Big Wave Advisors

You know the farther America distances itself from France the way better off we are. They offer nothing but weak leadership, gutless ass kissing to their enemies and zero backbone to the world. We saved them 80 years ago and it’s time to let them ride it out on their own. If their leaders want to break it off, so be it.

BREAKING: 🇫🇷🇺🇸 Macron has given BIG SHOCK to Trump. Macron sold 129 tonnes of French gold held in New York and replaced it with European reserves, generating around €13 billion in profits. France now holds all its gold in Paris, signaling a major shift in its strategy. Source: Europa

@pmarca lol…from an 85 year old man….i think I saw this same headline newspaper in 1907, “ the automobile is a threat to everything Americans hold dear” , no maybe it was in 1903..” the airplane is a threat to everything Americans hold dear” Just get out of the way old man.

Top doomer.

@lady_valor_07 Never listened to it in the first place so I’m good. Thanks.

Singer P!nk calls MAGA an “insult to humanity” and says, “If you’re a Trump supporter, then don’t listen to my music.” What is your Response to her ??

@habakukkk @AndreasSteno That’s why the dollar is in short supply. Every country wants to price their bonds in dollars because they need dollars to pay the interest on all their bonds. Like I said , only thing I can imagine to replace the dollar is bitcoin. Non government, non central bank

@BigWaveFlash @AndreasSteno Agree. Europe needs to figure out how to keep Russia in check (not too difficult) and what its relationship with China is going to be(come). The US must figure out how its future will look without the ability to project power globally and without the world's reserve currency.

We are watching the complete meltdown of the EU / US relationship in real time currently

Only way dollar loses reserve currency is if bitcoin replaces it. What other country would replace it. Look at the credit default swaps on any other foreign country and you’ll see there is only one country whose economic strength is trusted and that’s America….period. If the dollar loses reserve currency, interest rates in every single country would skyrocket because all of the global debt would have to be repriced in their own currency. Mexico, for example repriced in pesos without dollar backing would see rates jump to over 20%. Won’t happen, believe me

Wrong. Us net worth is roughly 180 trillion dollars. Add gdp at 45 trillion and our total debt is 39 trillion. Foreigners own only 9.2 trillion or about 24%. Japan, one of our more friendly ally owns the most, 1.2 trillion, UK is second at 800 billion and China owns 759 billion. That is a spit in the ocean. Get your facts straight before you post. It wouldn’t matter to us at all

@BigWaveFlash @AndreasSteno Who is going to keep buying massive amounts of US debt if that relationship collapses? The US needs the world more than it cares to admit

And that’s fine. We already won the Cold War with Soviet Russia on our own in the 80s China, whose economy will fail within 2 years, will be burdened with so much debt and a failing economy, who knows what’s going to happen to them and any country who is dependent on China will fail. The US will never fail , it’s not in our DNA.

@habakukkk @BigWaveFlash @AndreasSteno The final nail in the coffin with our relationship with the US will be our partnership/alliance with China. We all know its coming. It's inevitable at this point. That will permanently close the door to the US. Even if this regine falls, it wont open.

No, the opposite, that will be the nail in the coffin for China. EU is the huge liability here. They will never get their shit together and will be the ball and chain around the neck of China. If anything, China will call 100% of the shots and EU will become chinas lapdog. Zero….and I mean ZERO leadership in any EU country and worse in UK .

@hypefabrik @BigWaveFlash @AndreasSteno Its not gonna be because of immigration. The EU is going to ally with China. We dont have a choice anymore. The EU has dug us into a hole where that is the only option. Thats gonna be tha nail in the coffin for the US.

@AndreasSteno @DivsAndChill So in the “ divorce” does the fact that USA and Russia get closer makes things far more messy with the breakup.

@DivsAndChill @BigWaveFlash The Europe doens’t buy anything by now - the Russian economy was in ruins until Trump saved it with the Iran war. Russia is by far the biggest winner of what is going on

@AndreasSteno @DivsAndChill Good point

What’s with everyone suddenly using the word “retarded”? That word is as disgusting as the “n” word in describing people in a derogatory way. It also shows a sense of how you think and it means you are near the bottom. I’ve noticed more and more posts using that description. Man, things really are taking a turn for the worst. FOURTH TURNING

@BigWaveFlash @AndreasSteno Haha American retards will have epic problems when everyone sells your Treasuries and repatriates their capital. Bye bye petrodollar, bitch. Have fun doing anything with 80% retarded obese ppl 😂

Now, that the divorce is recognized, the assets need to be dividend. EU can keep NATO and UN, USA will give those two up. Etc, etc, etc. that is going to be the interesting part and one of the most will be how China And Russia pick sides in this. If USA leaves NATO, the Russian problem in euro zone goes unchecked. And China will move in to influence the eurozone as well. Problem is both Russia and China have big time severe economic problems so for a while Eurozone must go it alone with help from no one important while the details of the divorce are getting settled.

@BigWaveFlash I mostly agree with that take actually

@OlenaRohoza What a fool. Look at those countries. Most with huge immigration problems spending huge amounts on that. This guy LOST his election and wouldn’t quit

Emmanuel Macron: “If you bomb countries because you disagree with their regime, it opens a Pandora’s box. Iran is a bad regime, but bombing doesn’t work. Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya — 20 years of interventions have produced no results. Change must come from within, from the people. We do not want to depend on China’s dominance or be overly vulnerable to the unpredictability of the United States. France does not want to be a vassal of any power. There is a ‘third path’ — uniting Korea, Europe, Canada, Japan, India, Brazil, and Australia. It’s a format for countries that do not want to depend on China or automatically side with the U.S. France is facing growing risks due to Russia’s war against Ukraine. China is trying to control supply chains and critical minerals. The United States is reshaping trade through tariffs and extraterritorial measures.”

Those 3 countries are nothing. Nobody really needs them. They do not influence anything in the world. The wealthiest countries control the world and those 3 are nothing in that group. They have weak economies they have weak defense and 2 of the 3 have massive immigration problems. They are spending slot if money on that problem alone.

Is the balance of global economic power beginning to shift? Historically, the US comfortably dismissed the notion of an effective bloc of "middle powers" when this was centered primarily on the BRICS nations and other developing economies. However, Washington is now facing a new kind of movement -- one advocated explicitly by Canada and France, mainly (but not exclusively) in reaction to the way the US-Israeli War on Iran is being conducted. The UK is increasingly being pulled into this movement. Whether this will gain significant traction remains to be seen. Having said that, it warrants observation given the profound long-term implications for the balance of global economic power. #economy #middlepowers #markets

@ajsteelshow Look at their countries per population growth. For sure they are with Iran. The Muslim population in their countries vote for them. It’s why they are in power. power

We Americans are surprised & deeply disappointed because so many of our European "allies" whom we saved from the Nazis and the Communists, won't lift a finger to help in the war against Islamic Iran. But has it occurred to any of us that they may actually be on the side of Iran?

@seihunijinmonno @AFpost That’s exactly what it is.

@AFpost For a person in charge of national defense to introduce the logic of a "religious holy war" is an extremely dangerous ideology that could drag the world into a catastrophic final war (Armageddon).#Hegseth #terrorist

War Secretary Pete Hegseth has removed Gen. David Hodne from command, making him one of three senior Army officers dismissed in the latest Pentagon shake-up. Follow: @AFpost

@Eruja1 @AFpost So, that is a huge accusation . Do you have proof he is mentally unstable from a health report you saw? That would be huge. Show us the proof that he is mentally unstable.

@AFpost Pete Hegseth is mentally unstable, this nothing but a total meltdown 🫠

@AndreasSteno @EthanLevins2 So do you know this for a fact. His 75 IQ? Where did you see this. Cause this is huge if that is true. A guy that dumb running defense. That could set the stage for his dismissal. Put up your sources so you can nail this guy as a fraud.

@EthanLevins2 When you give an 75 IQ guy such a big mandate..

More and more being fired! They keep coming! What the hell is happening???

Yea I agree right now. The infrastructure needs to stay intact even as demand starts to go the other way. It’s not going away. I just think sooner vs later the usage in this country will resemble usage today between gas powered cars and electric. Still, way more gas powered than electric. Right now it’s 72% gas, 27% eke trip. Last year it was 75% gas, 25 % electric and the year before it was 80% gas 20% electric. So percentages changing about 2% a year in favor of electric. As electric car costs head lower, we could see 50/50;by let’s say in 6-8 years. That’s a big hit for gasoline trainers etc, So I agree, there will still be half the cars needing oil so infrastructure needs to stay intact

@BigWaveFlash @arnimh @DrJStrategy And there will be demand to match that energy. We are nowhere near having a surplus or more than we know what to do with. The oil infrastructure worth trillions is not going anywhere

Food for thought. Trump, Hormuz and the End of the Free Ride For half a century, Western strategists have known that the Strait of Hormuz is the acute point where energy, sea power and political will intersect. That knowledge is not in dispute. What is new in this war with Iran is that the United States, under Donald Trump, has chosen not to rush to “solve” the problem. In Hegelian terms, he is refusing an easy synthesis in order to force the underlying contradiction to the surface. The old thesis was simple: the US guarantees open sea lanes in the Gulf, and everyone else structures their economies and politics around that free insurance. Europe and the UK embraced ambitious green policies, ran down hard‑power capabilities and lectured Washington on multilateral virtue, secure in the assumption that American carriers would always appear off Hormuz. The political class behaved as if the American security guarantee were a law of nature, not a contingent choice. Their conduct today is closer to Chamberlain than Churchill: temporising, issuing statements, hoping the storm will pass without a fundamental reordering of their responsibilities. Trump’s antithesis is to withhold the automatic guarantee at the moment of maximum stress. Militarily, the US can break Iran’s residual ability to contest the Strait; that is not the binding constraint. The point is to delay that act. By allowing a closure or semi‑closure to bite, Trump ensures that the immediate pain is concentrated in exactly the jurisdictions that have most conspicuously free‑ridden on US power: the EU and the UK. Their industries, consumers and energy‑transition assumptions are exposed. In that context, his reported blunt message to European and British leaders, you need the oil out of the Strait more than we do; why don’t you go and take it? Is not a throwaway line. It is the verbalisation of the antithesis. It openly reverses the traditional presumption that America will carry the burden while its allies emote from the sidelines. In this dialectic, the prize is not simply the reopening of a chokepoint. The prize is a reordered system in which the United States effectively arbitrages and controls the global flow of oil. A world in which US‑aligned production in the Americas plus a discretionary capability to secure,or not secure, Hormuz places Washington at the centre of the hydrocarbon chessboard. For that strategic end, a rapid restoration of the old status quo would be counterproductive. A quick, surgical “fix” of Hormuz would short‑circuit the dialectic. If Trump rapidly crushed Iran’s remaining coastal capabilities, swept the mines and escorted tankers back through the Strait, Europe and the UK would heave a sigh of relief and return to business as usual: underfunded militaries, maximalist green posturing and performative disdain for US power, all underwritten by that same power. The contradiction between their dependence and their posture would remain latent. By declining to supply the synthesis on demand, and by explicitly telling London and Brussels to “go and take it” themselves, Trump forces a reckoning. European and British leaders must confront the fact that their energy systems, their industrial bases and their geopolitical sermons all rest on an American hard‑power foundation they neither finance nor politically respect. The longer the contradiction is allowed to unfold, the stronger the eventual synthesis can be: a new order in which access to secure flows, Hormuz, Venezuela and beyond, is explicitly conditional on real contributions, not assumed as a right. In that sense, the delay in “taking” the Strait, and the challenge issued to US allies to do it themselves, is not indecision. It is the negative moment Hegel insisted was necessary for history to move. Only by withholding the old guarantee, and by saying so out loud to those who depended on it, can Trump hope to end the free ride.