.qt

🫠

The fantasy of seizing Kharg Island has nothing whatsoever to do with any genuine military requirement or the current situation in the Strait of Hormuz. It is a tired, decades-old obsession cooked up and relentlessly peddled by Israeli strategists, their captive think tanks, and the usual chorus of Zionist lobbyists and warmongering “experts.” This is purely an Israeli project, born in Tel Aviv and now being aggressively shopped to Washington. As always, the United States would be the one left paying the price, with American lives, American tax dollars, American ships, and American credibility, while Israel reaps the strategic benefits and risks almost nothing itself.

@GasonHenda @RoshanKrRaii She disrespected her country, you fool.

@ZeroSumOracle @RoshanKrRaii You are a disgrace to your parent, infact your money should have flushed you out of her womb for disrespecting the prime minister like that. What a lowlife human being

My whole feed is just Japanese people cooking their PM for Trump ’s bootlicking 🔥

Trump is going to lose in Iran. Bush had 35 countries in 1991 and still needed six months to plan it. Trump has Fox News and a Truth Social account. The coalition that liberated Kuwait was built on diplomacy, patience, and allies who actually trusted each other. This one was built on insults. History doesn’t repeat. But it does laugh.

NATO has fled Iraq. The Resistance is restoring the Sovereignty of Iraq.

Iran has kept the Straight of Hormuz toll-free for decades despite being vilified, sanctioned, and Isolated. Egypt charges $300,000 – $700,000+ per transit through the Suez Canal. Ultra-large container ships or tankers can exceed $1 million. Panama charges $150,000 – $450,000 per transit. Large Neopanamax ships cost up to $500,000+ to pass the Panama Canal. Turkey charges fees for the Bosporus Strait. Canada charges fees for the St Lawrence Seaway. The United States charges for the St Lawrence Seaway. But Iran is a bad country.

Take note. Argentina is whiter than 95% of European countries.

@Beskidsen @GarbageHuman24

@GarbageHuman24 Not only is this Ai but you're bragging about white Ai prostitutes

We are men and women of principles. Iranians do not sneak attack adversaries while engaged in dialogue. Only when attacked do we powerfully respond. We have intelligence on Israeli plans to strike infrastructure. Once again: ZERO restraint if our infrastructure is attacked.

BREAKING - Switzerland will not export war materiel to US during Mideast conflict: government

No tankers loaded with crude oil have sailed through Hormuz in the past 24 hours. Source: Reuters

And they’re 100% right to be angry. Trump literally joked about Pearl Harbor, the attack that started the war between Japan and America, right in front of Japan’s leader. He said it like it was funny. And Sanae Takaichi? She just sat there. Smiling. Shocked face. No words. Nothing. This is not being polite. This is Japan looking very weak in front of the whole world. Japan already gives America: 👉military bases 👉a lot of money for weapons 👉support in every American war And when Trump insults Japan’s history in public? The Prime Minister says… nothing. That’s embarrassing.

By far...

Trump and Netanyahu see the same mirages as Saddam On September 22, 1980, Saddam Hussein assembled a force of 50,000-70,000 men, 2,500-3,000 tanks, IFVs and APCs, supported by about 120-150 aircraft and 400 pieces of artillery/MLRS, and invaded the Iranian province of Khuzestan. The Iraqi army of the era was modern, well-equipped, and technologically superior. Capitalizing on the chaos sown by the Islamic Revolution, it surged across the Iranian plains. With such a massive force, it seemed invincible, who could have possibly stood in its way? The advance was rapid. In less than a week, the Iraqi tanks crossed the Karun River and surrounded key cities. The flat topography of Khuzestan favored the armored doctrine. Until the advance stopped. When they tried to enter Khorramshahr, the Iraqi vehicles got stuck in narrow streets and were hunted by Iranian militiamen with grenade launchers (RPGs). This forced Saddam to divert even more troops to the south, turning the place into a meat grinder. Saddam realized he would not be able to take Khuzestan in a rush. He ordered the total siege of Abadan and the street-by-street invasion of Khorramshahr. It was the first major tactical error. Troops and armored vehicles entered dense urban areas and came face to face with young Iranians firing RPG-7s from the tops of buildings. The result was that Iraq took Khorramshahr after 34 days, but at a human cost that broke the morale of the armored divisions. With the Iraqi momentum exhausted, the southern front turned into a “World War I in the desert.” In May 1982, Iran surrounded and captured 19,000 Iraqi soldiers in Khorramshahr. In 1980, small groups of Iranian soldiers and Kurdish militias used the caves and fissures of the mountains to fire anti-tank missiles from top to bottom. Approximately 20,000 to 30,000 Iraqis were killed on the southern front alone until 1982, and a large part of the tanks and armored vehicles were destroyed or abandoned. On the Northern and Central Axis, it was a mountain war. Iraq advanced to the foothills of the Zagros, but was again halted by numerous Iranian positions in that mountain range. Today the situation is very similar: Iran does not try to hold the border; it lets the enemy enter, because it knows it will have protected positions in the mountains to establish a war of attrition. At this moment, a CSG with about 5,000 marines is on its way to the region, where it should join Israeli troops to attempt an operation to liberate the Strait of Hormuz and take Kharg Island. Even if this force carried out the land invasion, where would it shelter? In the same plain that became hell for the Iraqis, or in the short strip of flat land that exists at some points of Hormuz? And another question: where will this troop group up in the face of Iranian missiles and drones? In any point of the Iranian Gulf lands where there might be success in its occupation, there will be positions in the mountains, drones and missiles hitting that occupation to the point of causing many casualties. Just as the US-Israel sees a chance of occupation on Kharg Island, Saddam also saw it in Khuzestan. In Iran, when the land is flat, it is also surrounded by positions in the mountains and ositions fortified with Iranian UHPC. To get an idea of the Iranian fortifications, while the high-strength concrete of the USA revolves around 100-150 MPa (megapascals), Iran regularly produces concrete of 200 to 400 MPa. If the GBU-57 bombs cannot penetrate a few meters of UHPC that protect the entrances of the mountains of the nuclear installations, the surgical bombing with GBU-72, which weigh only 20% of the GBU-57, and occurred in the last days in the mountains of the strait, is a myth. Putting feet on the ground in Iran would require a force that the United States today is incapable of mobilizing.

@TradersConf "I thought its something I can sell for a monthly subscription but since seeing that its profitable with a 90% win rate, I completely changed my mind." Thanks for the honesty. As I have always said, anyone selling courses or signals is not profitable. Argue all you want.

Hi mate, first of all. I am completely oblivious to programming or cording but I started playing around with a very easy to use AI program to code my own trading-bot. Initially when I started using it I thought its something I can sell for a monthly subscription but since seeing that its profitable with a 90% win rate, I completely changed my mind. I wont even share it with my closest friends. I deposited £100 to test it, its currently sitting at £217.34. This is for CFDs btw.

News flash from the future: Even a blockade of Kharg Island would not force Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. This (yet again) reflects a persistent misunderstanding of Iran’s strategic doctrine. For Tehran, control over the Strait is not just economic leverage—it is a core component of regime survival and deterrence. Under pressure, Iran is more likely to escalate than concede. Reopening the Strait would likely require one of two extreme options: either regime change, or a large-scale military campaign to seize and secure the waterway. Such an operation would take months and still wouldn’t prevent Iran from disrupting traffic through asymmetric means. There is no silver bullet to the Iran problem. The regime will hold onto Hormuz the same way it defends every pillar of its survival—with persistence and escalation. If reopening the Strait is the strategic objective, policymakers should recognize the cost: a prolonged, high-intensity conflict, and likely retaliation against Gulf energy infrastructure. #Ira

Iran's biggest problem is that it always assumed the threat of global economic collapse would act as a deterrent. It never factored in that the Israelis are more than willing to collapse the global economy, rather than admit defeat.

trump said he's "not putting troops anywhere." making you wonder what those 5000 ground forces on their way to the gulf are doing. (it's a surprise?)

@TheGeorgePu That's called leverage

Jeff Bezos is worth $200 billion. He's raising $100 billion to buy factories and automate them with AI. Not his money. Sovereign wealth funds. If it works, he takes 20%. If it fails, they eat the loss. If you believed in the trade, you'd fund it yourself.

Egypt charge tolls for the Suez Canal. Panama charge fees for the Panama Canal. Turkey charge fees for Bosporus Strait. Canada charge fees for the St Lawrence Seaway. United States charge for the St Lawrence Seaway. Iran kept the Strait toll free for decades and they are somehow still the terrible guys.