پن کیا گیا ٹویٹ
How DJT fits Roger Griffin's definition of fascism:
(9 parts) 🧵
English
TrueCommons
93 posts
TrueCommons
@TrueCommons
Pro-Equality, Pro-Civil Liberties | Anti-Corporate, Anti-Authoritarian // I study law focusing on employment law and citizen's rights.
United States شامل ہوئے Temmuz 2025
14 فالونگ3 فالوورز
TrueCommons ری ٹویٹ کیا
@The_PITHQ @grok @amuse @ReichlinMelnick You're talking about H.R.3781, not H.R.2436. Either way, it hasn't been passed, therefore it is not a crime.
English
@grok @amuse @ReichlinMelnick Grok is a leftwing extremist. Stop asking it things, it won't tell you the facts. Look up H.R.2436 - Visa Overstays Penalties Act
English
ICE outright lies here by claiming that overstay a visa is a crime. It is not. There is no such crime. They are making it up.
ICE Boston@EROBoston
On Feb. 17, ICE Boston arrested Xiu Ying Zhang, a criminal illegal alien from China. Zhang legally entered the United States on a visitor visa in Oct. 1996 with permission to stay for 30 days. She illegally remained in the United States for nearly 30 years-a crime!
English
The MA Constitution did still enforce Protestantism, but the U.S. Constitution explicitly banned religious tests for federal office. That was a deliberate shift toward secular governance. Separation of church and state means government can’t establish or enforce religion, not that religion is banned from public life. The founders didn’t all change their personal beliefs, but the federal framework they wrote rejected state-enforced faith.
English
@TrueCommons @Cam4txsenate11 @MattWalshBlog The MA state constitution, to name only one, was signed and ratified in 1780.
The idea that the same people who ratified the MA constitution in 1780 did a 180 degree change by 1787 is retarded.
You simply don’t understand what separation of church and state means.
English
Christianity built this country. Islam did not at all in even the slightest way. That’s why we can have our church bells, you ungrateful little bitch.
End Wokeness@EndWokeness
Mehdi Hasan to American Christians: "If you can have your church bell, we can have our Islamic prayer call"
English
@J213Timmy @Cam4txsenate11 @MattWalshBlog This was during the 1600s to the late 1700s. Once the U.S. Constitution was ratified in 1787, Article VI banned any religious test to run for federal office.
English
@Cam4txsenate11 @MattWalshBlog Literally every single state in the original 13 colonies had a clause in their constitution that said you had to be christian in order to hold public office.
The idea that America was not founded as a Christian nation because they did not want a church of England is dumb
English
@Roguendependent @sirDukeDevin Trump’s actions and rhetoric align with fascist movements such as glorifying strongman leadership, undermining democratic institutions, encouraging political violence, and portraying the media and opponents as enemies of the nation.
English
@sirDukeDevin Fuck off dude! The left has been calling us deplorables, fascists, nazi's and worse for years. Now you have a problem with name calling? You sir are the worst kind of human, a hypocrite!
English
The Trump administration is calling the entire left "terrorists" now.
1.) It's not possible for half of the country to be terrorists.
2. If they can call the Democratic Party terrorists, they won't even allow the party to be on the ballot.
3. Kamala predicted all of this.
English
@ChadDixon4daWin @krassenstein I should clarify, I am pro-bodycam in every situation. Just saying your definition of voluntary doesn't legally fit, hence why the OP said force as opposed to volunteer.
English
If we’re talking about vaccines or something else that doesn’t affect the performance of the primary tasks and purpose, I agree. However, surely we can agree if affects performance, provides accountability and reduces liability, then it may be required as a function of employment. Requiring police to record interactions with cameras effectively drastically reduced the claims of wrongdoing.
English
ICE should be forced to wear Body Cameras.
Give me one reason why this is a bad idea.
English
@NickeyDimez @krassenstein What about the people that are detained without a proper investigation? What about the video evidence of ICE agents and other law enforcement officers violating Constitutional rights and overusing force? Transparency is key here.
English
@krassenstein Because the people are here illegally and how they are removed is irrelevant. If they didn’t come here illegally they wouldn’t be forcefully removed.
English
@jtdewitt @krassenstein While safety concerns are understandable, ICE agents (like police officers) should be identifiable when carrying out their duties. Transparency and accountability require that their identities and actions be open to public scrutiny, just as with any law enforcement official.
English
@krassenstein This is actually a point worth considering. Thanks @krassenstein for contributing something meaningful!
Here's a question... If they were to wear cameras, along with their badges/placards, could we consider the protection of their faces/names from publicity OK?
English
@SovereignMindsX @krassenstein Congrats, you just said the quiet part out loud. You think people don’t deserve rights if they’re undocumented. Hate to break it to you, but Constitutional rights don't just stop existing because you weren't born in the U.S., and ICE has a long history of abuse.
English
@krassenstein Well given that the people they arrest have absolutely ZERO rights to start with it seems kinda like a bad idea to me.😂
English
@perinejennifer5 @krassenstein Learn the difference between armed government agents with the legal power to detain, deport, and kill vs. random pissed-off citizens in black hoodies. Forcing private citizens to wear bodycams because you don’t like their politics is literally fascism.
English
@krassenstein Antifa should be forced to wear body cameras.
Give me one reason why this is a bad idea.
🙄🙄🙄
English
@ChadDixon4daWin @krassenstein In U.S. law, something that is voluntary as a condition of employment is generally not truly considered voluntary. Courts often find that when something is required to get or keep your job, it doesn’t meet the standard of being voluntary, even if the employer says it is.
English
@krassenstein Forced, no. Everything should be voluntary. It could be made mandatory as a condition of employment though. Force is wrong.
English
@PaulG_inSC @TwightFinancial @LPCLC_TX There's estimated to be around 14.8m people in the US illegally. Due process is for everyone in the US, born, naturalized, or otherwise. Your refusal to accept the fact that the Supreme Court has said the same thing is pathetic.
English
@TwightFinancial @TrueCommons @LPCLC_TX "Due process" is for people "born or naturalized". Illegal entry does not equate to either "born or naturalized". If you commit a CRIME, you're a CRIMINAL. PERIOD. And there's at least 20 to 30 million here illegally. It's the Dumbocrats illegal future voter drive.
English
@PaulG_inSC @TwightFinancial @LPCLC_TX One is only a criminal after being found guilty in criminal court. You generally do not go to criminal court for immigration law violations.
English
@TwightFinancial @TrueCommons @LPCLC_TX Hey Dana.....A very simple explanation, even for you. Entering the country ILLEGALLY is a CRIME. Once one has committed a CRIME, by definition, one is a CRIMINAL. I'm not sure what's so hard for so many to get through their thick skulls, but......pretty simple.
English
Technically true, there's estimated to be around 11 million undocumented immigrants in the US, with ~45% of them being overstayed visas as opposed to illegal entry (EWI). Immigration law is considered civil law, meaning they aren't usually charged with misdemeanors/felonies. However, civil law IS law nonetheless, which does technically make them lawbreakers, but not criminals. The issue here is the lack of due process and removal of constitutional rights.
English
@PaulG_inSC @TrueCommons @LPCLC_TX There are not 20-30 million lawbreakers. In fact, most of the people being #kidnapped by unnamed people in unmarked vans aren't criminals.
English
Not party specific. Politics, in general, has come down to who is or isn't a pedophile or rapist. People need to start fact-checking things, and in the age of AI, all it takes is a copy-paste and to say, "dumb this down to a 5th grade reading level." At this point, it's obvious that people are either stupid or they just like the drama.
English
Libertarians think of themselves as critical thinkers but see a rumor
On social media once and will spread it defaming someones character without a second thought.
Especially within the libertarian party, we should be protecting each other.
Bare minimum is to ask for proof.
English
@BryceMLipscomb @LLibertadAvanza @LouisianaLp @JMilei Here's the fun thing about libertarianism: you can have yours look like whatever you want.
English
I know this is controversial, but I’d really like my Libertarianism to look more like the right & less like the left.
More @LLibertadAvanza and less @LouisianaLp for me.
English
🚨🚨🚨 I'm going to post this video every day so we never forget what the 34x POS convicted felon & adjudicated rapist Trump did 🚨🚨🚨
English