Name cannot be blank

2.3K posts

Name cannot be blank banner
Name cannot be blank

Name cannot be blank

@type0_negative_

Tham gia Ağustos 2025
761 Đang theo dõi111 Người theo dõi
Name cannot be blank
Name cannot be blank@type0_negative_·
@Sirhcdaso @john58696678235 @RedPillMediaX No? Blacks are sub Saharan chimps, Mexicans are partly white because their Hispanic(Spanish) ancestors. The only thing that seperates Mexican Hispanics from us is their Indian blood. Otherwise they're even speaking a white language. Nogs are totally different.
English
0
0
0
18
Name cannot be blank
Name cannot be blank@type0_negative_·
@john58696678235 @RedPillMediaX Retards forget the only silver lining out of the Biden era was musk buying x. That's it. Otherwise it's importing millions of nìggérs and a white genocide with brownoids holding us down and fucking us in the ass forever. Ziotrump was still the lesser of 2 evils imo
English
0
0
0
14
✝️ Strikermodel
✝️ Strikermodel@strikermodel13·
@type0_negative_ @AtRealBen Same reason there are pyramids across the globe, alk of which couldn't be built, even with modern machinery. The nephilim from before the flood.
English
1
0
1
11
Devon Stack
Devon Stack@Black_Pilled·
If you think space is fake but also don't know what this is or how to produce it, asserting "your truth" without research or investigation-the only difference between you and a "trust the science" stooge is you get off on being a nonconformist like a teenager with a nose ring.
Astronomy Live@astroferg

Here is a 2 hour and 8 minutes time lapse of @NASAArtemis 2 Orion spacecraft Integrity this morning from Florida, trailed by the ICPS! Captured with an 11" Celestron NexStar GPS and SBIG ST-2000XCM binned 2x. I streamed the capture of these images here: youtube.com/live/Q1Od2Mpn7…

English
81
28
528
15K
Name cannot be blank
Name cannot be blank@type0_negative_·
@OMApproach I saw it, I don't really care anymore. UFO fatigued with all this psyop bullshit narrative.
English
0
0
1
39
Open Minded Approach
Open Minded Approach@OMApproach·
Only 26 likes and miserable reach... I guess the opinions of people who’ve followed UAP developments for years don’t matter on X and its new “sophisticated AI” algorithm. Meanwhile, crypto bros will start talking about UAPs and get a ton of reach...
Open Minded Approach@OMApproach

Tim Burchett says he’s been briefed on the UAP/alien topic, and he said, “If people saw what I’ve seen, it would’ve set the Earth on fire!” He also says it might be connected to the recent disappearance of scientists and people who have worked for the Air Force on this issue. I don’t know if he is telling the truth, but the UAP phenomenon is connected to the Little Ice Ages, the Bronze Age collapse around 1200 BCE, the 4.2 kiloyear event, the 5.9 kiloyear event, the 8.2 kiloyear event, the 9.2 kiloyear event, the Younger Dryas, etc. It’s also connected to elites surviving the event and the higher beings that no longer have physical bodies—and this is connected to religions. Yes, people would go crazy, because if the elite is preparing to survive what is coming, and they tell you what is coming, people wouldn’t go to work tomorrow, even if the event is a 200-year process.

English
2
4
34
4K
𓆟
𓆟@moredoomscroll·
@type0_negative_ @zachwhite1690 @Black_Pilled We've all heard the meme arguments in Barts film. They just don't hold up under any scrutiny. "How did the President call them on a landline phone?!?" And so on.
𓆟 tweet media
English
1
0
0
24
Name cannot be blank
Name cannot be blank@type0_negative_·
@moredoomscroll @zachwhite1690 @Black_Pilled Sure am. Here's some nutshell theory NASA even admits destroying Apollo 11 mission film. Van Allen radiation belt would cause severe degradation to film. PR was a MUST because of the space race with Russia, NOT getting footage would be completely unacceptable for propaganda.
English
1
0
0
43
𓆟
𓆟@moredoomscroll·
@type0_negative_ @zachwhite1690 @Black_Pilled Just trust me brother. I was a on the same thing a few years ago and looked into flat earth and all this stuff and you'll realize the people who created these ideas are really weird freaks.
English
1
0
0
39
Name cannot be blank
Name cannot be blank@type0_negative_·
@moredoomscroll @zachwhite1690 @Black_Pilled They're going now sure, but they aren't landing. We haven't landed on the moon since 1972. And yeah a lot of the elements look fake and that would explain alot. Why Stanley Kubrick is allegedly involved in faking the film, why there's such skepticism etc
English
1
0
1
45
WordsAreWords
WordsAreWords@WordsRWordz·
I caught a 7 day ban for talking about eugenics.
English
5
2
22
728
Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbes@AshtonForbes·
I will systematically destroy anyone who tries to debate me. That includes PhD physicists. I have the peer reviewed scientific papers lined up, I know they hid fusion, and I can even point to the public advancements that are leaking out (see Pulsar fusion FRC).
𝙹𝚘𝚜𝚑𝚞𝚊 𝙱𝚒𝚍𝚍𝚕𝚎@joshua__b

The problem with a @EricRWeinstein vs. Lazar debate is that it's the wrong frame entirely. Lazar has always maintained he was a technician hired to reverse-engineer a specific propulsion system, not a theoretical physicist. Weinstein is right to scrutinize the physics—conflating the Strong nuclear force with Yang-Mills action is exactly the kind of theoretical error a technician would make when trying to explain something outside their discipline. But debunking Lazar's theoretical physics doesn't debunk the existence of the technology. It just proves Lazar isn't a theoretical physicist. If Weinstein wants a good faith debate on the actual physics of suppressed propulsion and zero-point energy, he shouldn't be debating Bob Lazar. He should be debating @AshtonForbes. Forbes has done the primary source work. He has connected the Navy's patents, the Invention Secrecy Act, the work of Dr. Hal Puthoff, and the documented physics of non-equilibrium plasmas. He has publicly challenged PhD physicists to debate him on the extraction of zero-point energy, and so far, the credentialed class has remained silent. A debate with Lazar is a media spectacle about a 35-year-old story. A debate with Forbes is a confrontation over the verifiable, modern legal architecture of technology suppression. That is the discussion we actually need.

English
59
30
235
11K
Name cannot be blank
Name cannot be blank@type0_negative_·
@AshtonForbes I can just imagine now. Ashton v Weinstein. Eric rolls Ashton and Ashen thinks he's winning by autistically screeching his fake points
English
0
0
0
45
Name cannot be blank
Name cannot be blank@type0_negative_·
@joshua__b @UAPorSAP @EricRWeinstein @joerogan Bob is a freaking retard and a grifter. Just looking to his personal life, his Bunny ranch, his 1 hour photo shop he just abandoned his first Hell's Angel wife that supposedly commits suicide.. all the while he's saying the area 51 people were monitoring his calls? Red flags
English
0
0
1
130
𝙹𝚘𝚜𝚑𝚞𝚊 𝙱𝚒𝚍𝚍𝚕𝚎
𝙹𝚘𝚜𝚑𝚞𝚊 𝙱𝚒𝚍𝚍𝚕𝚎@joshua__b·
The problem with a @EricRWeinstein vs. Lazar debate is that it's the wrong frame entirely. Lazar has always maintained he was a technician hired to reverse-engineer a specific propulsion system, not a theoretical physicist. Weinstein is right to scrutinize the physics—conflating the Strong nuclear force with Yang-Mills action is exactly the kind of theoretical error a technician would make when trying to explain something outside their discipline. But debunking Lazar's theoretical physics doesn't debunk the existence of the technology. It just proves Lazar isn't a theoretical physicist. If Weinstein wants a good faith debate on the actual physics of suppressed propulsion and zero-point energy, he shouldn't be debating Bob Lazar. He should be debating @AshtonForbes. Forbes has done the primary source work. He has connected the Navy's patents, the Invention Secrecy Act, the work of Dr. Hal Puthoff, and the documented physics of non-equilibrium plasmas. He has publicly challenged PhD physicists to debate him on the extraction of zero-point energy, and so far, the credentialed class has remained silent. A debate with Lazar is a media spectacle about a 35-year-old story. A debate with Forbes is a confrontation over the verifiable, modern legal architecture of technology suppression. That is the discussion we actually need.
English
6
5
40
11K
Steve Long
Steve Long@UAPorSAP·
So @EricRWeinstein just accepted @joerogan’s offer to have a good faith discussion with Bob Lazar on JRE. Though, having recently researched Lazar’s claims, Eric warns “…it may not go the way many folks want.” It’d be another black eye for Lazar. That’s why he’ll never do it.
Steve Long tweet mediaSteve Long tweet media
English
56
15
156
37.2K
Name cannot be blank
Name cannot be blank@type0_negative_·
@MiddleOfMayhem This kind of virtue signaling just makes you look like a bitch. No amount of white knighting would keep this chick from putting you in the corner on the cuck chair.
English
0
0
0
14

Khám phá

@Sirhcdaso @john58696678235 @RedPillMediaX @strikermodel13 @AtRealBen @moredoomscroll @zachwhite1690 @Black_Pilled