ST-v-SW.Net: Trek. Wars. Pew-pew.

53.6K posts

ST-v-SW.Net: Trek. Wars. Pew-pew. banner
ST-v-SW.Net: Trek. Wars. Pew-pew.

ST-v-SW.Net: Trek. Wars. Pew-pew.

@STvSW

Trek & Wars tech, canon wars, #StarshipVolumetrics, et al. Originated: Trek as Post-Scarcity, parallel Lucas canon, & more ideas you've seen on YT & Wikipedia

Tham gia Ağustos 2009
396 Đang theo dõi651 Người theo dõi
Tweet ghim
ST-v-SW.Net: Trek. Wars. Pew-pew.
Here's a "pinned tweet" thread because I want to pin more than one.
ST-v-SW.Net: Trek. Wars. Pew-pew.@STvSW

@EAFPW_Official @Commodore256 @AndrewCFrancis The 1964-2005 live-action productions are the #StarTrek Original Universe. That's TOS, TNG, DS9, VOY, ENT, the TMP films through TUC, and the TNG films. (Jeri Taylor also canonized her two VOY backstory novels. No one of higher rank ever disputed it, but many ignore them.)

English
1
2
5
3.3K
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
For decades, many scientists assumed that serial cloning — the repeated cloning of clones — could theoretically continue indefinitely. A landmark 20-year experiment has now demonstrated that this is not the case. Researchers found that successive rounds of somatic cell nuclear transfer lead to the progressive accumulation of genetic mutations, eventually creating insurmountable barriers to further cloning. The study, conducted by Teruhiko Wakayama and colleagues at the University of Yamanashi in Japan, began in 2005 using cells from a single female mouse. Over nearly two decades, the team produced more than 1,200 cloned mice across 58 generations. Early generations appeared healthy, with cloning success rates even improving slightly in the first 25–26 rounds. However, from around the 27th generation onward, success rates began to decline steadily. By the 57th generation, the average success rate had fallen to just 0.6%. All mice from the 58th generation died within a day of birth due to severe genomic instability. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that each round of cloning introduced new mutations at a rate approximately three times higher than in naturally mated mice. These included an accumulation of single-nucleotide variants and large structural abnormalities, such as chromosomal losses and translocations. Unlike sexual reproduction, which benefits from natural DNA repair and recombination mechanisms during meiosis, cloning bypasses these processes, allowing deleterious mutations to build up unchecked — akin to the progressive degradation seen in repeated photocopying. Importantly, while the late-generation cloned mice still appeared phenotypically normal and had typical lifespans up to the 57th generation, the accumulated genetic load proved fatal when attempting the 58th round. The study underscores that, without the introduction of genetic diversity through sexual reproduction, long-term serial cloning in mammals is ultimately unsustainable. These findings have significant implications for biotechnology. They highlight fundamental limits for applications such as de-extinction efforts, long-term agricultural cloning, and conservation breeding programs. While cloning remains a powerful tool for producing genetically identical animals, the research serves as a clear reminder that current techniques cannot indefinitely replace the evolutionary safeguards provided by sexual reproduction. [Wakayama, S. et al. (2026). Limitations of serial cloning in mammals. Nature Communications. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-026-69765-7]
Massimo tweet media
English
58
135
699
64.3K
TrekkieTrekTrekker
TrekkieTrekTrekker@TrekTrekkie·
No one has ever tweeted like this for Nutrek.
English
3
1
18
836
ST-v-SW.Net: Trek. Wars. Pew-pew. đã retweet
Fantasy Galaxies🌌
Fantasy Galaxies🌌@FantasyGalaxies·
Count Dooku (Sir Christopher Lee) didn't hold back in this interview😨👀
English
34
584
7.4K
282.5K
ST-v-SW.Net: Trek. Wars. Pew-pew.
Again, this would be expensive and a technical challenge, but it's easy to imagine needing to hit a deep crucial target with only minutes to do so and no B-2 or B-21 for thousands of miles.
English
0
0
0
7
ST-v-SW.Net: Trek. Wars. Pew-pew.
@FilmLadd Responding: - it's a tungsten cylinder - 11.5 tons KE from 37.5% of orbital velocity retained (USAF number), no warhead - deorbit thrusters are old hat - re-entry guidance doesn't require fuel (ref.: SpaceX) Would I prefer a cheap drone? Sure, but this has a place, too.
English
2
0
0
22
ST-v-SW.Net: Trek. Wars. Pew-pew.
@FilmLadd - Minutes to hit versus hours - Contested airspace irrelevant - Precision probably favors B-2 - 11.5 ton KE of tungsten penetration (per 2003 USAF study) versus 2.5 ton MOP blast after penetration of X meters ... might be a draw, might not Would love to see some more data.
English
1
0
0
15
ST-v-SW.Net: Trek. Wars. Pew-pew. đã retweet
Lucy Biggers
Lucy Biggers@LLBiggers·
“A gallon of jet fuel contains 34 kilowatt-hours of energy in a package weighing six pounds. A lithium-ion battery storing the same energy weighs 250 pounds. That density gap is why every military on earth runs on liquid hydrocarbons, why every container ship crossing the Pacific burns bunker fuel, why every combine harvester in Iowa runs on diesel, and why every 747 landing at Heathrow runs on kerosene. The fact that nobody wages war over solar panels is evidence of their limitations not superiority.” —@Shellenberger open.substack.com/pub/public/p/2…
English
368
2.6K
9.6K
195.5K
Eric Alper 🎧
Eric Alper 🎧@ThatEricAlper·
High school gym teacher Leonard Skinner holds the latest album by a band of his former students Lynyrd Skynyrd.
Eric Alper 🎧 tweet media
English
93
936
23.7K
776.5K
ST-v-SW.Net: Trek. Wars. Pew-pew.
@DavidMKeyes "Our new creeping barrage is inspired by video games where one can just constantly remain airborne by shooting explosives at the ground!" "Doesn't that require 'god mode'?" "You shut up!"
English
0
0
0
139
David Keyes
David Keyes@DavidMKeyes·
🚨Breaking: Trump orders 24/7 bombing directly under feet of US soldiers so technically there are never "boots on the ground"
David Keyes tweet media
English
6
5
60
3.7K
ST-v-SW.Net: Trek. Wars. Pew-pew.
Sure, we doubled the cost for the driver, the fuel for the bread truck, the environmentally-regulated truck itself, the similar transport costs upstream for the wheat, the farmer's machines and tools, and the very fertilizer he needed for a suitable yield, but it's greed.
English
0
0
0
14
ST-v-SW.Net: Trek. Wars. Pew-pew.
Vilifying producers and retailers is an easy way out for the magic-minded. They don't understand what it takes to get fresh-in-bag sliced bread to a store and sold for a couple of bucks. It's just always been there, and always will ... only greed raised prices, amirite?
English
1
0
0
22
ST-v-SW.Net: Trek. Wars. Pew-pew.
Modern western civilization may well fall because people forget the harsh realities that prompted us to build it this way in the first place. In its place comes the magical thinking where {producer/retailer} can always sell cheap {product} despite regulatory and tax burdens.
Maurice Cousins@MDC12345678

To be absolutely clear, the looming fertiliser and food price crisis has not happened to us. We have done this to ourselves. In 2014, I worked with the UK’s shale gas sector and the fertiliser industry. Our warning was very simple: without domestic gas, you lose ammonia; lose ammonia, you lose fertiliser; lose fertiliser, you hit food supply. Ammonia is also needed to make... explosives - which are quite handy when you need to re-arm. Westminster, green campaigners and national media journalists scoffed. It was dismissed by anti-fracking campaigners as “scraping the barrel”. Then reality intervened in 2021–22 with the war in Ukraine. In June 2022, fertiliser producers went into administration because they could not secure feedstocks at viable prices. By 2023, CF Fertilisers (which acquired Grow How) announced the permanent closure of its UK operations. And now, in 2026, we are told the problem is Donald Trump and disruption to the Strait of Hormuz. This is classic obscurantism. Shift the focus to the trigger. Avoid the structural cause: domestic energy policy, climate policy (Net Zero) and deindustrialisation. And continue to deny the potential of shale and the North Sea. Our media and political elites do this because confronting the actual cause is too uncomfortable. Conservatives, Labour and the Liberal Democrats all chose, over time, to make this country more dependent. Not always explicitly, not always deliberately, but consistently. Sabotage fracking. Ban it in 2019. Vandalise the North Sea with the EPL. Allow energy-intensive industry, including fertiliser, to be offshored. Accept higher costs and greater reliance on imports as the price of policy. And if you are Ed Davey, boast to journalists that you are “proud” to have played your part in sabotaging the sector as Energy Secretary. SW1 can dress it up however they like. They can continue to point to geopolitics, wars, foreign leaders. But the chain was known in the 2010s. The risks were flagged. The capacity was allowed to wither anyway. Now the whole country will pay for it. See the @NWTaskforce briefing note from 2014 here: d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/nwenergy/pages…

English
1
0
2
36
ST-v-SW.Net: Trek. Wars. Pew-pew. đã retweet
eigenrobot
eigenrobot@eigenrobot·
re base vulnerability, i think even this is too little _everything_ is vulnerable take a minute to work through the consequences of iran getting some shipping containers full of drones into baltimore harbor and launching at DC until the ship was destroyed
cdrsalamander@cdrsalamander

The Military Gods of the Copybook Headings are unpleased with our approach to base defense. They will not be mocked. They most certainly will not be ignored. open.substack.com/pub/cdrsalaman…

English
29
10
182
12.3K