Alberto R

@_Gabyraamirez Si, es exactamente lo que me aparece a mi también y estado revisando toda la semana so ntp Ya les mandé WhatsApp y me respondieron que empieza la venta libre el 13 de Julio por Ticketmaster

@guyonthebeach Ya me había asustado es que entré pero solo está para abono de juego de rayadas 🫩

Quiero comprar un abono para los juegos de rayados para esta temporada pero ya no sé cómo está el asunto con la compra o ya se acabaron ????

@TheJFreakinC Based the video, looks like they falsely yelled “gun” for the sole purpose of having an excuse to shoot the person Unbelievable

🚨BREAKING: Border Patrol agents violently pulled a U.S. citizen PASSENGER from a vehicle, slamming him to the ground… Then shouted that he had a gun, even though he didn’t. In Tucson, Arizona, state troopers pulled over a vehicle. While they were stopped on the side of the road, the state trooper called Border Patrol because the PASSENGER appeared to be Hispanic. When Border Patrol arrived, the situation immediately escalated to agents smashed both passenger-side windows. One agent tried to hit the phone out of the driver’s hand, who was recording, as they violently ripped the backseat passenger out of the vehicle, and threw him onto the ground, while multiple agents pin him down. Then, an agent ordered the driver out of the vehicle. She responded, “I didn’t do anything.” The agent replied, “Step out or you are going to get tackled.” At that point, at least three agents already had the passenger pinned, with his hands behind his back, when another agent suddenly yelled, “Gun!” A fourth agent responded, “He has a gun?” The driver immediately yells back, “NO! He has NO gun. WE HAVE NO WEAPONS!” The agent, closest to the car, was startled by this, appearing to forget the driver was still inside… and filming. That’s when he reached into the vehicle, grabbed her phone, threw it from her hand, and attempted to pull her out of the car. There is a lot going on in this video, so let’s break this down… First… you don’t get to detain people based on how they look. The Fourth Amendment requires individualized, reasonable suspicion. Not “he looked Hispanic.” Second… a passenger, during a traffic stop, is not automatically required to identify themselves, or hand over ID. Law enforcement needs a lawful basis… like reasonable suspicion that that specific person committed a crime… to demand identification. Third… even when someone is lawfully detained, they are only required to comply with lawful orders tied to THAT detention. A passenger doesn’t lose constitutional protections just because someone else was pulled over, while driving. Fourth… the First Amendment protects the right to record law enforcement, in public, while they’re doing their job. Knocking a phone away, or throwing it because someone is filming, is violating that constitutional right. And finally, any use of force… breaking windows, pulling someone out of a car, and restraining them… has to be objectively reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. That requires specific, articulable facts, not assumptions about identity. This wasn’t a checkpoint. It wasn’t a border stop. This was a traffic stop where a PASSENGER became the target because of how he looked. And if that’s enough to trigger federal agents breaking windows, and violently pulling U.S. citizens out of cars… then every single person should be demanding answers, and accountability. Because this could’ve ended with another U.S. citizen dead… And next time, that U.S. citizen could be you.

@CreatingGodfred @fifamedia @adidasfootball @FIFAWorldCup

@fifamedia @adidasfootball @FIFAWorldCup If the tech is that accurate why still send the ref to the screen? … Things don’t add up

According to the data provided by Connected Ball Technology housed within the @adidasfootball Trionda, the official match ball of the @FIFAWorldCup, it was proven that contact was made by Croatia's #20 Igor Matanović in the build up to the goal against Portugal, allowing the referee to correctly determine offside and disallow the goal.   IMU sensors housed within the Trionda ball are capable of determining any slight contact, displayed to viewers in the broadcast as a 'heartbeat graphic', and allowing officials an unprecedented level of data to make fast, accurate decisions.

@roboky303 Same in the spanish transmission @Telemundo Not a peep on the clear foul and penalty

How have the commentators just glossed over this stonewall pen that should’ve been given???

@heis_fede I thought it was called on the defender… idk why ppl are saying the GK

Why was Kane allowed to retake the penalty, the goalkeeper’s leg look to be on the line

@Rayados @peladoalmeyda Por fin una buena decisión!!! Ya se ve el cambio después de correr a esos directivos incompetentes 👏👏👏

𝑴𝒂𝒕𝒊́𝒂𝒔 𝑨𝒍𝒎𝒆𝒚𝒅𝒂 𝒆𝒔 𝑹𝒂𝒚𝒂𝒅𝒐.🔵⚪👊🏼

@Rayados Por fin una buena decisión!!! Ya se ve el cambio después de correr a esos directivos incompetentes 👏👏👏

Matías Almeyda es nuevo director técnico de los Rayados. 🇫🇮🔥 ¡Bienvenido al Monterrey, Profe! 👊🏼💙

@nwlust @PumasMX @AguilasAmerica_ Cuál credibilidad???

Lo que sucede con el partido @PumasMX @AguilasAmerica_ es un ejemplo más de que tanto es tantito, cómo normalizamos las faltas, los errores o hasta la trampa. No es “ganar en la mesa”. Es hacer valer el reglamento. Si hay alineación indebida, el partido está viciado. La responsabilidad no es de quien reclama, sino de quien incumple. “Que se defina en la cancha” aplica cuando ambos respetan las reglas. Si no, lo que está en juego no es el resultado… es la credibilidad de la liga.

@backingherdeal Esteban Andrada wouldn’t have allowed this to go unpunished

7 years ago today the biggest shithouse goal ever was scored

@JohnkGK @30DontFlop @FOXSoccer Exactly what you just stated “the defender choosing…” is not a reason to call offside since the rule was adjusted several years ago I’ve seen that not called countless times

@guyonthebeach @30DontFlop @FOXSoccer it's tough to tell from this angle how the attacker effects the defenders ability to play the ball. and the defender choosing to try to body block the attacker is a valid reason to call offside. but you are right it's about the attacker possibly interfering with the defender.

VAR disallows LAFC's second goal due to offsides ❌

@JohnkGK @30DontFlop @FOXSoccer The “clear and obvious” part is based on: did the attacker in offside position interfere with play? That’s why the ref went to the monitor. He made the wrong call because all I see is the defender going directly to clatter the attacker and the ball was way beyond his reach

@30DontFlop @FOXSoccer afaik MLS is the only league/comp in the world where the ROTC say that offside has to be clear and obvious. I do not know if Concacaf/CCC has that same provision in the ROTC. by the LOTG offside is not subject to the clear and obvious purview of VAR as there is 0 grey area.

@FOXSoccer Poor decision by the ref. I’ve seen this not called offsides many times since the rule change years ago

@le_pzer @rxckydusa As long as the new evo doesn’t change the cosmetic part of it… is my understanding

@rxckydusa I wanna know something , if i put this evo on a 79 player and after that i do another evo. , he keep 3 chem or not ?

So this Time Warp cosmetic EVO gives every player 3 Chem right? This is nice ngl and its available for 13 days 👀

@rjohnston4 @herculezg Exactly what I saw too. He only catches his leg because of how weird the play is and completely accidental. It can be clearly be seen in the replay how he even has his face looking away during the accidental contact

@herculezg Bent leg without a ton of force low to the ground - if that’s on a foot it’s clearly just a yellow. That it’s his thigh on the ground sucks for the recipient, but I’m not sure this is a stone cold red. He did get a yellow, right?

I can’t believe I’m about to tweet this, but Club America is getting screwed by the refs. This is one of at least two possible red cards vs Rayados. Criminal tackle by Tecatitto on Fidalgo.

@BengalsMike @RaiderAntonioJ @AlexiLalas You forgot to mention the countless ads and promoted results that are of no use… oh and a flight to South America

@RaiderAntonioJ @AlexiLalas You try finding anything there lately? First thing you get is AI telling you something you didn't ask for, then you scroll down and you get more things other people asked for but not what you asked for and then it's buried under more variations but still not what you asked for

Don’t care. Never heard anyone say, “Those South American teams are really ruining the World Cup.”

@TUTU_RICE @USMNT I think Poch didn’t like how Musah turned down the Gold Cup and I kind of agree with him

@USMNT Timmy Tillman over Musah is criminal.

TEAM NEWS: Timmy Tillman has been added to the November camp roster. Tyler Adams and Sean Zawadzki have been withdrawn due to injury.

@MarkGreene4 @USMNT He blew off the Gold Cup call up and I think that’s why Poch has him scratched out

@USMNT What a waste! I understand that Musah isn’t getting many minutes at Atalanta. But he has chemistry with our top players, World Cup experience and more quality than most of this roster. This would be the PERFECT window to bring him in. If he doesn’t perform, write him off.

@fer_tecnikero Pero como saben que precio poner si todavía no se sabe en qué estadio jugarán? 🤔 Parece que simplemente ponen casi lo más caro dentro Cat 3 vdd?

Las entradas Cat3 para los partidos de fase de grupos de Ecuador están a 260 y 255 dólares. Ese precio es el triple de lo que costaron para el mundial de Qatar! Va a estar cariñoso este mundial.

@BarryAnderson_ Thanks for posting the detailed prices

Horrific World Cup 2026 ticket prices from FIFA. Cat 4 tickets are as rare as hen's teeth, so most seats cost $140 (£104) to $640 (£475). Some prices are over £1000. Semi-final tickets $420 (£312) to $2780 (£2063). Final tickets $2030 (£1506) to $6730 (£4994).