cake

@Neochange @acrocomia1977 @Ma_WuKong 中国から欧米のSNSやニュースサイトにアクセスできないのは中国政府がグレート・ファイアウォールによって遮断しているからです。

@acrocomia1977 @Ma_WuKong Y la censura, piensa que wn Europa están prohibidos muchos servicios chinos o rusos también. Al final cada país para la propaganda de una manera.

🇨🇳 Y China es el país con mayor número de propietarios jóvenes del mundo, pero no pasa nada porque tenemos el triple de renta nominal per cápita 👍🏼 Somos más ricos.

@FORTDETRICK2 @astraiaintel 価格が下落するということは所有者の資産が減るということです。購入時に組んだローンは払い続けなければなりません。

@astraiaintel it means to build less and sell less. what's wrong with that? china had enough houses. no need for more. all the money goes to industry sectors. japan will lose on industry side.😂😂

ECONOMISTS WERE RIGHT CHINESE REAL ESTATE SECTOR CONTINUES ITS FREE FALL !!! OVER A HALF OF TOTAL SALES VOLUME OFFICIALLY WIPED OUT, A TOTAL COLLAPSE !!! JAPAN WILL WIN! 🇨🇳🛖

@Aires752 @astraiaintel 下落を続けている物件を買いますか？明日はもっと安くなりますよ？

@astraiaintel More & more of the remaining 10% Chinese can now own their own homes as they’re affordable unlike many western nations

@BitCes1248 @DefiWimar 価格が下落を続けている状態では買い手はつきません。なぜなら明日になればもっと安く買えるからです。

@DefiWimar Looks good for a buyer who is looking to buy real estate.

🚨 BREAKING CHINA’S REAL ESTATE MARKET JUST CRASHED TO A 20-YEAR LOW, LOSING A 1/4 OF ITS VALUE. SOMETHING EXTREMELY BAD IS HAPPENING…

@ShangguanJiewen それはバブル崩壊後の価格下落が続いてる状態で買い手がつかない状態です。 持ち家比率90％はバブル直前の段階からそうです。 バブル崩壊後不動産購入数が激減しているので良い状態とは言えません。

Estimates for total unoccupied apartments in China (including sold but empty): range from 50–60 million. Estimates for total unoccupied apartments in the USA (including sold but empty): 15 million vacant homes. Here are the differences. In China 90% of adults own their home. In the USA, it's only 65%. In China, 80% of people have no mortage. In the USA, 50% of equity is owned by banks as debt. In China, there is virtually no homelessness. In the USA, 700,000 people sleep on the streets. Who has a "housing crisis?" I think there are AT LEAST 700,000 Americans who would prefer China's economy to that of the USA. What do you think?

@WillSmithSpeak @Rainmaker1973 中国のマグレブはドイツの技術を基にしてるものですね。日本は方式が違います。

@Rainmaker1973 Yeah then the USA are going to complain that China copied theirs! Oopsie, USA don’t have any Maglev… Looks like China is developing its own things after all.

China’s 600 km/h maglev prototype is ready after 5 years of testing. During the tests it could reach 0 to 600 km/h in just about 3.5 minutes making it currently the fastest ground transportation on Earth.

@ndyRoo2 @OptionsGuy3 @yabbanx WTOは機能していません。中国が自国内製造のみに補助金を出すのはWTOルールに違反していますがなにもできていません。

@OptionsGuy3 @yabbanx They can’t sell them if this is discovered. It’s called dumping and will result in WTO sanctions.

Tell me how Western car companies are going to compete with this? This monster cost only $ 24,900 cheaper than the 2025 Toyota Corolla 😂

@th9162 @list22543 @Peppermint_2525 それは民主主義とは関係ないです。専制政治でも民衆の意見を聞くことはあるし、施しををすることはあります。中国では「民」や「法」より共産党が上にあるのは憲法にもあります

@list22543 @Peppermint_2525 中国现在就是民主化，民主就是以民为主，中国目前对底层的帮助和改善有目共睹，而不是像美国一样对待流浪汉。

東アジアで、日本韓国台湾に中国まで入れて経済ブロックを作れば、それはアメリカの覇権の終わりなんだけどね。アメリカの基本的な倒し方なんだけどね。

@CleansedTweets 急速充電は充電設備側の出力に依存します。中国の平均的な48kw程度の出力だと同じバッテリーでも充電に1時間以上かかります。インフラ整備には莫大なお金がかかります。

I thought this was AI, but its not. They charge the EV as quick as filling it up with petrol. Why can China do this and the UK can't?

@KevinCastley ではなぜ30年前は今の100分の1以下、20年前は今の10分の1以下だったのですか？

If China stole our tech, why are they leading in patents? Right wingers can’t answer this.

@IpechMuseum @commiepommie 中国のネット上では政府に関してそのような陰謀論を唱えた場合、削除か拘束されますが

@commiepommie The Western mainstream media controlled by Epstein Zionists practise far more censorship than China, which only uses censorship to protect national security. The West uses censorship to protect the corrupt, war criminals, insider traders & pedophiles

🚨 Breaking: China just built the world’s first zero-carbon-emission direct coal fuel cell. Read that again. No burning, no steam turbines, no Carnot heat-engine limits holding everything back. Instead Shenzhen University’s Xie Heping and his team take coal, pre-process it and feed it straight into an electrochemical fuel cell. Chemical energy converts directly to electricity across an oxide membrane. Oxygen on the cathode side electrons flow out as clean power. At the anode you get high-purity CO₂ captured on the spot and turned into useful chemicals like syngas or sodium bicarbonate. This isn’t lab fantasy; they’ve been at it since 2018 solved the materials durability and coal-quality headaches and now have a working system with a fresh perspective paper just out in Energy Reviews this month. Potential efficiency smashes traditional plants. Coal stops being a dirty combustion fuel and becomes a structured electrochemical resource. And yeah the usual suspects will still scream “China burns more coal than everyone else combined”. But here’s the truth which they always dodge: China is installing more renewables than the rest of the planet combined over 360 gigawatts of wind and solar in 2024 alone pushing total clean capacity past fossil by 2025. EVs batteries and grids too at a scale no other nation even pretends to match. This breakthrough isn’t clinging to the past, it’s pure CPC realism. You’ve got massive domestic reserves you use them smartly while renewables scale at record speed. Energy security first pragmatism over virtue-signalling lectures from countries that import their problems and shut down baseload then pray the wind blows. The West paints China as the climate villain. Reality? China is the only player engineering its way through the transition with what it actually has on hand redefining fossil carbon in the process. Future of energy might not be setting stuff on fire. It might be extracting power through smarter structure. While others debate China builds. Here is the paper if you are interested in reading the science: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

@commiepommie でも「世界で一番二酸化炭素を排出している国」は中国ですね。二位のアメリカの2.5倍ですね。

@haugejostein さらに、中国の公表値には研究開発費や準軍事組織の予算、宇宙開発やサイバー分野での予算は含まれません。これは各国の軍事費には含まれます。実際の軍事関連の支出は1.4～2倍になると指摘されています。

@haugejostein まず一人当たり軍事費は人口が多ければ下がりますがその国の軍事能力を示すものではありません。また物価が低ければ軍事費当たりの人員や兵器の量が多くなります。アメリカと比較した場合、名目上の数字よりも約30〜60%の軍事費が膨らむ計算になります。

Equating China’s activities abroad with Western imperialism trivialises the extraordinary violence and destruction associated with the latter. China does not perform regime-change operations, assassinations, or coups. China has not invaded any country in the past 46 years. China’s military spending per capita is one-twentieth that of the US. While there are legitimate reasons to view China's rise on the world stage with a critical eye, there is no evidence that China harbours imperialist ambitions similar to those of Western powers.

@andres20ad 貴方たちは「中国のような経済発展」を一党独裁にすればできると考えている。しかし「中国で作る安い製品を買い、原料を安く売る」という従属スタイルでは中国のように経済発展することはできない。「中国に投資させ技術を移転させ最終的にシェアを奪う」これが出来なければ中国のようにはなれない

Cada vez que gobierna la derecha llega el hambre, la corrupción, el abuso, el alto costo de la vida... las mentiras. Deberíamos hacer como en China, donde la izquierda gobierna desde hace 80 años y la derecha brilla por su ausencia. Y miren cómo les va: muy bien, demasiado bien.

@OminiX_Br 少なくとも「中国で作ったものを安く買う」、「中国へ資源を安く輸出する」では中国式の経済成長はできないです。

@OminiX_Br ブラジルがもし中国のようにしたいのならば、中国に対して市場アクセスのために「資本と技術の移転」を条件にしその上で最終的に自国企業を優遇してシェアを奪う必要があります。それだけのことができますか？

No Fantástico, a Globo elogia a China por ter o mesmo partido há 80 anos. Isso permite planejar, começar e terminar obras. Obviamente, com essa direita xexelenta que só pede cortes, isso se torna quase impossível. A China tem cidades planejadas e tirou mais de 800 milhões de pessoas da pobreza extrema em 40 anos. A gente já fala isso de graça há um tempo, kkkk.

@shaunrein 中国の国家情報法は、中国国内にいる外国人にも適用されるのでそれは仕方ないですね。

Here's the reality. My own government, America, doesn't trust me because I've lived in China too long and gone native China's government doesn't trust me too because I'll always be American to them No point in trying to be a bridge. Time to focus on making money

@commiepommie EUのEV購入補助金は23年まで中国車の購入に使えました。それは関税を相殺してなお価格を下げることできました。中国がEUの自動車産業を破壊したのではないかもしれませんが中国車が破壊しました。

What an absolute idiot. It isn't China destroying the European automotive industry, it is the European car manufacturers who were too slow to adapt, to change and is their own fault. China simply started running when everyone else was deciding what to do.