Patrick Vlaskovits

49.1K posts

Patrick Vlaskovits banner
Patrick Vlaskovits

Patrick Vlaskovits

@Pv

🤖 Cofounder & CEO of @SuperpoweredSDK, cross-platform low latency audio SDK 🔊 Acquired by @splice.

Austin, TX شامل ہوئے Aralık 2009
1.5K فالونگ12K فالوورز
Patrick Vlaskovits
@bollobas Have thought of spinning up facial recognition and feeding it old photos of people in and around Budapest -- seeing if I can find my grandparents and parents.
English
0
0
1
20
Mark Bollobás
Mark Bollobás@bollobas·
@Pv Me too. I know I’ll find one eventually, I hope you do too!
English
1
0
1
15
Északifül_2.0🇭🇺🦉
Északifül_2.0🇭🇺🦉@Vojpel_eszak2·
It is mentioned by both Friar Julianus and another Friar: Aeneas Sylvius Piccolomini that the Eastern Hungarians (in the 13-15th century) who remained in the Volga region lived in houses and had villages, the later also mentions the stubborn worship of idols by these Hungarians.
Északifül_2.0🇭🇺🦉 tweet mediaÉszakifül_2.0🇭🇺🦉 tweet media
English
2
8
29
798
Patrick Vlaskovits ری ٹویٹ کیا
Mike Hoffmann
Mike Hoffmann@MrPassive_·
The parenting books don’t do enough to warn you about the fact that work ends at 5:00, the school gets out at 2, and soccer starts at 3:30.
English
190
723
35.4K
1.8M
Patrick Vlaskovits ری ٹویٹ کیا
Patrick Vlaskovits ری ٹویٹ کیا
Arnaud Bertrand
Arnaud Bertrand@RnaudBertrand·
Probably the funniest graph ever published by the FT: our 3 possible futures are either 1) infinite wealth and abundance, 2) human extinction or 3) 0.2% faster GDP growth 🤣
Arnaud Bertrand tweet media
English
190
1.3K
11.3K
530.2K
Patrick Vlaskovits ری ٹویٹ کیا
Chris Wood
Chris Wood@CWood_sdf·
i love how people are saying "if we write a sufficiently detailed specification, the agent can write all our code" do you know what writing a sufficiently detailed specification that deterministically maps to what a computer's actions is? it's coding
English
330
1.5K
19.3K
456K
Patrick Vlaskovits
@jde1981 As I am sure you know, sometimes responding too fast and too soon, spawns 100x more emails. So like I noted -- it can be sense of urgency or it can be lack of focus too.
English
1
0
1
8
JD E.
JD E.@jde1981·
@Pv Pretty strong disagree and have seen the same. Including many super successful businessmen. I think it’s generally having nearly persistent urgency + exceptional work ethic.
English
1
0
0
27
Patrick Vlaskovits
If you're a founder, don't for a single moment think that answering emails faster/slower is some magic predictor that determines success/fundraising/company outcomes. Sometimes replying in 30 secs signals urgency and competence, sometimes it signals desperation and zero prioritization. Conversely, slow replies can mean focus or disorganization. Contra to the claim, there is no universal “winner behavior” here. Most of this discourse is just investors trying to condition founders into performative availability and obsequiousness.
Adam Shuaib@adamshuaib

We went through 25,000 emails over 12yrs and calculated the average email response times across 10,000 seed founders. The ones who went on to build big companies replied twice as fast as everyone else. The gap was much bigger than we expected. It held across timezones, vintages and verticals. The emails from successful founders were also 20-30% shorter on average. Speed is usually good evidence of a founder being relentless about things that actually moved the company forward. By not letting small decision backlogs accumulate, those minor efficiency gains compound exponentially across thousands of interactions a year. The slow responders had longer, more polished, better written emails. But they often arrived a day (or more) late. One truism in VC is that the best founders are too busy and don’t have time to respond. Our work shows this to be unequivocally false. You can fake a lot of things as a founder. You can't fake speed.

English
2
0
0
236
Patrick Vlaskovits
@anomalie_blue Washington was an absolute unit. Steadfast, physically stout and while 'uneducated', a lifelong auto-didact. Chernow's biography on him is outstanding.
English
0
0
1
82
Helen
Helen@anomalie_blue·
Interesting that Washington didn’t seem to exhibit the “nerd jock tradeoff” where physical exertion draws energy away from the brain and makes you dumber... He was an avid reader and clearly expert strategist.
Ragnar@pikeypilled

George Washington was Yamnaya horse lord

English
2
0
15
1.7K
Patrick Vlaskovits ری ٹویٹ کیا
Roman Helmet Guy
Roman Helmet Guy@romanhelmetguy·
People haven’t lost trust in “science,” they’ve lost trust in a self-selected self-perpetuating academic priest class who rely on constant alarmism or revisionism to secure funding and who look upon dissent as heretical to an extent that would make the medieval church blush.
Simon Maechling@simonmaechling

The collapse of trust in science is going to go down in history as one of the most sad, bizarre, and destructive social contagions of modern times. We fed billions, cured diseases and powered nations - yet people ran toward conspiracies instead.

English
275
2.5K
17.8K
347.8K
Antonio García Martínez (agm.eth)
(Every conversation I've ever had with an Ivy grad about schooling.) Them: I don't think it's that important and wouldn't push it with my kids. Me: Not having an Ivy background ruined my life, and there's no way my children are going without.
English
73
14
759
132.5K
Patrick Vlaskovits
@owroot All fitnessmaxxing and biohacking turns into hyper-neuroticism at some point. Inevitable slippery slope.
English
0
0
0
90
O.W. Root
O.W. Root@owroot·
I’ve been in Italy for the past week discussing Josef Pieper’s “Leisure: The Basis of Culture” so perhaps the concept of leisure is on my mind more than usual but the idea that fitness maxxing is anything leisurely is ridiculous. Running is good, working out is good, staying fit is good, being healthy is good. Turning life into a series of perpetual fitness maxxed events is sad, boring and anti-culture.
O.W. Root tweet media
Derek Thompson@DKThomp

The future of leisure is fitness, running clubs are replacing night clubs for young people, alcohol consumption is falling, and oral GLP1s are going to melt literally billions of pounds of visceral and subcutaneous fat in the next decade in America. The future is gonna be fit as hell (and a little bit boring)

English
22
14
399
41.1K
Patrick Vlaskovits
@scottastevenson "2. Filter and use lossy compression constantly, enabling you to discard a lot of information" Isn't this what normies call "focus"? :)
English
0
0
0
45
Scott Stevenson
Scott Stevenson@scottastevenson·
Many people just give up when their context window gets overwhelmed. If you can handle large amounts of information coming at you from many directions, it’s actually very rare to be able to deal with that well. You need to wire your brain to do one of two things: 1. Compress context to fit in your window constantly (lossless) 2. Filter and use lossy compression constantly, enabling you to discard a lot of information These are skills that impact the core of how you think and process information. They can be learned but it takes a lot of practice.
English
4
4
44
3K
Mathias
Mathias@bucephalus424·
Analogizing Yugoslavia to Great Britain - this is why you read old books
Mathias tweet media
English
6
19
135
8.5K
srnorty
srnorty@srnorty·
Not inevitable defeat. Canada would be the defender - that's a significant advantage. And it would be reinforced with European troops & weapons, who outnumber the Americans. It could well be a hard war, but if it fought, it would probably win. If Canada was taken by the Americans, it would become a geopolitical irrelevance - it would become a cold Mexico, poor & put-upon. But if it's Europe's key ally on the North American continent, it becomes geopolitically vital, and so wealthy and privileged - a large-scale Switzerland or Norway. That's what it would be fighting for.
English
3
0
0
92
John Carter
John Carter@martianwyrdlord·
When asked who we are, all they can do is vaguepost about "values" they avoid defining, but which they insist are our defining feature. When pressed to be specific, they say the "values" that unite "us" are things like tolerance and equality, which were invented 5 minutes ago and have nothing to do with the biocultural heritage that actually defines us. "Value" traces back to the marketplace, meaning the worth or price of a thing. Values are things you hold, meaning that they can be picked up, discarded, bought, sold, traded away. They are essentially just beliefs, or statements about beliefs, and beliefs can change without changing the essence of the believer. Notice that you never hear them talk about "virtue" anymore. Virtue originates on the battlefield, from Latin virtus: strength, manliness, excellence. Virtues are defining, intrinsic features, which have nothing to do with belief, and everything to do with essence. Consider "I value the truth" vs "I am truthful". The former is non-commital, it says nothing about whether you are being truthful; the latter is a description of what you are. It takes no effort at all to "value" truth; being truthful can be extremely difficult. They prefer values to virtues because values are easy to hold (or to change), can be used to extend the boundaries of imaginary moral communities including all those who "hold the same values" (regardless of whether they even do), and are cheap to talk about. It lets them present themselves as good people because they believe good things, according to whatever set of "values" they use to define "good". As long as they say the right things they can do whatever they want.
Kaja Kallas@kajakallas

Europe is not just about geography, it's also about the values and principles we share. That’s why we are glad to welcome Canada at the European Political Community meeting today to discuss common issues. We will be talking about connectivity, but also resilience to the threats we are all facing. My doorstep ↓

English
16
102
720
23.8K