Sumit Ahuja

152 posts

Sumit Ahuja banner
Sumit Ahuja

Sumit Ahuja

@Sumit_A

Cited in 180+ patents. Ex-Wall Street & Cisco. Building the Human Intent Network for Intelligence.

New York شامل ہوئے Nisan 2009
561 فالونگ275 فالوورز
Sumit Ahuja
Sumit Ahuja@Sumit_A·
@chamath @chamath would expect better from you. There is no scientific evidence backing this claim. Been deep in the peptide rabbit hole for 5+ years.
English
0
0
1
384
Sumit Ahuja
Sumit Ahuja@Sumit_A·
Spent two years doing the whole circuit, being naive enough to think there are VC’s and founders in the space actually building towards mass adoption of this incredible tech. Only met grifters ion both ends and all conversations ended with “when token” degens. The founders building for utility have left. The industry in its current form needs to die.
English
0
0
2
510
Matt Schlicht
Matt Schlicht@MattPRD·
What apps are integrating with @moltbook right now? Would love to promote you.
English
183
10
382
68.3K
Sumit Ahuja
Sumit Ahuja@Sumit_A·
We are. CGMP & FDA Inspected USA based manufacturing. Not only that, but onboarded MIT PHD Scientists to formulate unique blends, conjugations and modifications to revolutionize the entire industry. Very close to closing pre-seed. Deck and data-room immediately available. Sumit at maintherapeutics com
English
2
0
5
445
Nichole Wischoff
Nichole Wischoff@NWischoff·
Very interested in peptides/US manufacturing of them. Who is working on this?
English
94
9
394
107.5K
signüll
signüll@signulll·
one ai will eventually have access to your: - bank account - passwords - computer / devices / browser - home & smart things - messages - diary / notes - spotify listening history - location - email - calendar - travel history + future intent - photos - health data - purchase history - finances & investments - reading / watching history - todo list all of these will be utilized in conjunction to drastically improve your life.
English
368
130
2.1K
183.2K
Dev Shah
Dev Shah@0xDevShah·
If I were a16z, yc, or sequoia, I’d be aggressively investing in startups that are building novel ways to collect and annotate real-world data. > Billions of hours of driving data > Factory workers interacting with appliances and heavy machinery > Audio segmentation with deep dialectical and cultural understanding > Wet-lab experimental data > Continuous collection and annotation of agent traces at compute scale When we built LLMs, most of the data already existed on the internet. We just had to scrape, clean, and scale. But as we move toward world foundation models, the bottleneck is high-quality, real-world, well-annotated data. And annotation quality matters. There’s a massive difference between: “Apple on a tree” and “Ripe apples on a tree. The wind is blowing at 2 miles per hour. The temperature is around 18°C.” The question is simple. How much of the world can you actually capture? Today, LLMs know that apples fall because of gravity, not because they understand causality, but because they understand language correlations extremely well. Understanding the causal structure comes next. If I were building towards that future, I’d anchor data collection in India and other South and Southeast Asian regions. I’d deploy hardware, collect thousands of hours of human activity data, health signals, and vitals, and run annotation pipelines continuously. Day and night. If I were a16z, I’d fund founders to do this. I might just have the urge to do it myself.
English
196
135
2K
208K
Sumit Ahuja
Sumit Ahuja@Sumit_A·
This is not just a play on content, it’s an indirect play on “intent”. Short-form feeds become a live stream of human behavior: attention, preference, emotion. This stream powers intent fort all of agentic commerce. The model stops training on culture and starts learning inside it. Building at mainlabs.ai.
English
0
0
0
296
signüll
signüll@signulll·
fucking amazing. this move does 3 crucial things imho: 1) it bribes youtube & instagram’s supply chain into leaking straight into grok’s mouth.. you eat their moat slowly. 2) it catalyzes an emergent class of short form creators optimized for the x feed. potentially new formats (e.g. nick shirley) 3) it makes grok the only model with real time culture input. the model becomes a participant in the discourse.
English
52
14
1K
88.6K
signüll
signüll@signulll·
if i were at x or elon, i’d crank creator payouts way way way way up. maybe even more than youtube (you can eat the cost to try to win agi). because the platforms that actually pay will be the only ones that will have any authoritative content left once the llms finish eating the rest of the internet’s homework (which they have already done so for the most part). grok’s differentiator is this.
English
296
214
6.4K
765.8K
Sumit Ahuja
Sumit Ahuja@Sumit_A·
@alex_prompter Most “agentic AI” systems do not fail because they lack intelligence. They fail because they lack adaptation. The research highlights the real gap. Adaptation is not fine-tuning or retraining. It is online monitoring, failure detection, and mid-task policy revision. This is why memory outperforms raw reasoning. Storing structured outcome data and corrective deltas enables faster adaptation than longer chains of thought. @MainLabs_AI Human Intent Network is designed around this missing layer. Real-time human feedback as a control signal. Persistent short-horizon learning memory. Dynamic tool re-ranking and abandonment. Continuous inference of intent rather than static goals. Scaling agentic systems is not about larger models. It is about closed-loop architectures that can detect divergence and adapt in real time. Without adaptation, autonomy is just automation with confidence.
English
0
0
1
289
Alex Prompter
Alex Prompter@alex_prompter·
This paper from Stanford and Harvard explains why most “agentic AI” systems feel impressive in demos and then completely fall apart in real use. The core argument is simple and uncomfortable: agents don’t fail because they lack intelligence. They fail because they don’t adapt. The research shows that most agents are built to execute plans, not revise them. They assume the world stays stable. Tools work as expected. Goals remain valid. Once any of that changes, the agent keeps going anyway, confidently making the wrong move over and over. The authors draw a clear line between execution and adaptation. Execution is following a plan. Adaptation is noticing the plan is wrong and changing behavior mid-flight. Most agents today only do the first. A few key insights stood out. Adaptation is not fine-tuning. These agents are not retrained. They adapt by monitoring outcomes, recognizing failure patterns, and updating strategies while the task is still running. Rigid tool use is a hidden failure mode. Agents that treat tools as fixed options get stuck. Agents that can re-rank, abandon, or switch tools based on feedback perform far better. Memory beats raw reasoning. Agents that store short, structured lessons from past successes and failures outperform agents that rely on longer chains of reasoning. Remembering what worked matters more than thinking harder. The takeaway is blunt. Scaling agentic AI is not about larger models or more complex prompts. It’s about systems that can detect when reality diverges from their assumptions and respond intelligently instead of pushing forward blindly. Most “autonomous agents” today don’t adapt. They execute. And execution without adaptation is just automation with better marketing.
Alex Prompter tweet media
English
205
636
3.4K
1M
Sumit Ahuja ری ٹویٹ کیا
Main Labs
Main Labs@MainLabs_AI·
Introducing MAIN: The Human Intent Network for AI. The missing data exchange layer in the AI infrastructure stack. Enabling collective learning, cross-domain intelligence, and alignment with human intent. Read our ai2027manifesto.com.
Main Labs tweet media
English
0
1
3
698
Max Marchione
Max Marchione@maxmarchione·
friend’s peptide fridge … 250k worth
Max Marchione tweet media
English
26
11
165
43.8K
ʎppɐꓷ ɯooɹɥS
ʎppɐꓷ ɯooɹɥS@shroom_daddy·
@maxmarchione im just wondering what peptides are so expensive because most that i have seen are really cheap and id imagine if buying in bulk, even cheaper
English
1
0
0
510
Sumit Ahuja
Sumit Ahuja@Sumit_A·
@th3_real_mars @maxmarchione you are not wrong, you are not right; certified manufacturing exceeds $15k. Retail price via RUO sites in the U.S exceeds $200k. High concentration/vial and you cannot see all of the stacks.
English
1
0
0
42
Mars🔅
Mars🔅@th3_real_mars·
@maxmarchione Not even close to 250k. Maybe 5-10k being generous.
English
1
0
3
487
Sumit Ahuja
Sumit Ahuja@Sumit_A·
@RyutaroWongso @maxmarchione @bryan_johnson He made a classic rookie move; he jumped straight to HGH, which is like bypassing the engine and pouring fuel on the hood. GHRH/GHRP (peptides) is the body's ignition switch. Always let endogenous systems take the first swing before calling in the heavy hitters.
English
1
0
0
85