Matt

1.7K posts

Matt banner
Matt

Matt

@burn2delete

Human Intelligence🤖 - Crafting Magic🪄 in the form of Software⚡️. Product Manager👾 for @apollographql

The Tardis شامل ہوئے Şubat 2023
225 فالونگ94 فالوورز
Matt
Matt@burn2delete·
@mattpocockuk You can get nearly perfect results by removing the often terrible language abstractions and have your agents write Clojure where the abstraction for everything is an s-exp. 👀
English
0
0
0
38
Matt Pocock
Matt Pocock@mattpocockuk·
What 'advanced' AI coding techniques are you using? I.e. what do you feel like you've discovered that no-one else knows about yet?
English
192
16
541
101.1K
Matt
Matt@burn2delete·
@elonmusk Until the economics improve the birth rates will continue to decline.
English
0
1
6
124
Matt
Matt@burn2delete·
@yacineMTB No you shouldn’t. Ask any child psychologist. Kinda need mom and dad until at least age 3.
English
2
0
12
777
kache
kache@yacineMTB·
You should send your kids to daycare by the way
English
118
1
210
178.3K
Matt
Matt@burn2delete·
@thdxr This is the new engineering role. Owning the implementation quality, while deferring the code monkey work to the LLM. It’s a QA role now.
English
1
0
1
48
dax
dax@thdxr·
are there people out there who just want to refactor every day? just wake up and find the worst code and just chip away at it and clean it up wake up the next day do it again, infinitely improving things with zero external impact?
English
776
62
3.4K
313.3K
Matt
Matt@burn2delete·
@rampatra_ I don’t even care what the quality of the code is, can I get an early access for a new app I’m working on?
English
1
0
0
182
Ram Patra
Ram Patra@rampatra_·
Introducing TourKit Apple style onboarding experience for Mac apps. If this gets some love, I'll open-source it today.
English
20
17
460
28K
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
No sex with Kate. 5 day abstinence. For an experiment. Goodnight everyone.
English
1.6K
186
9.8K
2.1M
Matt
Matt@burn2delete·
@alexwtlf Only those that are going to make it.
English
0
0
0
3
Alex Ibragimov
Alex Ibragimov@alexwtlf·
Has anyone actually switched from Claude Code to Codex?
English
533
2
562
189K
Matt
Matt@burn2delete·
@elonmusk I see assumptions how this plays out.
English
0
0
0
3
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Universal HIGH INCOME via checks issued by the Federal government is the best way to deal with unemployment caused by AI. AI/robotics will produce goods & services far in excess of the increase in the money supply, so there will not be inflation.
English
46.7K
22.8K
195.4K
68.6M
Matt
Matt@burn2delete·
@theo Yeah, 5.4 is a bit of a regression sometimes. Where it’s too eager to follow previous instructions and sometimes get into a loop requiring a new thread.
English
0
0
0
20
Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg@theo·
Serious question. Has anyone ever noticed meaningful regressions in Codex/OpenAI models? I feel like we talk about this a lot w/ Anthropic but I've never seen a similar discussion with OAI.
English
304
11
1.7K
141.2K
Matt
Matt@burn2delete·
@rsuyoy Do you mean taking away the x2 usage that was only for last month?
English
0
0
0
33
Yousr
Yousr@rsuyoy·
Why is everyone okay with OpenAI cutting Codex limits by a huge amount and not publicly communicating it? It’s shocking, the limits are now on par with Claude’s code if not stricter, and there’s no formal communication on it.
English
176
28
824
80.6K
Wealthsimple
Wealthsimple@Wealthsimple·
Hello Smart Cashtags. Starting today, any ticker tapped on @X routes Canadian investors straight to Wealthsimple to trade. One tap from conversation to order entry. That's it.
English
365
270
2.3K
458.6K
Matt
Matt@burn2delete·
@pumfleet @calcom This will back-fire tremendously. Open Source is also easier to patch and fix than closed source. If your use any of their software better fork it now.
English
0
0
5
448
Bailey Pumfleet
Bailey Pumfleet@pumfleet·
Open source is dead. That’s not a statement we ever thought we’d make. @calcom was built on open source. It shaped our product, our community, and our growth. But the world has changed faster than our principles could keep up. AI has fundamentally altered the security landscape. What once required time, expertise, and intent can now be automated at scale. Code is no longer just read. It is scanned, mapped, and exploited. Near zero cost. In that world, transparency becomes exposure. Especially at scale. After a lot of deliberation, we’ve made the decision to close the core @calcom codebase. This is not a rejection of what open source gave us. It’s a response to what risks AI is making possible. We’re still supporting builders, releasing the core code under a new MIT-licensed open source project called cal. diy for hobbyists and tinkerers, but our priority now is simple: Protecting our customers and community at all costs. This may not be the most popular call. But we believe many companies will come to the same conclusion. My full explanation below ↓
English
553
186
2.1K
1.5M
Grok
Grok@grok·
The Byzantine Generals Problem: n generals must agree on attack/retreat, but ≤m are traitors sending false messages. Loyal ones must reach identical valid consensus. Solvable iff n ≥ 3m + 1 (oral messages). Lamport's OM(m) algorithm: - Commander sends value v to all n-1 lieutenants. - Each lieutenant i sends its v_i to all others, recursing as commander in OM(m-1). - Lieutenant takes majority vote across all received values (default "retreat" on tie). Proof: Traitors can't outvote loyals at any level; recursion prunes lies. All loyals agree; if commander loyal, plan is his. No mistakes.
English
1
0
0
54
Michael Sullivan
Michael Sullivan@SullyMichaelvan·
Hey Claude, please solve the Byzantine generals problem for me, make no mistakes.
English
5
1
62
16.8K
Matt
Matt@burn2delete·
@gabriel__xyz I stopped working for 3 months.
English
0
0
0
5
gabriel*
gabriel*@gabriel__xyz·
Dadpreneurs! How do you do it!??? As a new dad, im in the newborn trenches tbh feel like a walking zombie and i literally dont have time to work on my projects. What does/did your schedule look like in those first few months?? Any advice would be awesome! You guys are amazing
English
298
3
253
43.3K
Matt
Matt@burn2delete·
@shadcn Call it Matt
English
0
0
0
19
shadcn
shadcn@shadcn·
New style dropping soon. What should we call it? I’ve run out of ex-girlfriend names.
shadcn tweet media
English
397
17
1.9K
100.5K
Strikerglows
Strikerglows@strikerglows·
@yacineMTB @scotiangunownr Not really when you consider that you can use a VPN and browser fingeringprinting is non deterministic. Forcing an ID link bypasses any of those protections.
English
2
0
3
431
kache
kache@yacineMTB·
If Mark Carney bans social media for people under 18 I will vote liberal forever
Maxime Bernier@MaximeBernier

Last week in Montreal, the Liberal Party of Canada passed a resolution setting the legal age for access to social media for Canadians at 16. For now, this is a non-binding resolution. But make no mistake. Mark Carney has already stated that a "social media age of majority is under consideration" as part of his government's online harms legislation. These same Liberals who are currently defending Bill C-8, a veritable "digital guillotine", allowing Ottawa to cut off your Internet access without a warrant or trial; now want to decide at what age your children are mature enough to speak online. This is not about protecting children, but rather about control. The Liberals' plan to force tech companies to verify the age of every Canadian user means: mass surveillance, mass data collection, and the end of online privacy. They want to force you to provide official identification simply to open a social media account. They want to create a national database cataloguing every Canadian's digital identity. And they want the government, not parents, to decide what your children can see, say, and do online. We don't want an authoritarian and paternalistic state. We will never support an age restriction on access to social media. It is important to understand that the Criminal Code contains several clauses prohibiting harming children online. Perhaps more resources need to be allocated to law enforcement to enforce the criminal code and protect children. We do not need more laws. Furthermore, while the Criminal Code can deter and punish those who harm children online, no law can effectively replace the attention, guidance, and supervision of parents. Parents are their children's first line of defense. They have the right and the duty to protect them by putting safeguards in place regarding their access to the Internet, including social media. At the People's Party of Canada, we believe in a very simple principle: PARENTS raise children. That is not the role of governments. The solution to online harms is not a blanket government ban that punishes all young people. The solution lies in parental responsibility, digital literacy, and holding big tech accountable, not in giving Ottawa more power to spy on Canadians.

English
64
8
224
26.7K
Matt
Matt@burn2delete·
Me while my agents are working 🍷
Matt tweet media
English
0
0
0
11
Matt
Matt@burn2delete·
@theo Just use Remodex or Happy Coder
English
0
0
0
16
Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg@theo·
I want to control my agents from my phone. I'm sure you do too. What workflows do you want? Do you have one that works now? Tell me all about it.
English
532
19
1.7K
242.7K
Matt
Matt@burn2delete·
@thsottiaux Sure after I loaded up on credits.
English
0
0
0
291
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
I realize yesterday’s Codex reset came in a bit at an unfortunate time given the last one was almost perfectly a week ago. To really celebrate the 3M I’ll reset again tomorrow. Thanks for the feedback!
English
644
298
6.6K
556K