ML🇪🇺🇫🇷

@FinanceLancelot Well, it’s time to read again Steinbeck and his masterpiece « Grapes of wrath » if the MAGAs read it, but I doubt ... The future is going to be very bleak for this so-called Golden Age, leading the world to its doom once again #TrumpWarCriminal #StopwarOnİran

Ben voilà… on y est 🌋💥

#Trump : lack of empathy, absence of solidarity, unwillingness to cooperate in helping others, disregard for the well-being of others, utterly detached, emotionally and humanly, utterly incapable of feeling, your problem is not his problem. He cares about himself and no one else.

Le choc des cultures 😂😂

@LouisHausalter C’est clair que ce débat sur le travail devrait être le cœur de la campagne 2027 avec en corollaire la réforme des retraites !

"Il fallait quinze années de travail dans l’après-guerre pour doubler son niveau de vie, il en faut désormais quatre-vingt-dix, soit l’équivalent de deux carrières pleines." lepoint.fr/debats/pourquo…

@FredGaulois Franchement quel gâchis ! Alors que la Chine est aussi positionnée sur l’hydrogène depuis plus de 20 ans (voir tous les brevets déposés). Nous on a dépensé des millions en veille et recherche (cf réseau Ademe/CEA PACO, Panach etc), mais incapable de créer des industries 🤬😞

La société Pragma industrie vient d'être placée en liquidation judiciaire. C'est un sacré gâchis, ils avaient conçu ce vélo électrique qui fonctionne à l'hydrogène. Temps de charge : 30 secondes. Autonomie : 100 km. Coût de la charge : 1 €. Produit en grande quantité, les prix auraient pu être abordables, c'est dingue que la 🇫🇷 ne puisse pas aider ce genre de produit plutôt des batteries chinoises!!!

#NumericFiction Et ce n’est pas une blague 😳

Populisme : faire peur aux Français. Le coût pour le contribuable européen est ZÉRO. 1. Les 18 milliards d'euros correspondent à la part européenne — les pays du G7 se sont engagés à soutenir l'Ukraine pour une somme de 50 milliards d'euros. 2. Les 18 milliards sont garantis par le gel des fonds de la Banque centrale russe qu'elle possèdait en Europe. Euroclear, institution financière basée à Bruxelles, gère ces fonds russes d'un montant de 190 milliards d'euros : les intérêts générés par leurs placements financent le prêt de 18 milliards. 3. Défendre l'Ukraine c'est protéger l'Europe donc les Français.

@larroumecj Si vous ne le connaissez pas déjà, je vous invite à parcourir ce travail d’Intelligence Économique édifiant de l’EGE ! 🫤 ege.fr/sites/ege.fr/f…

As tensions between Europe and the United States grow sharper, the old rhetoric according to which America generously saved Western Europe out of pure benevolence is being wheeled out again by Americans. It needs to be understood clearly: THIS IS A COMPLETE FABRICATION. Entry was forced, not chosen •Neutrality maintained from September 1939 through December 1941, despite the fall of Poland, the fall of France, the Battle of Britain and the onset of the Shoah. •The US entered only after Pearl Harbor (7 December 1941) and Hitler’s declaration of war on the US (11 December 1941). No American initiative. •House vote to extend the draft on 12 August 1941: 203 to 202. One vote. •Gallup polling 1939 to 1941: a consistent majority opposed entering the war. The America First Committee reached around 800,000 members. Britain paid cash before getting aid •“Cash and Carry” (November 1939) required belligerents to pay in gold or dollars and to ship in their own bottoms. •“Destroyers for Bases” deal (2 September 1940): 50 obsolete WWI destroyers in exchange for 99-year leases on eight British bases (Newfoundland, Bermuda, Caribbean). •Britain was forced to liquidate US-held assets (American Viscose sold to a Morgan Stanley syndicate in March 1941) before Lend-Lease was enacted. •Lend-Lease Article VII (Master Agreement, 23 February 1942): British commitment to dismantle Imperial Preference as a condition of aid. War aims: dismantling the British Empire and seizing its succession •Atlantic Charter (14 August 1941): Roosevelt inserted self-determination and equal access to raw materials, directly targeting the Ottawa Preference system of 1932. •Bretton Woods (July 1944): the dollar became the reserve currency, Keynes’s “bancor” plan was rejected, sterling was subordinated. •Council on Foreign Relations War and Peace Studies (1939 to 1945, Rockefeller-funded): explicit planning for US succession to British hegemony. Roosevelt betrayed France repeatedly •Treaty of Guarantee signed by Wilson, Clemenceau and Lloyd George on 28 June 1919. France surrendered the Rhine frontier in exchange. The US Senate refused to ratify (Versailles rejected on 19 November 1919 and again on 19 March 1920). The British guarantee, tied to US ratification, lapsed automatically. France had traded the Rhine for nothing. •June 1940: Reynaud’s telegrams of 14, 15, 18 June begged Roosevelt for intervention or at least a public commitment. Roosevelt’s 13 June reply offered material aid and explicitly refused military commitment. He forbade publication. •The US maintained full diplomatic recognition of Vichy until November 1942 (Admiral Leahy as ambassador to Pétain). •Operation Torch (November 1942): a deal with Darlan, the Vichy collaborationist, then with Giraud, deliberately excluding de Gaulle. •Casablanca / Anfa conference (January 1943): Roosevelt tried to impose Giraud, a docile military figure, over de Gaulle. •Roosevelt’s “Wallonia” project: in 1942 and 1943 the President proposed to Anthony Eden and to Lord Chandos the creation of a new buffer state, “Wallonia”, carved out by detaching Alsace-Lorraine and parts of northern France from French territory and merging them with French-speaking Belgium and Luxembourg. France, the country that had been invaded, was to be amputated by its own ally. The plan was dropped only because of British opposition and de Gaulle’s establishment of facts on the ground. •AMGOT plan: a US military government envisaged for liberated France, with its own occupation currency printed in advance. A pure denial of French sovereignty. •Recognition of the GPRF withheld until 23 October 1944, more than four months after D-Day, while the GPRF was already administering liberated France. •France excluded from Yalta (February 1945). The French occupation zone in Germany was carved out of British and American zones at Churchill’s insistence, against Roosevelt’s preference. Strategic priorities served US interests, not liberation •“Germany First” (ABC-1 plan, March 1941) was set before Pearl Harbor to protect the Atlantic and the hemispheric position, not to rescue Europeans. •The second front was delayed from 1942 to 1944 despite Soviet demands, in favor of Mediterranean operations covering imperial sea lanes. •Quincy Pact (14 February 1945, USS Quincy): the Roosevelt and Ibn Saud agreement secured Saudi oil before the war was even over. Continued business with the Reich •Ford-Werke, Opel (a GM subsidiary), IBM via Dehomag, ITT via Focke-Wulf: American-owned industrial assets operated inside Nazi Germany throughout the war. •Standard Oil of New Jersey and IG Farben agreements on synthetic rubber and aviation additives are documented into 1941 and 1942. •Union Banking Corporation (Prescott Bush) was seized under the Trading with the Enemy Act only in October 1942. Indifference to the persecuted •Évian Conference (July 1938): the US refused to raise immigration quotas for Jewish refugees. •SS St. Louis (June 1939): 900 Jewish refugees were turned away from US shores. •The rail lines to Auschwitz were not bombed in 1944 despite War Refugee Board requests and the available range of bombers based in Italy. American soldiers were not ideological crusaders •Around 16 million Americans were mobilised, of whom about 10 million were conscripted under the Selective Training and Service Act (September 1940), the first peacetime draft in US history. •Samuel Stouffer, The American Soldier (1949, around 500,000 surveys): the primary combat motivation was small-unit loyalty and wanting to go home. Abstract ideological motives (“Four Freedoms”, the defeat of fascism) ranked low. •The extermination of the Jews was not publicly known at the scale we now understand until the camp liberations of spring 1945. “The war to save the Jews” is a post-1960 retrospective construction. •GI Bill (June 1944): around 8 million beneficiaries. This was the real domestic payoff, a middle-class expansion program, not a liberation crusade. Postwar result: American primacy, not European freedom •US GDP rose from around 27 percent of world output in 1941 to around 50 percent in 1945. The only major economy enriched by the war. •Marshall Plan (1948) conditioned on market opening, the exclusion of Communist parties from government, and purchases of US goods. •NATO (1949) under permanent American command (SACEUR). US bases installed in Europe to the present day. •The empires of the allies (British, French, Dutch) were dismantled within twenty years. The US emerged as the sole Western hegemon. Conclusion None of this is a moral indictment. It is, in truth, perfectly normal. In the long history of nations, it is exceedingly rare for a country to send its children to die out of altruism. States send their sons to fight to defend their interests. That is the rule, not the exception. The Americans behaved as any serious power behaves. The fault lies partly with us, for having believed otherwise. But it lies also with the Americans of today, who sincerely believe their own propaganda, who have ended up taking the Hollywood version of their own history at face value, and who now lecture us from the height of a fable. We would like, finally, to talk to them as adults talk to adults, between people who understand the real nature of things. We were fortunate that, for a moment in history, American interests partly coincided with our own. That coincidence was real, but only partial. It meant the defeat of Germany and the holding at bay of Soviet Russia, both of which served us. It also meant the deliberate weakening of Britain and France, the dismantling of their empires, and the subordination of their currencies and industries, none of which served us. The same hand that pushed back the Wehrmacht also pulled down the pillars of European power. We benefited from the first half of that movement and were diminished by the second. We can still be grateful to the young American soldiers buried in Normandy, Lorraine and the Ardennes. Most had not chosen to be there. They were fighting first for their own, not for ours. Their deaths remain tragic, and we did partially benefit from their sacrifice. Gratitude toward them is owed and should be plainly expressed. It is a separate question from the strategic intentions of the government that sent them. The choice facing Western Europe in 1945 was real: vassalage to the Germans, vassalage to the Soviets, or vassalage to the Americans. Of the three, American tutelage was by far the least brutal, the least extractive, and the most compatible with the survival of parliamentary institutions and a measure of prosperity. That is not in dispute. But the lesser of three evils is not generosity. Vassalage is not liberation. The two should never be confused. The lesson is ours to draw. No one but Europeans will ever defend the interests of European children. It is time to reclaim our independence, so that our children inherit a future of their own, and not one held hostage to the shifting interests of Washington.

@alexiskarklins Malheureusement c’est comme les MAGAs, est ce que les électeurs de Bardella lisent, argumentent et savent développer un sens critique … 🫤

Décryptons les propos de Jordan Bardella sur le bilan Orbàn 1. "les accusations incessantes des institutions européennes ces dernières années contre la démocratie hongroise étaient infondées" ▶️ Raccourci. Les accusations ne portaient pas sur la tenue d'élections mais sur la corruption, la concentration des pouvoirs, le contrôle des médias et l'entente avec la Russie de Poutine au détriment des intérêts européens. 2. "Viktor Orbán est un grand patriote" ▶️ Selon quels critères ? (on aurait envie de dire "de quel pays ?") 3. "qui aura achevé durant son mandat le rattrapage économique de la Hongrie" ▶️ Réducteur : la Hongrie d'Orbàn a connu une évolution économique proche de celles de la République Tchèque ou de la Slovaquie, mais moins favorable que celle de la Pologne. 4. "promu des politiques familiales qui ont permis de protéger la natalité" ▶️ Trompeur, car après un petit rebond qui a suivi les mesures pro-natalistes mises en place dans les années 2010, la natalité hongroise a de nouveau reculé. La population totale continue de baisser tandis que l'âge moyen des Hongrois s'accroît d'année en année. 5. "et défendu les frontières de son pays et de l’Europe face aux flux migratoires". ▶️ Ironique, puisque la Hongrie, pour pallier sa dénatalité et la baisse de sa population, a justement eu recours à une immigration accrue ("importation temporaire de force de travail") au cours des dernières années, notamment en provenance d'Asie. 6 "Espérons de son successeur qu’il gouverne dans l’intérêt exclusif de son pays et de son peuple." ▶️ Ironique là encore car ce serait l'inverse d'Orbàn qui, selon certaines sources, s'est enrichi de façon considérable pendant ses années au pouvoir. Pour rappel, la Hongrie était 84e dans le dernier classement de la corruption de Transparency International. Bref, un ensemble d'approximations, de mensonges et d'affirmations qui prêtent à sourire si le destin de l'Europe n'était en jeu.

@javedhassan @tparsi @mb_ghalibaf @ryangrim @samirahmed14 @humza_jilani @citrinowicz @glcarlstrom @s_m_marandi @esaagar @samigodil And then it's the common people who will pay exorbitant prices for their gas, Americans, Asians, and Europeans alike... thank you 🤬 #Theatre #mendacity

So, a couple of the boys have been texting me: “Why the hell would Trump drop the Hormuz blockade bomb on a Sunday? It’ll send oil screaming past $120, maybe $130 if the algos really panic. Makes zero sense if you actually want cheaper barrels.” But it makes perfect sense. Beautiful, even. See, Tokyo and Hong Kong are already humming by the time the East Coast is still nursing its coffee. Those futures pits—Dow, S&P, the whole equity complex, plus Brent and WTI on the screens—never really sleep. You’ve got fourteen, fifteen hours of runway before the New York bell. Plenty of time for the right hands to lean in: long the indices in Hong Kong, short the crude in Tokyo, riding the fear wave as the blockade tweet lights up every terminal from Singapore to Sydney. Then, right on cue, before the U.S. opens, comes the pivot. Something about “there’s regime change in Tehran,” “we can do business,” “Talks were Good,” the usual art-of-the-deal baloney. Markets whip around like they’ve been Tasered. Oil gives back the spike, stocks rip higher. The boys in Asia unwind clean, pocket the spread. A few hundred million, maybe more, conjured out of thin air on the back of one perfectly timed Sunday morning post. Not bad for a morning’s work. The Street’s been running these kinds of games for decades: information, timing, leverage. Just never quite so… presidential!!

I think all the European NATO countries should agree to help the US with its war in Iran in every way possible, since it is in our national security interest to obtain a regime change in Iran, put an end to Iran's nuclear program, and destroy its ballistic missiles program, but only on the conditions that: 1. Trump stops supporting Russia in the peace negotiations with Ukraine 2. The US resumes its military support for Ukraine 3. Trump stops all talks about leaving NATO 4. Trump starts acting like a friend and ally instead of consistently insulting all European leaders

Ultimately, it all comes down to money 😣 #ResetWorld

@jeromegodefroy Excellent !!! Mais c’est le même 🤭

Two days before Hungary’s election, Trump pledges to buy votes for Viktor Orban with US taxpayer dollars.

For what Triumph ?? 😤

World's most powerful reset.

Incroyable de sortir ce genre de post à la veille d’une négociation pour laquelle le monde retient son souffle…. On devrait aussi faire un reset de l’Otan… #Reset #StopWar #TrumpWarCriminal

Investors are sleepwalking into the biggest repricing of the modern era. When Trump says “WORLD’S MOST POWERFUL RESET,” he isn’t talking rhetoric, he’s signaling a shift in capital flows, risk premiums, energy policy, and global power structures that Wall Street has barely begun to price in. The playbook is about to be rewritten, and most portfolios aren’t ready.

#RutteResign 👻