Andy Hutton

@IfindRetards You could of said this nice.

If you're a grammar Nazi on social media, your retarded.

@SenWarren You don't need to steal Bezos' wealth to fund those things. So, get to work.

Jeff Bezos has $222 billion. If he paid my wealth tax this year, we could fund insulin in America for everyone who needs it plus free school lunch for every kid in Texas—and have plenty of money left over. And Bezos would still have $215 billion dollars to spare.

@toxiccowboy1 If it has Mr. Fusion and the flying apparatus, the Delorean. Otherwise, KITT.

I'm thinking starsky and hutch.

@WallStreetMav The leftist Hollywood version will be "The Tragedy of the Lost Cargo Planes."

They are definitely going to make a movie on this rescue. American ejects over Iran and spends 2 days hiding while the Iranian militia are hunting for him. The US Air Force and Navy provide air cover for him around the clock, blasting anything that approaches him. US Special Ops arrives in the area, but their planes get damaged or stuck. We blew up the planes so they cannot be recovered. Send in more aircraft, grab everyone, get out alive.

@zundamotisuki Because they want power and will align themselves with even the most awful regimes to get it.

なんで日本の左翼って欧米諸国は嫌いなのに、中国や北朝鮮とは仲良くしたがるの？ おかしくない？

@Jendrak777 @notEvileconboy @alexboge Quite right.

@AndrewHutton @notEvileconboy @alexboge You can't argue w ppl who need to be spoon fed everything w low IQ + ADHD They've never sat & contemplated concepts they have no knowledge of & then educated themselves on the topic because they have no interest in the truth & "they lie to us about everything" It's exhausting

From the very same people who demanded to see stars in photos… now come complaints about the photo that shows these stars. 🙄 Let’s walk through what you’re actually looking at. These two images were taken less than a minute apart from Orion during Artemis II, using a Nikon D5 with a 14–24mm f/2.8 lens. The EXIF data is publicly available. This is not speculation. The image on the left is essentially what the scene looks like to the eye. The image on the right uses the full capability of a modern sensor, with higher ISO, longer exposure, and a wider aperture to pull in far more light. That is why you can clearly see the stars. (ISO basically is simply the camera’s sensitivity to light.) Nothing was added. Nothing was “photoshopped.” These are two direct captures showing what happens when you change settings with a capable camera. Now here’s why this matters. For decades, one of the loudest talking points from Moon landing deniers has been: “Where are the stars in the Apollo photos?” Apollo did not use modern digital cameras. They used modified Hasselblad film cameras with low-ISO film, about ASA 64 for color and ASA 80 for black and white, chosen specifically for photographing bright, sunlit lunar surfaces. That choice was intentional. Those cameras were designed to be simple, reliable, and usable with gloved hands. Limited settings. Low light sensitivity (ISO). Built and setup for the lighting conditions they knew they would encounter. And that comes with a tradeoff. When you expose correctly for a bright foreground, faint stars do not register. There was no practical way, with that equipment, to capture both a properly exposed lunar scene and faint background stars in the same shot. What these Artemis II Orion images demonstrate, very clearly, is exactly that principle, using a modern DSLR camera. One setting → no stars Another setting → stars appear Same place. Same moment. Same reality. The only thing that changed was the camera settings. And now that the answer is literally being shown to them, the question somehow remains, because like all zombie conspiracies, the goal is not understanding and seeking the truth, it is keeping the dead conspiracy alive.

@notEvileconboy @alexboge Your eyes adjust to the environment you're in. Inside of capsule = light, outside = very dark. Next time you're on a night flight, look out the window and see how many stars you see. All of your "critical thinking" does not, apparently, include critiquing your own ideas.

@AndrewHutton @alexboge Your eyes adjust in seconds. Besides, they never even tried to take a photograph on the dark side towards deep space. None of it makes sense to anyone with the tiniest bit of critical thinking.

@RockChartrand Your right to a material thing is an anti-right to those who must provide it.

Housing isn’t a human right. A right can’t require forcing someone else to provide it. Calling housing a “right” means someone must be compelled to build, maintain, or pay for it. That’s not a right, that’s a claim on other people. Eviction isn’t violence. It’s the enforcement of property rights after an agreement is broken. The pattern is consistent: What’s labeled a “right” on the left is often just an entitlement that shifts responsibility from the individual to someone else. Real rights protect your freedom to act. They don’t guarantee outcomes at someone else’s expense.

@notEvileconboy @alexboge And if you're sitting inside an illuminated capsule, the pupils of your eyes are not wide open, so you're not going to see faint stars.

@AndrewHutton @alexboge There's no atmosphere in space. There's zero light pollution behind the terminator of the Moon. Langley's gaslighting isn't needed or wanted right now.

@catturd2 When the new arrivals assimilate, it is immigration. When the natives do, it is conquest.

Conquered.

@notEvileconboy @alexboge Sit inside your well-lit house and look out the window at night and see how many stars you see.

@alexboge "I don't recall seeing any stars at all." -Michael Collins

@LeeHurstComic Fish of Rock

This is class. 😁⬇️

@redsteeze Probably meant to say Aurora *Australis*.

Aurora Borealis? At this time of year? At this time of day? In this part of the country?

@KayrusFenix @PopTopNow @grok is the picture of Earth from the Artemis II mission real?

@PopTopNow E a imagem da Terra pela Artemis II é real ?

Na tal "foto" da Terra divulgada pela NASA pela missão artemis II, por quê não se ver nenhum satélite já que são dezenas de milhares em órbita?

@KayrusFenix Is this a joke? Why don't you ask why you can't see any of the billions of people on the Earth?

@kyuumaruTK Your destroyer is playing dress-up as a light aircraft carrier. Nonetheless, respect!

親愛なるアメリカの友人たちは我が海上自衛隊のこの駆逐艦をどう思いますか？ いいだろ？

@KamalaHarris @grok Does Trump's executive order ban vote by mail?

Donald Trump votes by mail. But this week, he signed an Executive Order so you can’t. Why? Because he is scared of your power, and he is scared of losing the midterms.

Anti Tank mayını Rus T 90 tankını zerrelerine kadar ayırıyor.

@IGADON2 I guess, but it's diminishing returns with Predator sequels. Though I enjoyed the recent Predator: Badlands well enough.

エイリアン1.2 ターミネーター1.2 プレデター1 ここまできたらプレデター2見るしかないよなあ！

@RightWingDad Childish joke: "What did Spock find in Kirk's toilet?"

Shitters full