@vaxryy Nice.
Just a Lil tip in case you didn't know before, you can auto generate the required keys with ssh-keygen -K, no need to copy the keyfile stub everywhere.
English
Eugene Von Furstenberg
41 posts
Eugene Von Furstenberg
@iusevimBTWW
Crypto investor💸 Manage a fleet of agents thanks to GStack🤖 100% all organic human slop
India شامل ہوئے Şubat 2024
4 فالونگ1 فالوورز
@daniel_nguyenx If you want your app to look like a website, might as well just use the reference renderer aka chromium.
Tauri just kinda seems like a worse of both worlds, if you want something truly lightweight you have to leave JS entirely onto something like QT.
English
It’s interesting that a few teams moved from tauri back to electron.
Genuinely curious, why? I thought tauri was supposed to be the better alternative? 🤔
brendan@brendonovich
we've moved opencode desktop to electron. it's faster, more reliable, and will replace our tauri build soon. try it out in beta via the link below.
English
@mweinbach Ah yes, Mac minis are so essential for the latest and greatest in AI, such as openclaw.
English
If you don’t have a Mac and are trying to keep up with cutting edge AI, you literally can’t.
Everything is Mac only or Mac first.
This is a huge deal. Leading AI products are essentially built for Mac, with everything else being an afterthought.
This is significant
English
@spinelessaisha If they fit your requirements and aren't too limited, PWAs have maximum portability, extremely easy to distribute (don't even need an app store), and are well abstracted by being part of the browser.
English
@yoemsri @burkeholland "Worst version of these tools that will ever exist"
Idk about that one chief, they seem to be speed running end vitrification not even a few years in.
English
@burkeholland The math already doesn’t work in labor’s favor for most tasks and we are still in the worst version of these tools that will ever exist. Give it 2 years.
English
It would be hilarious if we go through this whole AI thing just to find out that it’s ultimately cheaper to pay humans to do it
English
@XLibreDev Sad to see it go this way.
Fortunately the gentoo wiki article is still up. We should give that one a bit more love. I've found myself using gentoo wiki more than arch wiki sometimes, it's more handholdish which I appreciate.
English
The #XLibre page on the #ArchLinux Wiki was deleted yesterday by the wiki administrator Alad.
The page was created about a month ago and was edited by some users, sharing technical information about XLibre.
Please see the threaded second post for links to facts and discussions.
English
@sickdotdev Java gets way too much hate as a language.
Python doesn't get enough.
English
@tgor23 @HSVSphere 4 commands that do the same thing? Just git add and git commit. Or use the editor features if you want to go hunk by hunk.
Having a VCS that only does what you tell it to is objectively simpler than whatever splitting an ethereal commit fuckery JJ has.
English
@iusevimBTWW @HSVSphere i don’t care how some other moron on google feels about it ?? literally everything you do with the index you can just do with a commit in jj and then u don’t have like 4 commands that do the same thing bc they need to address this worthless distinction. It’s objectively simpler
English
Git is just bad. Use jj, and stop complaining about concepts when the implementation is bad.
:3@Colonthreee
Version control like "git" is just creating more work for everyone involved. There is no reason for this to be so complicated, convoluted, opaque, and behaving like it knows best. It should not require the user to know a billion commands and "tricks" to use. It's unscalable.
English
@tgor23 @HSVSphere Its literally so simple. Shove changes into the index, and whatever is in there is in the next commit. So simple.
The first search result for JJ split for me is how the ux is terrible to use.
How the fuck is this an improvement over git?
English
@iusevimBTWW @HSVSphere the index is worthless dogshit compared to jj split / squash
English
@droidbuilds Right now codex, it changes every few weeks.
English
@chribjel I think the opencode team are chill people and have no doubt they're doing their best.
Unfortunately, models keep getting lobotomized, I just can't trust "we don't quantize" anymore. One of their providers must be lying. All the people saying Claude opus got dumber were RIGHT.
English
the opencode go plan might have attracted the worst possible type of customers
pays almost nothing, demands pretty much everything
my condolences to the opencode team
English
@YosarianTwo I agree with the whole it only matters what the CEO thinks thing, but also:
Notice how software quality has kept going down? Software as a field no longer rewards quality, it rewards speed. Vibe coded slop can get you into YC.
That's why LLMs hit software so hard.
English
"AI is not ever going to be intelligent or a threat to us, it's a glorified chatbot, but it's going to steal all our jobs" is a weirdly common opinion. Do people think it's likely LLM's can do so many jobs they cause mass unemployment without being a general intelligence?
ThatOneGuy006@That_One_Guy006
@YosarianTwo They aren't retaliating because of some imagined apocalypse scenario with your glorified speak and spell, they're attacking because you want them to starve.
English
@ThePrimeagen I've gone through a similar thing, slowly coming around to it, and I completely agree you can't break 20% improvement without slopifying.
English
Its crazy how many people think slowly changing your mind and testing your theories is bad or makes you dumb.
ThePrimeagen@ThePrimeagen
I am slowly coming around to AI assisted programming. I am genuinely trying to codify every rule about programming that I have and using that + several stages to build out small changes. Not sure the productivity changes, but I think I can see a modest gain in speed. I am also trying to be concerned about every line produced, not just slop trebucheting code over the wall.
English
@usr_bin_roygbiv @samswoora Your mom fell down stairs holding you when you were a toddler
English
There’s no explaining why AI is good when someone loses their livelihood forever. People will love AI when cancer cures start coming but that’s years away even if we reform the FDA.
This isn’t a messaging problem, normies aren’t stupid - they see what the labs are doing
Joshua Achiam@jachiam0
The AI industry has largely failed to foresee the extremely foreseeable: most normal people think AI is scary because we had decades of science fiction about how scary AI is. We owe the public clear explanations of why we think this can be good and how to make it so.
English
@RaviTejaKNTS @Prathkum They are:
Integrating Gemini into their wider ecosystem.
Applying transformer architecture outside of language (like alphafold)
Releasing smaller LLMs that pack a punch
Creating custom hardware for ai use.
Winning the war, not the battle.
English
@iusevimBTWW @Prathkum So basically they are losing in this? This post is about AI. How come they are amazing in other things is a valid answer?
English
