Jordan Jefferson☦️❤️

@YariLogos It’s amazing how easy it is to find these teachings in every jurisdiction. antiochian.org/regulararticle… antiochian.org/regulararticle…

@truefamilyblood This is a W mans right here!

After a talk with a brother, I’m retiring from X for the rest of Lent. My nous is getting darkened. God forgive me if I was a tool of the devil. Christ is in our midst!

@truefamilyblood @Basedtzarist Brother, this isn’t true, I know many priests who affirm everything the latinizers affirm

@Basedtzarist If people would only listen to their priests and bishops, then you wouldn’t have the Latinizing crowd in the first place.

I’m tired of the EO latinizing vs non latinizing war… it’s just endless mud slinging. Listen to you priest and your bishop and just move on with it

@ErickYbarra3 I need that!!!

Early Release! For scholars and students interested in tracing the doctrine of Penal Substitutionary Atonement (PSA) within early Christian theology, a dedicated volume is now available that examines its foundational presence in Patristic thought and its subsequent development. The work opens with an overview of the core theological concepts, followed by an analysis of their reception and elaboration across the Latin, Byzantine, and Reformed traditions—from the medieval period through the Reformation and into post-Reformation theology. The central section of the volume provides a comprehensive and systematic analysis of more than thirty Church Fathers, drawing directly from primary sources to identify and elucidate the presence, as well as the subtleties and variations, of substitutionary and penal motifs within their respective soteriological frameworks. This examination deliberately transcends a mere florilegium of isolated Patristic quotations. Particular emphasis is placed on situating each Father's statements within their exegetical context, attending closely to the author's explicit rationale and conceptual development. In so doing, the study consciously avoids the word-concept fallacy—the exegetical error of equating the presence or absence of specific terminology with the presence or absence of the underlying theological concept itself—thereby ensuring a more nuanced and defensible interpretation of the sources for those readers who are more conscious of such mistakes. It is available in Hardback, Paperback, and Kindle versions. God bless! amazon.com/dp/B0GT918JN4/…

@AllanRuhl @agusofpare @brycejofficial And Siiig debunked it, the video is on his Patreon

@agusofpare @brycejofficial I sure did.

The east actually always held that they had a different god. There was a synod around 1150 that decreed "Anathema to the god of Muhammad" if we only held it was a heretical view, this would not have been declared. Shortly after schism too.

Deacons do not have the authority to bind anything on anyone Any Dn who claims he does suffers from prelest and promotes a counterfeit Orthodoxy

@MateyYanakiev @blessedmikko @HosannaHosannaa When you have a multitude of scriptures to support your position you can.

@blessedmikko @HosannaHosannaa I love St. Philaret, but this argument is taken straight out of the mouth of Job’s companions. It is not legitimate to reason backward from suffering alone to conclude guilt must be present. Innocent suffering is real.

‘“In the birth of children: in pain you will bear children.” Experience shows that the pains of childbirth are divided between those who give birth and those who are born. But this division would be unjust if the latter were not, like the former, guilty (виновны). To reconcile this kind of punishment with God's justice, it is necessary to acknowledge, on one hand, the suffering of parents is manifested in their children, and on the other, the sinful corruption of children is manifested in their parents.’ –St. Philaret (Drozdov), Interpretation of Genesis 3:14-19

@InspiringPhilos Praying for u!

Pray for us, and pray for them. It’s unfortunate that we have to deal with this, but we know that truth will prevail. Thankfully, this does not reflect the majority of Muslim apologists that we’ve encountered, but the sad truth is, this kind of behavior and ideology is encouraged in the Quran. Your support is helping us stay safe and fight back with logic and reasoned arguments. Thank you

@valorthodoxia @TheOrthoEnsign Can u define what u think PSA is? & then say why it’s heresy?

@TheOrthoEnsign I see your intention isn’t truth. It’s a selfish narrative. That’s why you’re unable to respond.

PSA is not Orthodox.

LMAO

Christ is born. Glorify him

@maksimologija Would you say in it’s possible or impossible to say “ in any sense we exist external to God”?

On the one hand, we do not exist "external to God". Rather «in him we live and move and have our being» (Acts 17.28).

Since I've been asked, I'll explain my scepticism about this latest convertodox grift. I'll talk about: —I. Its apologetics material in general. —II. Particular "answers" it gives to specific questions. —III. Its (lack of) accountability.

@ASanctoThoma Yes there is. St.Cyril of Alexandria

There’s no better exegete of St. Paul than St. Thomas Aquinas.

Good morning! The wonder worker John would like a word with the modernists:

WINONA RYDER DAVID HARBOUR MILLIE BOBBY BROWN FINN WOLFHARD GATEN MATARAZZO CALEB MCLAUGHLIN NOAH SCHNAPP SADIE SINK NATALIA DYER CHARLIE HEATON JOE KEERY MAYA HAWKE BRETT GELMAN PRIAH FERGUSON CARA BUONO JAMIE CAMPBELL BOWER NELL FISHER LINDA HAMILTON LINNEA BERTHELSEN ALEX BREAUX JAKE CONNELLY JOE CHREST RANDY HAVENS AMYBETH MCNULTY

"On the cross all the waves of divine wrath at sin swept over Him as He bore our sins." –Fr. Lawrence Farley, The Mystical Psalter: Historical Analysis and Christian Commentary, Vol. 2, p. 288

@Alex_Ortodoxie U know EO teach a form of PSA, like some of the best EO apologists do so as well!

Yes, there’s a sacrificial element to Christ’s atonement. Yes, there’s a substitutionary element to the atonement. That does not entail the Father damning the Son nor does it entail the forensic imputation doctrine (i.e., PSA).

@KalebAtlanta @benquivenit No

@benquivenit The Holy Gospel in every parish should be KJV, in fact

I would buy this

@jaydyer EO, believes in a form of PSA, we affirm our version of it.

Icons are biblical. Christian Zlonism is a heresy. The eucharist is a real presence. PSA is anti-Trinitarian. Tradition is biblical. Islam is antichrist and false. Evangelicalism is false. The Papacy via Vatican 1 is false. Libertarianism is false. Disagree? Call in and refute me on the space