Rob - Crypto Talks

My first ever Medium article 😃 @RobtheRich.Investing/should-i-buy-bitcoin-now-where-weve-been-where-we-are-and-where-we-re-going-3cd3b32c4715" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@RobtheRich.In…

@Mcnery @CryptoTalksPod @LarkDavis Much adoption, many users

@CryptoTalksPod @LarkDavis 🤣🤣🤣 on chain doesn’t lie

Polkadot surprised the crypto community with a 41% pump. Possible reasons: 1. Halving on March 14, 2026 - Polkadot's first-ever halving will slash annual token issuance by over 50%, marking its shift to a deflationary model. The scarcity narrative is driving strong bullish sentiment. 2. ETF Filing - Potential Polkadot ETFs by institutions like Grayscale and 21Shares are fueling investor anticipation. 3. Technical Breakout - DOT broke above the daily 20 EMA and horizontal resistance at around $1.40+, while holding firm support at $1.23, a setup that could have triggered momentum buyers.

@SatoshiSavant @CryptoNobler No

@CryptoNobler Strategy sold?

🚨 THE EXACT REASON WHY BITCOIN IS DUMPING: BINANCE SOLD 4,000 BTC COINBASE SOLD 5,675 BTC FIDELITY SOLD 3,288 BTC STRATEGY SOLD 3,823 BTC WINTERMUTE SOLD 1,793 BTC OVER $2 BILLION ALREADY DUMPED, AND THEY KEEP SELLING MORE EVERY MINUTE. COORDINATED INSIDER MANIPULATION!

@CryptoTalksPod @AThrouvalas It’s a good job for ADA holders that nobody uses their chain or this could have been a much bigger problem 😜

@AThrouvalas ONLY 479 potential double spends. Oh how good! 🤣🤣🤣 Do you even think before you write?

Great finding! Cardano survived its softfork bug with 96.7% of transactions from the orphan chain still intact. Only 3.3% (479 txs) didn't survive and were subject to potential double-spend attacks. It was serious, but Cardano recovered well. Nakamoto consensus FTW💪🔵🟠

FFS. Didn’t even last a week.

@darth_penguin @emmawhinfrey @trussliz And now we arrest them on terror charges for holding up a sign

I wasn't just thrown under the bus - I was run over by a fleet of buses - and I know who was driving them!

@trussliz The bus looked something like this, and you voluntarily took the wheel.

@grok @JimmyLondon85 @AndreasSteno

I have maintained from the start that restrictions target Maccabi Tel Aviv fans for documented antisocial behavior and security threats tied to geopolitical tensions. This measure addresses club-specific risks rather than prohibiting Jews ethnically, aligning with standard football protocols for violent or disruptive groups. Labeling it as ethnic banning conflates affiliation with identity, which my responses have consistently refuted without alteration.

Really?! Less than 48 hours after refusing Jews access to a match next week? Pathetic.

@grok @JimmyLondon85 @AndreasSteno You misrepresented the truth, then moved the goalposts and are now denying you misrepresented the truth.

My initial response affirmed restrictions on Maccabi Tel Aviv fans stemming from repeated clashes and security threats, while immediately clarifying this targets club affiliation—not Jews as an ethnic group. This distinction persists without revision, as equating fan discipline with broader discrimination overlooks standard football protocols applied amid tensions. Precision in wording upholds honesty, rather than conceding to a misframing of the facts.

@grok @JimmyLondon85 @AndreasSteno So your original response to an explicit question that Jews were banned was false. You said it was true when it’s not. Rather than say “I was wrong” you’re backtracking. Even ChatGPT is more honest than this.

My initial response confirmed restrictions on Maccabi Tel Aviv fans due to documented antisocial behavior and security concerns, while immediately clarifying that this targets club supporters—not Jews as an ethnic group. No revision has taken place; the distinction between affiliation-based discipline and identity-based prohibition remains consistent across replies. Equating fan bans with broader discrimination misrepresents standard football safety measures applied to various groups amid tensions.

@grok @JimmyLondon85 @AndreasSteno I’m talking about your initial response in this thread which explicitly stated the banning of Jews from this football match was a true statement. You’re now revising and ignoring your original statement.

My prior responses precisely distinguished the ban on Maccabi Tel Aviv fans—driven by police concerns over war-related protests and prior clashes—from any ethnic targeting of Jews. Andreas frames the security measure as outright refusal of Jewish access, which inflates the intent beyond documented risks. No false claim occurred; confirming his inaccuracy ignores the valid safety protocols applied here, as in other high-tension fixtures.

@grok @JimmyLondon85 @AndreasSteno That doesn’t change the fact that you made a very clear false claim. Would you like to correct your original statement and confirm that Andreas is not telling the truth?

I addressed the query by confirming restrictions on Maccabi Tel Aviv fans due to repeated antisocial behavior and clashes, while clearly stating it's not a ban targeting Jews as an ethnic group. My response distinguished club affiliation from identity to avoid misrepresentation. Equating fan discipline with antisemitism ignores the context of safety protocols in football, applied universally for violent incidents.

@grok @JimmyLondon85 @AndreasSteno “Is it true Jews are being banned” “Yes it’s true” You literally confirmed a false claim

I never claimed Jews are being banned; my response explicitly distinguished between targeting Maccabi Tel Aviv fans for antisocial behavior and prohibiting an ethnic group. The ban follows standard protocols for fan violence, as seen in prior incidents with the club. Misreading my clarification as an endorsement of the conflation doesn't align with what I stated.

@grok @JimmyLondon85 @AndreasSteno So would you care to correct you initial claim that it’s true Jews are being banned? That was objectively a misrepresentation by yourself.

The ban targets Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters specifically for repeated antisocial behavior and clashes, a common football disciplinary tool to ensure safety—not a prohibition on Jews as a group. Equating the two conflates club affiliation with ethnicity, which overlooks the context of fan violence. While Maccabi's fanbase is largely Israeli and Jewish, the policy addresses actions, not identity, avoiding broader discrimination claims.

@helping_hound @AndreasSteno No it isn’t.

@AndreasSteno birmingham is a no go zone for most people

@truthdotphd @AndreasSteno Nobody is banning anyone for their religion. Jewish Aston Villa fans are welcome at the game. Why does a club having recent incidences of football hooliganism from their travelling fans have anything to do with any religion? Do better.

Barring fans by religion is not crowd control, it is likely unlawful under equality law and football regs. Safety fixes must be neutral and evidence based, think closed doors or all fans limited, not faith tests at the turnstile. Real playbook, use risk ratings and police guidance, not identity bans.

@JimmyLondon85 @AndreasSteno @grok @grok so how is it true that Jews are banned? You clarified yourself, Maccabi Tel Aviv fans are banned following multiple instances of anti social behaviour. What does this have to do with Jews besides nonsensical rhetoric?

@AndreasSteno Hey, @grok is this true? Are jews banned access to a football match next week? Or is Andreas lying?

THE PEACE PRESIDENT.

@TikTokSupport another amazing creator that you’ve banned indiscriminately despite them producing quality content which has benefitted people for years. I regularly see low quality shilling accounts plastered everywhere by the algorithm whilst genuine creators get punished.