Pedro Ferreira

266 posts

Pedro Ferreira

Pedro Ferreira

@pfalef

PhD in Computational Biology @cbg_ethz

Basel, Switzerland شامل ہوئے Eylül 2018
1K فالونگ199 فالوورز
Pedro Ferreira
Pedro Ferreira@pfalef·
@RoryStewartUK Thoroughly enjoying it so far. Fascinating account of the clash between the love for what politics can be and the desperation over what it has become... Thanks for writing it!
English
1
0
0
238
Rory Stewart
Rory Stewart@RoryStewartUK·
Huge thank you to everyone who is continuing to read and buy #PoliticsOnTheEdge - can’t quite believe it 🙏
Rory Stewart tweet media
English
57
12
411
107.8K
Pedro Ferreira ری ٹویٹ کیا
Rainer Melzer
Rainer Melzer@UCDflowerpower·
GWAS for Nobel prize laureates.
Rainer Melzer tweet media
English
18
345
1.9K
190.8K
Pedro Ferreira ری ٹویٹ کیا
OLISSIPO Fostering Computational Biology Research
This week all members were together in Basel, @ETH_en, for the final meeting of this amazing project. That's a wrap of these 3,5 years of training, exchanging, sharing & collaborating! Thanks to all the students, researchers and research administrators who have crossed our path!
OLISSIPO Fostering Computational Biology Research tweet media
English
0
1
9
659
Pedro Ferreira ری ٹویٹ کیا
NimwegenLab
NimwegenLab@NimwegenLab·
Sigh. The level of profound confusion in the scRNA-seq analysis field keeps surprising me. I've now run into people that, in a discussion about technical artifacts of scRNA-seq, where I claimed there is no evidence for zero inflation, first insist that it does exist, and then 1/n
𝕐@nomad421

@NimwegenLab @maelouisewoods @GorinGennady @arjunrajlab The existence of ZI as a "technical artifact" is distinct from divergence from a NB or Poisson dist. This paper genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11… e.g. argues that zero inflation is observed for certain genes & is of Biological origin (& recommends still using a GLM with NB counts w/o ZI).

English
2
12
91
62.2K
Pedro Ferreira ری ٹویٹ کیا
Lior Pachter
Lior Pachter@lpachter·
The choice of whether to use Seurat or Scanpy for single-cell RNA-seq analysis typically comes down to a preference of R vs. Python. But do they produce the same results? In biorxiv.org/content/10.110… w/ @Josephmrich et al. we take a close look. The results are 👀 1/🧵
Lior Pachter tweet media
English
15
366
1.2K
586.5K
Pedro Ferreira ری ٹویٹ کیا
NimwegenLab
NimwegenLab@NimwegenLab·
I see we are getting to the stage of the discussion where people are starting to defend UMAP saying it can 'reveal patterns' or 'structure' in the data. Without ever specifying what precisely these patterns/structures represent. This is not surprising because hardly anybody 1/n
Daniel MacArthur@dgmacarthur

Thoughtful, well-informed counterpoint on the use of UMAP for visualising human genetic data, following the intense debate about the All Of Us paper this week.

English
3
116
505
272.9K
Pedro Ferreira ری ٹویٹ کیا
Jay Shendure
Jay Shendure@JShendure·
Our latest out today in @Nature. We profiled 12 million single cells from mouse embryos spanning gastrulation to birth, defined cell type tree from zygote to birth, and unexpectedly found crazy fast changes within first hour of extrauterine life. OA PDF: rdcu.be/dyDAg
Jay Shendure@JShendure

Excited to share our lab's latest preprint, led by @CXchengxiangQIU, @bethkarenmartin & Ian Welsh of @jacksonlab. We set out to build a single cell roadmap for all of mouse prenatal development, from single cell zygote to free-living pup. Preprint: tinyurl.com/2nhe4mm9 1/n

English
15
152
576
90.1K
Lior Pachter
Lior Pachter@lpachter·
An interesting approach to hierarchical cell type annotation for single-cell RNA-seq using a multi-level Bayesian factorization model. #xref-ref-33-1" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
English
1
20
132
20.3K
Pedro Ferreira ری ٹویٹ کیا
NimwegenLab
NimwegenLab@NimwegenLab·
I really dislike this race to the bottom: No need to write protocols. No need to write your own introduction section. Just copy somebody else's. Everything is too much apparently. There are many reasons why being forced to formulate a protocol each time is helpful. 1. It 1/n
Arjun Raj@arjunrajlab

The arguments presented here against reuse of language in methods section are unconvincing. Yes, it is certainly possible to rewrite a protocol over and over again. Is that a valuable exercise in scientific writing ala Flaubert? No way. We're not writing Madame Bovary here.

English
2
4
21
23.4K
Pedro Ferreira ری ٹویٹ کیا
Arthur Dondi
Arthur Dondi@ArthurDondi·
Delighted to present our full-length scRNA-seq study on ovarian cancer patients, in collaboration with the University Hospital Basel @labfranz ! nature.com/articles/s4146… Can we simultaneously detect isoform-level gene expression, mutations and gene fusions in cancer cells? 1/
English
3
12
39
8.6K
Pedro Ferreira ری ٹویٹ کیا
CBG, ETH Zurich
CBG, ETH Zurich@cbg_ethz·
In our detection of BA.2.86 in two wastewater samples from Laupen (BE, Switzerland) of August 5 and 6: we observed co-occurrence of these mutations on the same fragments: – 21618: T, 21622: T, 21624: C, 21633: '---------', 21711: T, 21765: '------' (amplicon 67)
English
2
19
60
11.7K
Pedro Ferreira ری ٹویٹ کیا
NEXUS
NEXUS@NEXUS_PHT·
The next Computational Reproducibility seminar is this Wednesday at 5 pm: Kim Philipp Jablonski @kpj_py at @Google is going to speak about sustainable tool benchmarking and workflow development in Computational Biology. -- Join us for free at: ethz.zoom.us/j/65832714361 @SwissRN
English
0
3
2
356
Pedro Ferreira ری ٹویٹ کیا
CRUK Cambridge Institute
CRUK Cambridge Institute@CRUK_CI·
We are pleased to welcome Prof Niko Beerenwinkel of @cbg_ethz. He joins the Institute as a @royalsociety Wolfson Visiting Fellow. He will work with @markowetzlab over the next two years to develop his research project "Single-cell copy number signatures as cancer #biomarkers".
CRUK Cambridge Institute tweet media
English
0
1
11
3K