Kure

@ubiquitousnewt @TheOmniLiberal This reads like a long genetic fallacy. Ok we understand you think he’s mean. Do you have a rejoinder to any arguments?

I wouldn't describe Rachel or Andrew Wilson as an authority on stable motherhood or relationships. She has 5 children to 3 different Fathers. One man abandoned her and his two kids over vague “personal issues.” The next Father was a criminal drug abuser who abandoned her and their one child fleeing legal trouble. Only Andrew Wilson gave her the trad family she now preaches. But he only committed to her after he was able to confirm the kids were his via DNA testing. What does that suggest about the dynamic? Rachel has shown self awareness and knows how her blended family looks, downplaying it as “youthful mistakes”. But mistakes these are not. This a well documented, multi year, behavioural pattern of maladaptive mate selection; serial monogamy with successively dysfunctional, low stability males, resulting in three different fathers for five children, two periods of single motherhood, and one tragic child fatality. And yet, she and Andrew think they are best placed to be critics of modern women and they are ab authority of what benevolent, stable family life should be like. Rachel and Andrew have built their entire brand shaming modern women for low partner standards, serial monogamy, single motherhood, and multiple baby daddies, the exact life she lived. Hypocrisy on full display. What kind of man is drawn to such a woman like Rachel Wilson to begin with? Well, Andrew is a bit of a bastard isn't he. Andrew Wilson’s core traits are abrasive high conflict dominance, arrogance paired with defensive aggression, and a rigid insistence on his unchallenged authority. You can see repeatedly by from his debate footage that he is irritable, rude, and bullying in style. Yes, he can be sharp and logical but he routinely shifts to personal attacks, insults, and verbal aggression when he perceives his authority or family is directly challenged. I don't think he can organically evoke genuine deference or voluntary submission from a desirable, respectable, agentic, and stable woman. Such a woman has independent, better mating options and would probably reject the unilateral “he is in charge of everything” authority because it clashes with her core traits. Rachel, shaped by a pattern of suboptimal mate selection and multiple children, has limited mating alternatives. So she explicitly conforms. She states on record that submission means “you submit to your husband in all things,” that Andrew holds charge of everything, and that she performs total domestic service because his dependability finally enabled the homemaking role her prior partners could not. He secures what he needs through a partner whose baggage makes compliance the rational exchange for security. They portray this trade off via a christian redemption narrative they co brand. Interesting.

@AuronMacintyre You should familiarize yourself with methodological individualism and elite theory.

The purpose of a system is what it does

@LactoidTV Why do you give credence to elections?

Congratulations to #Orban for not being a dictator and actually allowing elections when the Hungarian constitution requires them, and conceding when he loses said election. Now #Zelenskyy should do the same.

@jakeshieldsajj Zulu or Praxben. Don’t let Haz go after low hanging fruit. Don’t dodge or pretend there isn’t competent or serious opposition willing to defend Capitalism.

Since I was unable to find any large or mid-size accounts to defend capitalism in a debate does anyone want to defend MAGA or Zionism?

@AuronMacintyre So does Gods authority only come from the fact that he’s more powerful than all other entities? It seems your position is justification is in virtue of force alone.

Throughout history sovereignty has been tied to violence In the ancient republic citizenship belonged to those who would fight on behalf of the city In a feudal system the aristocracy was comprised of a warrior class, Machiavelli said that battle should be the primary art of the prince This is just a return to the most basic relationship which undergirds authority Violence is the ultimate authority, from which all other authority derives And it is service, the willingness to do violence on behalf of the body poetic, which confers citizenship aka access to the franchise

@AuronMacintyre What he’s saying is that Sauer hasn’t sufficiently demonstrated that the amendment was initially intended, meant, and understood to exclude the type of behavior described. In this clip no strong argument seems to have been given.

My kingdom for a chief justice that isn't retarded

@realannapaulina None of this will do anything while democracy is still in place.

How to fix the country: 💡Voter ID 💡Ban Insider Trading 💡Campaign Finance Reform.

@krystalball @notsoErudite I don’t recall seeing anyone fired or at least anyone mainstream attention for anyway not worshipping him but rather for people who celebrated his death openly. Your framing is highly inaccurate.

Just remembering when hundreds of people were fired for not being sufficiently worshipful of Charlie Kirk after he was killed.

@GmorganJr You do realize this is just an affirmation of might makes right ethics.

No country has a right to exist. It’s yours if you can keep it.

@GamersNexus I don’t see anything wrong with profiting off of a war.

NVIDIA, the company that partnered with war profiteer Palantir to "accelerate everything they do," wants you to know it really loves Palantir. Here's their late Valentine's Day card, complete with <3s

@LactoidTV @JebTanRIP Agreed.

@JebTanRIP Supah Hot impressed me alot in this fight despite losing. Not only is Gypsy bigger and taller, but he has actual fighting experience. Supah Hot is a memer. If Supah trained more, I think he very well may have won.

Man the racist guy fought a guy clearly like 30+ lbs lighter than him and in much worse shape and only took it by split decision. ROUGH

@thinkplayndream Kasamir what do you think about anarcho communism.

@ItIsHoeMath Sounds like determinism.

If heaven is real, then "don't resist evil" is actually the best way to live. You suffer in this life when evil attacks, but you are welcomed into the next life, where evil is not allowed. I just don't see any heaven, is all.

@davidzweig @imbrettcooper Animals don’t have rights. They own the animals. Stop buying the food and maybe they’ll change their practices.

This is an issue conservatives and progressives should unite behind. A society that knowingly and willfully condemns millions of sentient animals to a lifetime of extreme misery and cruelty is not what America should be. Contact your Congress member.

@SenSanders It’s insane how regulated sandwich shops are.

Walk into a sandwich shop. It’s regulated for health and safety. But AI, which will transform the world economically and socially, is completely unregulated. That’s insane. We need to make certain that AI works for ALL humanity, not just the billionaires who own it.

@AuronMacintyre Stop talking about economics. Stick to things you do better.

Capitalism is the most generally beneficial economic system we know but this is the worst possible case for it Giant tvs are cheaper but housing, medical care, education, and everything people actually need to have a family has exploded in cost

@notsoErudite Well he killed himself while hiding in a bunker. I’m not sure I’d call that courageous, he did not want to face the Jewish wrath.

@Drift0r Because the people making big moves in the market know better than you and they realize those things are not happening or are smaller scale than your exaggerated description.

Why is the the market slightly up today despite WW3 potentially kicking off, trade slowing, tariffs up, and instability everywhere? I'm starting the fear the stock market has fully disconnected itself from reality.

@Ace_Archist There’s no contradiction between Libertarianism and nationalism because a state is not a necessary condition of nationalism.

It was such a tragic mistake on behalf of libertarians to court nationalists into the movement. That’s why you have people now who genuinely think that libertarianism is a type of governance for a specific people or country.

@PaulTassi Just get rid of IP (state granted monopolies) and then we will see some competition.

Gross