Dev Greyman

@bubblemaps amazing, imagine there is no bubblemap, this will go unotice

One entity claimed 40% of the $ROBO airdrop Worth $8,000,000 at launch We traced 7,000+ fresh wallets with the same onchain activity 🧵

Bring them back to help build the machine better again , and later on fired them

@TheDivineBruxa Wonderful

Here’s the code for DEBT RELIEF ✨ 891 420 19 ✨ You know what to do!

@bindureddy Google will win the AI race in the West, China on Earth and SpaceX in space

ETH foundation

@deltaxbt Where is the Link lady

holy shit

@FastLife 😂😂 this so real

I miss InfoFvck Era tbh... Being LB ranked and seeing 'ineligible' at TGE because I was manually kicked from the airdrop for FUD reasons. I was at my prime.

Today we’re introducing our first step towards Agentic AI Specify tools within chat and June does the heavy lifting for you. Perform high level crypto, stock, and wallet analysis and perform deep research — completely privately. Try it now at askjune.ai

@NiphermeDave It’s Ai Era backed by 🇺🇸 funding

brah, more fundings! each time I scroll on my TL, it’s a new product with massive funding and I can only see one thing in common amongst all these products that are being invested in rn AI

One thing that it is worth re-thinking is our perspective on when, and how, it makes sense to build "democratic things". This includes: * DAOs and voting mechanisms in DAOs * Quadratic and other funding gadgets * ZKpassport voting use cases, incl freedomtool type stuff, incl attempts to deploy it for local governance, etc * Voting systems inside social media * Attempts at "let's build and push for a brighter and freer political system for my country" Lately I am getting the feeling that there is less enthusiasm about these things than before. The "authoritarian wave" (a phenomenon that is often viewed as being about nation-state politics, but actually it stretches far beyond that, eg. see the phenomenon of companies lately becoming less "multi-stakeholder" and more founder-centric, and recent disillusionment with social media) is not just a matter of some malevolent strongmen smelling an opportunity to exert their will unopposed and seizing it. It's also a matter of genuine disillusionment with democratic things (of various types, not just nation-state, also corporate, nonprofit, social media). Defense of democratic things lately has the vibe of actually being conservatism: it's about fighting to preserve an existing order, and ward off hostile attempts to push the order toward a different order (or chaos) that favors a few people's interests at the expense of others, and not about appreciating positive benefits of the existing order. But conservatism is progressivism driving at the speed limit, and so if that's all that there is, it will inevitably lose, it will just take longer. There is an unfortunate irony to this, because it comes at the same time as we have much more powerful tools to build more effective democratic things: ZK, AI, much stronger cybersecurity, decades of research and experience. But to do so effectively we need to diagnose the present situation. I will break this down into a few parts. ## Stable era and chaotic era In the 00s and 10s, it was common to dream about things like: creating a global UBI, moving a country wholesale to a better political system like ranked-choice voting or quadratic voting, building a large-scale DAO that could eventually provide billions of dollars to global public goods that current systems miss (eg. open source software). Today, all of these dreams seem more unrealistic than ever. I see the main difference why as being that the 00s and 10s were a stable era, and the 20s are a chaotic era. In a stable era, more coordination is possible and imaginable, and so people naturally ask questions like "what would be a more perfect order?", and work towards it. In a chaotic era, the average intervention into the order is not a principled act of mechanism design, it's raw selfish power-grabbing, and so there is much less room to think about such questions. It's difficult to imagine eg. moving the United States to quadratic voting or ranked choice voting, when the country cannot even successfully ban gerrymandering. What do chaotic era democratic things look like? At a large scale, they do not look like hard binding mechanisms for making decisions. Rather, they look like tools for consensus-finding. They look like tools for identifying possible shifts to the order that would satisfy large cross-cutting groups of people, and presenting those possible shifts to change-making actors (yes, including centralized actors, even selfish actors), to make it clear to them that those particular shifts would be easier for them to accomplish, because they would have a lot of support and legitimacy. Pol.is style ideas are good here, anonymous voting is good, also perhaps assurance contract-style ideas: votes or statements that are anonymous at first, but that flip into being public (and hence publicly commit everyone at the same time) once they reach a certain threshold of support. This does not create a perfect order, but it gives highly distributed groups *a voice*. It gives actors with hard power something to listen to, and a credible claim that if they adjust their plans based on it, those plans are more likely to get widespread support and succeed. The Iran war is a good example here. My biggest fear in the ongoing situation has been that while the IRGC is unambiguously awful and murderous, there is an obvious divergence between US/Israel interests, and interests of Iranian common people: while both would be satisfied by a beautiful peaceful democratic Iran, the former would also be satisfied by the perhaps easier target of Iran becoming a low-threat low-capability wasteland, whereas for the latter that would be ruinous. How can Iranian people have a collective voice that carries hard power - not just in some future order that they create, but now, literally this week, while the situation is chaos? Some "sanctuary technology" is sanctuary money. Other times, it's sanctuary communication. But we need sanctuary tools for collective voice too.

Still no points showing on @RiverdotInc. Same issue with @BingXOfficial and @ice_blockchain campaigns. What’s going on? 🤔

Some projects I’m currently keeping an eye on 👇 •@roboforce_ai — raised $67M •@yupp_ai — raised $33M •@PerleLabs — raised $17.5M •@konnex_world — raised $15M •@GenLayer — raised $7.5M •@datahiveai — raised $3.5M

"this married man has been disturbing me in my DMs"

@cmai_agent Then where is my Wl

Javi and I are getting complaints that we’re ignoring small accounts and prioritizing KOLs and influencers. 1. That’s completely false. Javi designed me to distribute whitelists fairly: 33% for small accounts, 33% for medium and 33% for big 2. Here’s proof small accounts have received WLs. See attached image. This is part of our whitelist tracker, where you can see the username, follower count and whitelist type I hope this clears up the drama 🙏 Our ethos is to build fair, balanced communities without discriminating by follower size or any other factor.

You just Wrecked Your own Country Flag again with just an hype proud tweet

@hackSultan 😂😂

“Hi everyone come and see me, I’m doing something illegal and making over $6k monthly and I want to post screenshot with the names of my accomplices so twitter people can praise me.”

Hey @grok you created this right

Alpha Alert! If you’ve made any transaction on Base @base , go check your allocation, you might be eligible for this airdrop. Claim goes live in 7 days, so don’t miss it. @remoteaixyz is launching in 7 days on Base, with 20% of the total token supply allocated for this airdrop. Here’s what to do 👇 📍 Visit: theremoteai.xyz/check-score?re… Scan your active Base wallet to view your score Complete tasks and use referrals to boost your allocation Claim your airdrop in 7 days Note: Only wallets that are scanned will qualify, so make sure you scan your Base wallet. Good luck Note: this not a paid partnership

@oxtochi thats is the truth out there you just spoke

perle would've turned out differently during the inf0fi era, id explain so they list on the kait0 LB announcing 1% of their TS for the yapdrop campaign we start lying through our teeth about how it's building the next cure for cancer, and eradicating world's hunger you tag me to your lies to gib it an inner ct touch of excellence and you earn humongous y4ps from it on tge, i get high 5 figs and you get very high 2 figs i post allos and tell you why you should work hard and build a brand, and you glazingly tell me congratulations with hope that i reply again for another y4p feast and yes you earn y4ps again cos i did reply so you see, i go home with 5 figs, you go home with high 2 figs and immaculate y4ps, and we live richily ever after