Luis Marcano 🦉 BITCOIN ONLY👨‍💻RDTS (BIP-110)

If you're a Bitcoin noderunner you're much more powerful and sovereign than you probably realize. There is actually very little global hashrate, and it's very cheap to control it with your node. Yesterday at the @bcc8333 conference I brought a @start9labs node that remotely controlled 100 Ph/s for about half an hour of workshop. That is about 1/10.000 of the total hashrate. These shares haven't dropped of @ocean_mining's reward window yet, and since then 6 blocks have been found by the pool. If two more blocks are found before the shares drop off the window my demo will have been basically free.

🚨 Real example of what we’ll start seeing the moment RDTS (BIP-110) activates in August 📷🔥 My Knots node right now (still pre-activation): 📷 1 clean active chain → blocks that will comply with BIP-110 ❌Multiple “valid-fork”, “valid-headers”, “headers-only” → exactly the junk/spam blocks most miners are producing today When the soft fork hits (~block 961k), honest nodes will instantly reject the spam majority and keep ONLY the clean compliant chain.This isn’t a split. This is Bitcoin rejecting cancer on sight.#BitcoinOnly #BIP110 #RDTS #Knots

@blockamoto Let’s be crystal clear: you and the Bitmap crowd aren’t neutral cypherpunks defending “what’s possible.” You’re active participants in turning Bitcoin from sovereign sound money into a subsidized spam ledger for speculative JPEG casinos and virtual land grifts. You promote inscribing block heights to “claim” them as metaverse property. That sounds cute until you look at the real costs: • Your inscriptions compete directly with real monetary transfers. Legitimate users sending actual BTC sit in the mempool for weeks while low-value data dumps fill blocks because they pay enough fees to miners chasing short-term profit. This distorts the fee market and degrades Bitcoin’s primary use-case: peer-to-peer electronic cash. • You externalize the costs. Node operators and full verifiers (the backbone of decentralization) bear higher bandwidth, storage, and UTXO bloat. You privatize the hype and flip profits. Classic tragedy of the commons. Bitcoin’s security and decentralization rely on low barriers to running nodes—not becoming a decentralized Dropbox for your “persistent data” experiments. • “Uncensorable persistent data” is not a killer use-case here. It’s a side-effect that becomes cancerous when it crowds out money. Satoshi designed Bitcoin as sound money with a fixed supply, not an infinite data tomb. The whitepaper doesn’t mention metaverses or block-reclaiming schemes. Your “use-case” dilutes the monetary premium that gives Bitcoin its value in the first place. Calling people who want to defend the protocol “wishful thinkers” is cope. Bitcoin evolves through consensus and social coordination—not by letting every grift run wild because “it’s possible.” We already filter invalid txs. Extending rational policy against clear non-monetary spam (via Knots defaults, DATUM sovereign templates, and proposals like BIP-110) is responsible stewardship, not censorship. That’s why people like you feel genuine terror at a UASF with real support (>10% nodes signaling, growing hashrate via sovereign miners). Because when plebs run their own nodes, build their own block templates, and reject your parasites, the party ends. No more free-riding on Bitcoin’s security and decentralization while pumping your speculative ecosystem at everyone else’s expense. You’re not building on Bitcoin. You’re building on top of its weaknesses for personal gain. That’s not innovation—it’s a cancer. It attracts the exact kind of short-term degen behavior that erodes long-term credibility and adoption as money. Bitcoin doesn’t need your virtual land. It needs to stay hard, scarce, and focused on monetary sovereignty. Run your Knots node, mine sovereign with DATUM, filter the trash, and support BIP-110. The network is healing. Your genie is going back in the bottle. #BitcoinOnly #BIP110 #SoundMoney