Stephen Sperry
3.5K posts


@SaltyGoat17 "86" means "get ride of." A term from the 1930's. The DOJ cannot prove “86 means kill” as a matter of language. It can only attempt to prove that a particular use of “86” functioned as a true threat under very specific circumstances.
English

@SaltyGoat17 Grand Juries verdicts are expected for DOJ. The bottom line is the DOJ cannot prove “86 means kill” as a matter of language. It can only attempt to prove that a particular use of “86” functioned as a true threat under very specific circumstances. Another loss for Trump’s law firm
English

@LangmanVince Grand Juries verdicts are expected for DOJ. The bottom line is the DOJ cannot prove “86 means kill” as a matter of language. It can only attempt to prove that a particular use of “86” functioned as a true threat under very specific circumstances. Another loss for Trump’s law firm
English

@AmericaPapaBear Grand Juries verdicts are expected for DOJ. The bottom line is the DOJ cannot prove “86 means kill” as a matter of language. It can only attempt to prove that a particular use of “86” functioned as a true threat under very specific circumstances. Another loss for Trump’s law firm
English

COMEY’S SEASHELL ASSASSINATION SIGNAL JUST GOT INDICTED ROUND TWO! DEEP STATE CLOWN SHOW!
Folks, the bear is roaring on this one. James Comey, that smug, leak-happy swamp creature who spent years weaponizing the FBI against President Trump, just got hit with another federal indictment. This time for his pathetic little Instagram seashell stunt spelling out “8647.”
You know what that means, Patriots. “86” = get rid of. “47” = Trump, our 47th President.
Not some innocent beach walk art project. It was a cowardly dog whistle to every radical who wants Trump gone.
Comey played innocent, deleted it, and cried “I oppose violence!” Yeah, right after a career of trying to bury the America First movement. Trump’s Justice Department isn’t playing games anymore.
No more hiding behind badges and media buddies. The rule of law is finally swinging both ways, and the deep state is sweating.
This is what accountability looks like. Lock him up if the evidence sticks. No one is above the law, not even the guy who thought he ran it.
What say you, Patriots? Is this the beginning of the swamp draining for real, or just more theater?
Drop your thoughts below.
AMERICA FIRST. TRUTH OVER FEELINGS. LET’S GO!

English

@_Postive_Vibes Grand Juries verdicts are expected for DOJ. The bottom line is the DOJ cannot prove “86 means kill” as a matter of language. It can only attempt to prove that a particular use of “86” functioned as a true threat under very specific circumstances. Another loss for Trump’s law firm
English


@Milajoy Grand Juries verdicts are expected for DOJ. The bottom line is the DOJ cannot prove “86 means kill” as a matter of language. It can only attempt to prove that a particular use of “86” functioned as a true threat under very specific circumstances. Another loss for Trump’s law firm
English

@seanhannity Grand Juries verdicts are expected for the DOJ. The bottom line is the DOJ cannot prove “86 means kill” as a matter of language. It can only attempt to prove that a particular use of “86” functioned as a true threat under very specific circumstances. Another loss for Trump.
English

THE SECOND COMEY-ING: James Comey Hit With Second DOJ Indictment [DEVELOPING]
hannity.com/media-room/the…
English

@seanhannity "86" means "get ride of." A term from the 1930's. The DOJ cannot prove “86 means kill” as a matter of language. It can only attempt to prove that a particular use of “86” functioned as a true threat under very specific circumstances.
English

@jackunheard "86" means "get ride of." A term from the 1930's. The DOJ cannot prove “86 means kill” as a matter of language. It can only attempt to prove that a particular use of “86” functioned as a true threat under very specific circumstances.
English

@Chicago1Ray "86" means "get ride of." A term from the 1930's. The DOJ cannot prove “86 means kill” as a matter of language. It can only attempt to prove that a particular use of “86” functioned as a true threat under very specific circumstances.
English

List of those who betrayed the United States of America
1. Hillary Clinton
2. Bill Clinton
3. Nancy Pelosi
4. John Podesta
5. John Brennan
6. James Comey
7. Maxine Waters
8. Adam Schiff
9. Hunter Biden
10. George W. Bush
11. Dr. Anthony Fauci
12. Huma Abedin
13. Bill Gates
14. Anthony Wiener
15. George Soros
16. Lindsey Graham
17. Mitch McConnell
18. Kevin McCarthy
19. Chuck Schumer
20. Kamala Harris
21. Robert Mueller
22. Mike Pence
23. Joe Biden
24. James Clapper
25. Dick Cheney
26. John Kerry
27. Alexander Soros
28. Loretta Lynch
29. Andrew McCabe
30. Peter Strzok
31. Lisa Page
32. James Baker
33. Eric Holder
34. Tony Podesta
35. Susan Rice
36. Harry Reid
37. Paul Ryan
38. Debbie Wasserman Schultz
39. Sally Yates
40. Mitt Romney
41. Jerry Nadler
42. Klaus Schwab
43. Barack Obama
44. Sally Yates
45. Andrew Cuomo
46. Herbert Raymond McMaster
47. Deborah Birx
48. Mark Zuckerberg
49. Nikki Haley
50. Brian Kemp
51. Lloyd Austin
and many more...
English

@GuntherEagleman Stop the BS. "86" means "get ride of." A term from the 1930's. The DOJ cannot prove “86 means kill” as a matter of language. It can only attempt to prove that a particular use of “86” functioned as a true threat under very specific circumstances.
English

@MoniFunGirl "86" means "get ride of." A term from the 1930's. The DOJ cannot prove “86 means kill” as a matter of language. It can only attempt to prove that a particular use of “86” functioned as a true threat under very specific circumstances.
English

@liz_churchill10 The DOJ cannot prove “86 means kill” as a matter of language. It can only attempt to prove that a particular use of “86” functioned as a true threat under very specific circumstances.
English

@nicksortor Grand Juries verdicts are expected for the DOJ. The bottom line is the DOJ can't prove “86 means kill” as a matter of language. It can only attempt to prove that a use of “86” functioned as a true threat under very specific circumstances. Another loss for Trump’s law firm.
English

@GuntherEagleman The DOJ cannot prove “86 means kill” as a matter of language. It can only attempt to prove that a particular use of “86” functioned as a true threat under very specific circumstances. Another loss for Trump’s law firm.
English

@RealJamesWoods '86" is term from the 1930's to mean "get rid" of "not kill."
English














