پن کیا گیا ٹویٹ
David Beale
5.7K posts

David Beale
@dbeale12
𝘴𝘪𝘮𝘶𝘭 𝘫𝘶𝘴𝘵𝘶𝘴 𝘦𝘵 𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘰𝘳 · 1689 2LCF · Husband · Father · Pastor @CovGraceTN · Business development executive
Spring Hill, TN شامل ہوئے Şubat 2009
473 فالونگ647 فالوورز
David Beale ری ٹویٹ کیا

@Nerd_Sesh You’re obviously free to reject the historic biblical view on sexuality. But dismissing it as obvious bigotry is not thoughtful analysis. Isn’t it a bit arrogant to just wave away nearly all of human history as simply wrong until modern views became fashionable five minutes ago?
English
David Beale ری ٹویٹ کیا

“The moral law (written on the heart & the Ten Commandments; cf. 19.1–2) doth for ever bind all, as well justified persons as others, to the obedience thereof; and that not only in regard of the matter contained in it, but also in respect of the authority of God the Creator, who gave it; neither doth Christ in the Gospel any way dissolve, but much strengthen this obligation.”
— 1689 London Baptist Confession, Of the Law of God, 19.5
English
David Beale ری ٹویٹ کیا

When we say that the law does not motivate obedience but the gospel does, what we mean is that the gospel supplies us with proper motives that produce true obedience: gratitude for redemption, love for Christ, joy in Him, reverential and filial fear, etc. We do not mean that the gospel dulls the commanding authority of the law. The law’s commanding authority DIRECTS and even goads (Eccl 12:11) the believer who now has the right motives by faith in the gospel.
English

@JeffreyPerry09 The Grinch flicked the strap on the spoils, bound for his lair, and said with a grin, “That’s not going anywhere.”
English

I’ve seen a lot of talk about law/gospel distinction.
A faithful distinction is not:
Law bad, gospel good.
It is:
• The law exposes sin and condemns the sinner… the gospel justifies him
• The law reveals the good path to walk in… the gospel supplies Christ’s strength to walk it
Both are God’s servants. The Spirit uses both.
In the name of law/gospel distinction, some seem to advocate a law/gospel division.
May it not be so, brothers.
English

Affirmations and denials mean nothing without a clear recanting of confusing or false teaching.
Avoid teachers who affirm orthodox terms while quietly redefining them. They use “verbal coverings as hiding places for their errors.”
“To the extent that doctrinal ambiguity is tolerated or embraced, Christ’s sheep are imperiled and His glory is obscured.”
If you care about clarity and the purity of Christ’s church… read this.
This article offers “some profound insight into the nature and behavior of hypocrites and heretics who profess to believe Scripture, but in theology and works violently oppose it.”
fearlesspuritan.com/2025/09/05/a-l…
English
David Beale ری ٹویٹ کیا

I wrote "Even the Demons" to address claims like this by @Muddamalle: "Is it possible that there is room for more than one god in Christianity? You may be surprised at my answer – yes."
(Stranger Theology Substack, paywalled)
These statements greatly confuse Christ's sheep.
Drew Grumbles@pastorgrumbles
English
David Beale ری ٹویٹ کیا

@SaucepanChamp Glad to be addressed as a brother… though it usually carries more weight…
The irony of hearing it from someone who won’t show their name or face is its own kind of comedy.
English

@dbeale12 Brother, the irony of you saying this is unparalleled comedy.
Gold.
English

“Whenever I am in the cellar of affliction, I look for the Lord’s choicest wines.” —Samuel Rutherford
Brother and sister, don’t fear the cellar… it’s often the very place where Christ keeps the vintage of His deepest peace:
- Richer communion with Him
- Renewed resting in His righteousness as your own
- A heart humbled and shaped by His grace
- A sure hope in His covenant faithfulness
English








