mousepotato
2.5K posts

mousepotato
@iluciddreaming
🇺🇸 硅谷打工人|AI 产品|独立开发|技术管理 👨🏻💻 写代码,也写产品、增长和团队管理 🧠 从程序员转型产品型创作者的路上 🚀 Build | Ship | Grow

What’s the real scarcity in the AI era? @karpathy talked about the arrival of “Software 3.0,” at @sequoia AI Ascent 2026. This is a world where we no longer write every line of code ourselves, but increasingly describe what we want and let AI agents help us build. He also said something that kept me thinking - “You can outsource your thinking to AI, but you cannot outsource your understanding.” Spot on. Because capability is not the same as understanding. AI can generate, calculate, summarize, write, code, design, and reason at a speed that already feels superhuman. As “machines of loving grace” become more intelligent, more capable, and more embedded in our lives, the question becomes more existential: What is left for humans? What is the part of us that cannot be automated away? Maybe the answer is not one thing - it is the whole human layer behind the prompt. The taste to know what is beautiful. The judgment to know what is right. The empathy to know what another person actually needs. The lived experience to understand why something matters. The trust that has to be earned between people, communities, and systems. And perhaps most importantly, the ability to give direction. AI can help us produce almost anything. But humans still have to decide what is worth producing. That is the real “human spec.” Not just intelligence, but understanding. Not just output, but meaning. Not just optimization, but care. The AI era may not make humans less important. It may force us to become more deeply human - that would be ideal. What are your thoughts? 😉 #AIAscent #Software3 #AI #HumanCenteredAI #AIAscent #AI #HumanCenteredAI #Software3








There will be no AI jobpocalypse. The story that AI will lead to massive unemployment is stoking unnecessary fear. AI — like any other technology — does affect jobs, but telling overblown stories of large-scale unemployment is irresponsible and damaging. Let’s put a stop to it. I’ve expressed skepticism about the jobpocalypse in previous posts. I’m glad to see that the popular press is now pushing back on this narrative. The image below features some recent headlines. Software engineering is the sector most affected by AI tools, as coding agents race ahead. Yet hiring of software engineers remains strong! So while there are examples of AI taking away jobs, the trends strongly suggest the net job creation is vastly greater than the job destruction — just like earlier waves of technology. Further, despite all the exciting progress in AI, the U.S. unemployment rate remains a healthy 4.3%. Why is the AI jobpocalypse narrative so popular? For one thing, frontier AI labs have a strong incentive to tell stories that make AI technology sound more powerful. At their most extreme, they promote science-fiction scenarios of AI “taking over” and causing human extinction. If a technology can replace many employees, surely that technology must be very valuable! Also, a lot of SaaS software companies charge around $100-$1000 per user/year. But if an AI company can replace an employee who makes $100,000 — or make them 50% more productive — then charging even $10,000 starts to look reasonable. By anchoring not to typical SaaS prices but to salaries of employees, AI companies can charge a lot more. Additionally, businesses have a strong incentive to talk about layoffs as if they were caused by AI. After all, talking about how they’re using AI to be far more productive with fewer staff makes them look smart. This is a better message than admitting they overhired during the pandemic when capital was abundant due to low interest rates and a massive government financial stimulus. To be clear, I recognize that AI is causing a lot of people’s work to change. This is hard. This is stressful. (And to some, it can be fun.) I empathize with everyone affected. At the same time, this is very different from predicting a collapse of the job market. Societies are capable of telling themselves stories for years that have little basis in reality and lead to poor society-wide decision making. For example, fears over nuclear plant safety led to under-investment in nuclear power. Fears of the “population bomb” in the 1960s led countries to implement harsh policies to reduce their populations. And worries about dietary fat led governments to promote unhealthy high-sugar diets for decades. Now that mainstream media is openly skeptical about the jobpocalypse, I hope these stories will start to lose their teeth (much like fears of AI-driven human extinction have). Contrary to the predictions of an AI jobpocalypse, I predict the opposite: There will be an AI jobapalooza! AI will lead to a lot more good AI engineering jobs, and I’m also optimistic about the future of the overall job market. What AI engineers do will be different from traditional software engineering, and many of these jobs will be in businesses other than traditional large employers of developers. In non-AI roles, too, the skills needed will change because of AI. That makes this a good time to encourage more people to become proficient in AI, and make sure they’re ready for the different but plentiful jobs of the future! [Original text in The Batch newsletter.]













