point, page opens with brand story. You lost them in the first 3 seconds.
English

@DTC_Quizbuilder The operators building infrastructure right now are going to own the next 5 years. Early is always uncomfortable.
English

Super interesting
Guys from all corners of X scaling like absolute mad men
Never been so bullish 🔥
Chad Keller@ChadwKeller
1. This is still a struggle tbh just because we are so new it create cash flow issues. We are handling the best we can but I’d be lying if I didn’t say we are still learning. We ran through a period of shipping issues which caused a bunch of negative reviews but scaled the cs team to 55 agents in 3 weeks to combat it. 2. My partner dominated this. Traveling back and forth to china constantly in the first 9 months. 3. I built marketerhire.com so I’ve always had a network of great people I was finally able to put to work.
English

@MEEcom44 yeah payout holds around holidays are brutal… did Shopify give you any notice or did it just suddenly freeze?
English

@yojimmykim @CommerceRound @TaylorHoliday @CommnThreadCo @ecomchasedimond Rooms where 80% of attendees are past the $5M mark hit differently. No beginner questions, just real operator talk.
English

75% OF THE ROOM IS TRAVELING
From as far as Australia, South America, Europe and Asia..
This may be the strongest and most diverse room we've ever created for @CommerceRound Austin!
80% of the room is brands doing OVER $5m a year... with 20% of those doing over $50m a year..
And it's 60% founders, 25% VP's and Executives, and the rest are marketers and operations.
We are just 9 days away from Commerce Roundtable Austin.
2 full days of 350 of the best DTC and eCommerce Founders, Executives, Operators, Marketers, Agencies, and SaaS providers learning, connecting, and growing.
When you're surrounded by people who are doing the work, the conversations are just different.
You leave with things you can actually use, not stuff you have to translate into something applicable first.
Our goal: We’re going to deliver the best Austin event you’ve been to
• 18+ keynote speakers
• Beautiful venue in the heart of Austin
• Intentional networking spaces
• Premium Austin-inspired breakfast and lunch
• Sunset happy hour with open bar (+ @drinkbrez for the vibes)
• Over 13+ confirmed afterparty experiences to attend.
And of course: $220,000 in on-stage giveaways!
All led by @iamshackelford the best MC in the game.
We're over 93% sold out now and once we hit capacity, the venue simply cannot fit anymore people so we'll have to shut doors.
Don't have FOMO.. Tickets are still available.
Get yours today.

English

Ran the same ecom content pipeline through LangGraph and Claude Code subprocess agents.
LangGraph: clean graph definition, fell apart when rate limits hit mid-run.
Claude Code: messier to orchestrate, but 90 days, zero failures.
Production reliability beats developer experience. Every single time.
English

$2.5M/mo ceiling. 70 coaches, $25K/day in ads.
That's not a bad business. It's just not scalable. You're still selling time, AI just makes it cheaper.
Kajabi hit $100M+ ARR. Skool, Whop, same path. All started as services and got tired of the ceiling.
Services teach you what to build. Then you build the infrastructure under yourself.
Who's making that jump right now?
English

LangGraph vs a 200-line Python scheduler calling `claude -p`.
LangGraph: elegant state graphs, retry logic, graph visualization.
Simple orchestrator: one file, 30 agents on a schedule, each with its own prompt file.
Built the simple one over a weekend. LangGraph is still sitting in a branch.
English

@TheecomMike That flat repeat AOV is almost always a product discovery problem. Returning customers have higher intent but get shown the same homepage as strangers.
English

i rebuilt a post purchase flow last october.
repeat AOV went from $79 to $118 in 10 weeks.
same store. same customers. same products.
here's what i found when i audited it:
first order AOV: $76. repeat order AOV: $79.
almost identical. that gap told me everything.
customers coming back were buying the same thing they bought the first time. nobody was moving up to bundles.
nobody was buying the higher ticket products. nobody was being shown what to buy next.
then i looked at the post purchase flow.
thank you email with a discount code. shipping update. review request at day 14.
the discount code in the thank you email was actually making it worse.
it was training repeat customers to expect a discount before they'd buy again.
compressing margins on the customers with the highest LTV potential.
and still not moving anyone toward higher ticket products because the email had zero product direction.
so i rebuilt the whole sequence.
removed the blanket discount from the thank you email entirely.
built a 4 email sequence that educated customers on the full product line based on what they bought first.
made specific product recommendations timed to when cohort data showed customers were actually ready to buy again.
moved discounts to the winback sequence only for customers who hadn't purchased in 75 days.
repeat AOV went from $79 to $118 in 10 weeks.
a blanket discount in your thank you email isn't a retention strategy.
it's margin compression dressed up as one.
English

@TheecomMike That gap is the tell. When repeat AOV matches first-order AOV, the post-purchase sequence is doing nothing but confirming the sale. What did you change first, the timing or the offer?
English

@anKit0017_ @trikcode The code is just infrastructure. The real bottleneck is whether the human running the AI knows what output they're actually trying to get.
English


