Cryptoniwsa. eth

814 posts

Cryptoniwsa. eth

Cryptoniwsa. eth

@Cryptoniwsa

Just an observer. No taking sides.

Mars Tham gia Kasım 2020
123 Đang theo dõi61 Người theo dõi
Tweet ghim
Cryptoniwsa. eth
Cryptoniwsa. eth@Cryptoniwsa·
It seems like Elon Musk and Donald Trump are on a collision course. They might not know it now but it's going to be an ugly breakup in the coming months.
English
1
0
8
507
Cryptoniwsa. eth
Cryptoniwsa. eth@Cryptoniwsa·
@rookie_of_Ph @turtledotxyz @chainlink Lz can never guarantee security as it shifts part of the responsibility to the protocol using it. And from the Kelp exploit we saw how quickly Lz shifted the blame to the protocol rather than addressing their failure.
English
0
0
3
76
Turtle
Turtle@turtledotxyz·
Following the $292M LayerZero exploit, Turtle has updated its due diligence framework: • Assets relying on configurable, ad-hoc bridging are priced with a haircut • Cross-chain tokens integrated with @Chainlink CCIP are preferred The haircut accounts for the additional monitoring burden capital allocators carry when verifier configurations can shift ad hoc. CCIP's secure-by-default cross-chain infrastructure is the gold standard for institutional liquidity in internet capital markets. It lets allocators quantify and price risk with precision, and is the recommended solution for issuers. When issuers ship on secure-by-default infrastructure, Turtle can: • Eliminate single points of failure • Price risk without constant manual review • Compress time-to-deal • Quote on the most favorable terms Read the full updated framework:
Turtle@turtledotxyz

x.com/i/article/2057…

English
26
40
215
63.5K
WazirX: India Ka Bitcoin Exchange
Happy Bitcoin Pizza Day, everyone 🍕 To mark the 16th anniversary, we’re running a quick pizza-slice challenge. 1️⃣ Follow @WazirXIndia 2️⃣ Repost this post and tag 2 friends 3️⃣ Count the number of 🍕 slices in the video and reply using #BitcoinPizzaDay 5 lucky winners will win ₹500 each 🥳
English
240
210
321
6.4K
WazirX: India Ka Bitcoin Exchange
today’s agenda: » stack sats » order pizza » reply with "🍕" to everyone who knows what day it is
English
54
1
115
1.8K
Cryptoniwsa. eth
Cryptoniwsa. eth@Cryptoniwsa·
@henryksarat All this does is enables L0 to blame the client rather than take any accountability in case of any failures.
English
0
0
1
7
Henryk Sarat
Henryk Sarat@henryksarat·
Kudos to LayerZero for publishing such a transparent report, including third-party audits. This is the kind of disclosure that makes the whole ecosystem stronger. Wild that the malware was delivered via a GitHub repo, and exactly why you can't trust a single source or single binary. No matter how clean anyone's opsec is, mistakes happen. Diversity is key here. LayerZero gives apps sovereignty over their security model through customizable DVNs. Each DVN has its own infrastructure, ops, implementation, and security assumptions, which makes it materially harder for an attacker to compromise multiple independent verifiers at once. Apps can require their own DVN in the verification quorum rather than fully inheriting a managed trust model, and operators can include custom code unique to them to strengthen security further. That flexibility is a massive architectural difference. People keep comparing LayerZero and CCIP at a superficial level. They're both good technologies, just different. Hard to see that unless you're actually in the weeds. The KelpDAO incident was unfortunate, but it was a 1/1 DVN configuration. Whatever happened there specifically didn't use the main architectural advantage LayerZero offers. If a Google DVN, or any second operator, had been added for a 2/2 or 3/3, we probably wouldn't be having this conversation.
LayerZero@LayerZero_Core

We’re sharing our completed post-mortem on the April 18th incident, prepared with @Mandiant and @CrowdStrike. We are publishing both an executive summary and the full report at the link below. Over the past four weeks, we’ve worked with hundreds of partners to help them understand their current security posture, and harden it where appropriate. We’ll continue this work, alongside taking additional proactive steps for the benefit of not only our partners, but also the ecosystem as a whole. We want to extend our thanks to our partners for their support and patience this past month. There’s a reason that over $12 billion has moved across the network in the past four weeks, and why the world’s most valuable asset issuers have stood by our side: they believe in us, in what the LayerZero protocol has to offer, and in the value of modular, isolated, application-controlled security. The work continues. And we look forward to continue showing up for the applications that trust us with their business, as well as the broader ecosystem. layerzero.network/blog/layerzero…

English
7
5
26
2.7K
Dami (the L0 guy)
Dami (the L0 guy)@rookie_of_Ph·
good analysis but a few caveats this is essentially a subjective opinion on the architecture of both protocols and arguments can be made for each you made a good point but the market has chosen with the data overwhelmingly in favor of LZ and it can also be argued that institutions value control just as much as they value security, they can’t have that with chainlink or if they do, it affects every other app in the network at the end of the day, the market ultimately decides and at the moment it’s still heavily favors the LayerZero architecture
English
2
0
6
442
Stacy Muur
Stacy Muur@stacy_muur·
Users are probably wondering why projects are still switching their crosschain infra from LayerZero to Chainlink. The reason is a philosophical difference in their security model: → @LayerZero_Core: developers pick their own validators and thresholds → @chainlink CCIP: 16 independent nodes enforced at the protocol level LayerZero's model is elegant. Each app picks its own validators, so a hack on one app can't bleed into another, but only if each app configures it correctly. The problem is that LayerZero permitted a 1/1 setup, with one validator and a single point of failure. At least now, the 1/1 configurations are gone, defaults are moving to 5/5, and Console was shipped with built-in anomaly detection. But compared to LZ, CCIP is designed to avoid this misconfiguration risk. You can't get it wrong because the protocol doesn't give you the option. Institutions will often choose less flexibility in exchange for zero misconfiguration risk. That's why all these protocols are making the switch.
Stacy Muur tweet media
Kraken@krakenfx

Kraken is deprecating its existing cross-chain provider and migrating to @Chainlink CCIP as its exclusive cross-chain infra to secure Kraken Wrapped Bitcoin (kBTC) & all future Kraken Wrapped Assets. Kraken chose Chainlink CCIP because it offers enterprise-grade infrastructure with strict security & risk management requirements, including: • ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type 2 certifications • Secure by default architecture • 16 independent nodes • Native rate limits, and more. Together, Chainlink and Kraken can help accelerate the global adoption of crypto by unlocking utility and distribution for all Kraken Wrapped Assets across DeFi. For kBTC customers, no action is required. More details on the migration process to follow on official Kraken channels.

English
46
21
199
32.9K
WazirX: India Ka Bitcoin Exchange
🥳 Congrats to the lucky winners: @dilse_anshu @mainhoonraool @ThisIs_AJITH @SharuHgm @AyushSawar Please DM us the following info before 26th May 2026: » Your WazirX referral code » Link to this tweet Rewards will be distributed by 1st June, 2026
WazirX: India Ka Bitcoin Exchange@WazirXIndia

Weekly $USDT/INR trading contest is here ₹2,50,000 up for grabs 💰 📊 Market: $USDT/INR 🗓 Timing: 13th May 2 PM to 17th May 9 PM We are also giving away ₹500 to 5 lucky people who: 1️⃣ Follow @WazirXIndia 2️⃣ Repost this post & tag 2 friends Read more 👉 wazirx.com/blog/highest-t…

English
19
8
26
2.5K
Cryptoniwsa. eth
Cryptoniwsa. eth@Cryptoniwsa·
@NischalShetty what's the update on locked INR in Wazirx? what's the plan? Be transparent. How much total amount is locked by the agencies? what's the plan if the cases continue to pend? it's been 2 years now. Crypto was at risk, INR deposits should never be at risk.
English
1
0
1
150
Nischal Shetty
Nischal Shetty@NischalShetty·
Have you tried crypto futures yet? What's the leverage you've used?
English
42
0
38
3.4K
Tenbin Labs
Tenbin Labs@tenbinlabs·
Tenbin is deprecating LayerZero & migrating to @Chainlink as its exclusive bridging infra. We chose CCIP over LZ for its defense-in-depth design & battle-tested infra unrivaled by any competitors. Tenbin assets demand the strongest cross-chain security. We will not compromise.
English
32
59
337
94.9K
Dami (the L0 guy)
Dami (the L0 guy)@rookie_of_Ph·
this is dumbest analysis i’ve ever seen of course it’s cope
jfab.eth@josefabregab

If we cut through the noise and dive into the numbers, @USDT0_to represents 60% of LayerZero's volume. There's clear appetite for cross-chain $USDT transfers and the market chose USDT0. What isn't clear to me is why USDT0 chose LZ. > Is it due to Tether's stake in LZ? > Lower time-to-finality? > Freedom to chose each and every verifier? > The idea of "owning the stack"? > Economic grants? Genuinely wondering, given @chainlink CCIP seems to preserve all of the benefits people cite for @LayerZero_Core, without any of the downsides. Sure, @tether didn't invest in Chainlink, and CCIP's time-to-finality is dependent on the source chain, but the latter reason is a feature, not a bug. That's what happens when your bridging solution adapts the role of a canonical bridge, as opposed to LZ. Regarding the last 3 potential reasons: 1. CCIP offers Token Developer Attestations (TDA), allowing integrators to attest themselves + any parties they want, additonally to Chainlink's 16 verifier nodes. 2. With CCIP, the integrators co-own the stack. With LayerZero, we've seen instances of unilateral decisions and deployments made by LZ, meaning integrators don't always have meaningful control over the stack (wstETH deployment on Scroll/BNB/Avalance in 2023, without a @LidoFinance governance approval). 3. If there are economic grants involved, that's fair. Although, keeping in mind that USDT0 is the only reason why LayerZero's volume is higher than CCIP's volume, I'm quite sure Chainlink would match and even up any grant. As the founders of USDT0 say: Numbers don't lie. > LayerZero was recently exploited by ~$292M. CCIP has lost a grand total of $0. > If USDT0 would migrate to CCIP, CCIP would become the #1 messaging protocol by volume overnight. > 60% of LZ's volume comes from USDT0. The market didn't choose LZ, it chose USDT0.

English
9
1
6
1.8K
WazirX: India Ka Bitcoin Exchange
Strong trends don’t move in a straight line. Sometimes they: ⏸️ Pause 🧲 Consolidate ▶️ Continue That’s where the Flag & Pole pattern comes in 👇
English
29
3
101
2.1K
Cryptoniwsa. eth
Cryptoniwsa. eth@Cryptoniwsa·
@CoinDCX CoinDCX, recently, has been very slow in listing new coins. Majority of the trending coins in CMC top 100 doesn't appear in CoinDCX. You need to up your game if you want to retain your customers @CoinDCX @smtgpt .
English
1
0
4
1.4K
CoinDCX : India Ka Crypto Coach
Make a move with the momentum on US Stock Futures in INR and win iPhone 17, MacBooks & Marshalls, every week.
English
22
154
1.1K
6.4M
Cryptoniwsa. eth
Cryptoniwsa. eth@Cryptoniwsa·
@brian_armstrong @rwitoff AI agents works the same way irrespective of whether there is an emergency. But people do it differently. They take ownership, react to the situation. show empathy, and our of box thinking. That's why you need more people and not more AI agents.
English
0
0
2
44
Brian Armstrong
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong·
Initial technical summary of our outage last night from @rwitoff below. Thanks again to all the teams that worked overnight to fix this. We’re already working on the next steps.
rob@rwitoff

Yesterday @coinbase experienced a multi-hour service disruption affecting trading, exchange access, and balance updates. Here's our initial read from Coinbase engineering on what happened, how we recovered, and what we're addressing. At approximately 23:50 UTC on 2026-05-07, our monitoring detected cascading quote failures from internal services that triggered multiple Sev1 incidents that engineering immediately began investigating. Customer-facing impacts included spot trading, Prime, International and derivative exchanges. Root cause: a thermal event (cooling system failure) inside a subset of racks within a single building in AWS us-east-1. We run a primary replica of our exchange infrastructure in a single zone, consistent with industry standards to reduce latency. To prepare for failures like this, we maintain a distributed standby, but during this incident, failures in the primary zone that were designed to be isolated were not, extending the duration of our outage. The failure cascaded down two paths: 1. Multiple hardware components beneath our exchange’s matching engine failed, requiring recovery and failover 2. Distributed Kafka clusters that manage messaging across Coinbase systems failed to remain available, also requiring partition failovers to new hardware brokers with many TiBs of data After isolating the incident: automated tooling drained ~10 Kubernetes clusters worth of related workloads out of the affected zone to stabilize internal services. Most services were back to normal within ~30 minutes of diagnosis. The two things we couldn't automatically drain: the exchange (dedicated hardware and storage) and Kafka (managed service that was designed to be resilient to this, with unique problems). The exchange matching engine is the core system responsible for processing orders and maintaining order books. It is a distributed cluster and requires quorum to safely elect a leader and continue processing trading activity. During the incident, infrastructure-level constraints in the affected datacenter left only a subset of nodes healthy, preventing the cluster from reaching quorum. As a result, trading across Retail, Advanced, and Institutional exchanges were blocked. Recovery required our oncall and engineering teams to execute our disaster recovery plan, restore quorum safely, and validate system health under constrained infrastructure conditions. The team built, tested, deployed, and validated the fix while continuing to manage the broader incident. Kafka recovery was a much larger scale operation. Our primary managed Kafka partitions process many terabytes of data daily and are designed with resiliency guarantees for uninterrupted operation during a datacenter failure just like this. In this case, those guarantees failed and required manual recovery. We again relied on disaster recovery procedures to recover stuck partitions onto new hardware (brokers) that enabled us to safely bring x-service messaging back online across Coinbase. During the lag, customers saw delayed balance streams which resolved automatically once replication caught up. No data lost. Once the engine came back up as part of our standard runbooks, we re-opened markets carefully: all products to cancel-only mode first, audited product states, then moved all markets to auction mode, before restoring trading on Coinbase Exchange. What went right: the team. Incident response across the company came together within minutes, followed well-rehearsed playbooks and used secure automation tooling to recover all services. We have a strong, senior team at Coinbase that worked through rare failure modes to recover all services. To our customers: losing access to your account, even temporarily, is unacceptable. We know that. We're sorry, and we’ll publish a full root cause analysis in the coming weeks 🙏

English
145
33
456
156.8K
WazirX: India Ka Bitcoin Exchange
We’re building for trust, every single day! Introducing Guardians of Trust, our long-term initiative focused on strengthening security, increasing transparency, and helping you stay informed in an evolving digital space. While we continue to improve how the platform protects users through trusted partnerships, we’re also simplifying what you need to know to stay informed. Starting with Bacche Bacche Ko Pata Hai, a simple, relatable series that breaks down the basics of investing, common mistakes, and everyday awareness. Episode 1 breaks down a simple truth: going "ALL IN" on one coin might sound exciting, but spreading across assets can help reduce risk. Learn more 👉 wazirx.com/guardians-of-t…
English
91
4
150
3.5K