Name cannot be blank

2.3K posts

Name cannot be blank banner
Name cannot be blank

Name cannot be blank

@type0_negative_

Katılım Ağustos 2025
760 Takip Edilen111 Takipçiler
Devon Stack
Devon Stack@Black_Pilled·
If you think space is fake but also don't know what this is or how to produce it, asserting "your truth" without research or investigation-the only difference between you and a "trust the science" stooge is you get off on being a nonconformist like a teenager with a nose ring.
Astronomy Live@astroferg

Here is a 2 hour and 8 minutes time lapse of @NASAArtemis 2 Orion spacecraft Integrity this morning from Florida, trailed by the ICPS! Captured with an 11" Celestron NexStar GPS and SBIG ST-2000XCM binned 2x. I streamed the capture of these images here: youtube.com/live/Q1Od2Mpn7…

English
54
18
528
9.7K
Name cannot be blank
Name cannot be blank@type0_negative_·
@OMApproach I saw it, I don't really care anymore. UFO fatigued with all this psyop bullshit narrative.
English
0
0
1
16
𓆟
𓆟@moredoomscroll·
@type0_negative_ @zachwhite1690 @Black_Pilled We've all heard the meme arguments in Barts film. They just don't hold up under any scrutiny. "How did the President call them on a landline phone?!?" And so on.
𓆟 tweet media
English
1
0
0
14
Name cannot be blank
Name cannot be blank@type0_negative_·
@moredoomscroll @zachwhite1690 @Black_Pilled Sure am. Here's some nutshell theory NASA even admits destroying Apollo 11 mission film. Van Allen radiation belt would cause severe degradation to film. PR was a MUST because of the space race with Russia, NOT getting footage would be completely unacceptable for propaganda.
English
1
0
0
31
Name cannot be blank
Name cannot be blank@type0_negative_·
@AtRealBen Very wholesome. But a side question, why are there so many "shines" and "natural formations" found all over the coast of Japan and Okinawa. 🤔
Name cannot be blank tweet mediaName cannot be blank tweet mediaName cannot be blank tweet media
English
0
0
0
15
𓆟
𓆟@moredoomscroll·
@type0_negative_ @zachwhite1690 @Black_Pilled Just trust me brother. I was a on the same thing a few years ago and looked into flat earth and all this stuff and you'll realize the people who created these ideas are really weird freaks.
English
1
0
0
30
Name cannot be blank
Name cannot be blank@type0_negative_·
@moredoomscroll @zachwhite1690 @Black_Pilled They're going now sure, but they aren't landing. We haven't landed on the moon since 1972. And yeah a lot of the elements look fake and that would explain alot. Why Stanley Kubrick is allegedly involved in faking the film, why there's such skepticism etc
English
1
0
0
34
WordsAreWords
WordsAreWords@WordsRWordz·
I caught a 7 day ban for talking about eugenics.
English
2
1
7
84
Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbes@AshtonForbes·
I will systematically destroy anyone who tries to debate me. That includes PhD physicists. I have the peer reviewed scientific papers lined up, I know they hid fusion, and I can even point to the public advancements that are leaking out (see Pulsar fusion FRC).
𝙹𝚘𝚜𝚑𝚞𝚊 𝙱𝚒𝚍𝚍𝚕𝚎@joshua__b

The problem with a @EricRWeinstein vs. Lazar debate is that it's the wrong frame entirely. Lazar has always maintained he was a technician hired to reverse-engineer a specific propulsion system, not a theoretical physicist. Weinstein is right to scrutinize the physics—conflating the Strong nuclear force with Yang-Mills action is exactly the kind of theoretical error a technician would make when trying to explain something outside their discipline. But debunking Lazar's theoretical physics doesn't debunk the existence of the technology. It just proves Lazar isn't a theoretical physicist. If Weinstein wants a good faith debate on the actual physics of suppressed propulsion and zero-point energy, he shouldn't be debating Bob Lazar. He should be debating @AshtonForbes. Forbes has done the primary source work. He has connected the Navy's patents, the Invention Secrecy Act, the work of Dr. Hal Puthoff, and the documented physics of non-equilibrium plasmas. He has publicly challenged PhD physicists to debate him on the extraction of zero-point energy, and so far, the credentialed class has remained silent. A debate with Lazar is a media spectacle about a 35-year-old story. A debate with Forbes is a confrontation over the verifiable, modern legal architecture of technology suppression. That is the discussion we actually need.

English
53
23
160
8.2K
Name cannot be blank
Name cannot be blank@type0_negative_·
@AshtonForbes I can just imagine now. Ashton v Weinstein. Eric rolls Ashton and Ashen thinks he's winning by autistically screeching his fake points
English
0
0
0
23
Name cannot be blank
Name cannot be blank@type0_negative_·
@joshua__b @UAPorSAP @EricRWeinstein @joerogan Bob is a freaking retard and a grifter. Just looking to his personal life, his Bunny ranch, his 1 hour photo shop he just abandoned his first Hell's Angel wife that supposedly commits suicide.. all the while he's saying the area 51 people were monitoring his calls? Red flags
English
0
0
1
53
𝙹𝚘𝚜𝚑𝚞𝚊 𝙱𝚒𝚍𝚍𝚕𝚎
The problem with a @EricRWeinstein vs. Lazar debate is that it's the wrong frame entirely. Lazar has always maintained he was a technician hired to reverse-engineer a specific propulsion system, not a theoretical physicist. Weinstein is right to scrutinize the physics—conflating the Strong nuclear force with Yang-Mills action is exactly the kind of theoretical error a technician would make when trying to explain something outside their discipline. But debunking Lazar's theoretical physics doesn't debunk the existence of the technology. It just proves Lazar isn't a theoretical physicist. If Weinstein wants a good faith debate on the actual physics of suppressed propulsion and zero-point energy, he shouldn't be debating Bob Lazar. He should be debating @AshtonForbes. Forbes has done the primary source work. He has connected the Navy's patents, the Invention Secrecy Act, the work of Dr. Hal Puthoff, and the documented physics of non-equilibrium plasmas. He has publicly challenged PhD physicists to debate him on the extraction of zero-point energy, and so far, the credentialed class has remained silent. A debate with Lazar is a media spectacle about a 35-year-old story. A debate with Forbes is a confrontation over the verifiable, modern legal architecture of technology suppression. That is the discussion we actually need.
English
5
2
26
8.2K
Steve Long
Steve Long@UAPorSAP·
So @EricRWeinstein just accepted @joerogan’s offer to have a good faith discussion with Bob Lazar on JRE. Though, having recently researched Lazar’s claims, Eric warns “…it may not go the way many folks want.” It’d be another black eye for Lazar. That’s why he’ll never do it.
Steve Long tweet mediaSteve Long tweet media
English
55
15
158
33.2K
Name cannot be blank
Name cannot be blank@type0_negative_·
@MiddleOfMayhem This kind of virtue signaling just makes you look like a bitch. No amount of white knighting would keep this chick from putting you in the corner on the cuck chair.
English
0
0
0
10
Uncommon Sense
Uncommon Sense@Uncommonsince76·
They are bombing the hell of Iran not because it’s an intelligent plan… but because they have no plan. War-game it. The U.S. can’t open the strait of Hormuz, which is why they aren’t attempting it.. The threats to bomb Irans oil infrastructure are empty threats because all of the global oil supply would be affected… thus hurting the U.S. This is also why Russia and Iranian oil sanctions have been lifted.. They can’t nuke Iran because there is a risk Israel or someone else will be nuked in return. They can’t do a mass ground invasion because most of their bases in the region have been destroyed, and they don’t have the units and logistics there in the first place. They do have 5-10k troops and special operations there. They could try the insane strategy of taking Kharg Island, or taking the Uranium… This would likely have large losses.. but also would it even change the situation of the war if successful? And even so what would you do with Kharg Island if you took it? The reality is the longer the war goes on the more Iran benefits, and the more likely a global oil crisis mixed with an economic catastrophe is. The U.S. is legitimately hoping to bomb Iran into submission and that the “Iranian people will rise up.” They have to hope for this because there is no other way for them to win. Trumps nothingburger speech did not escalate or de-escalate… but intimated more of the same. The Israelis obviously want escalation… but the U.S. leaders have to know how Foolish it would be. Even so, the U.S. is so controlled by Jewish supremacist, that we may double down on this stupidity… We are destroying America for Israel, and at the current rate we will destroy the global economy in the process…
Fuentes Updates@FuentesUpdates

Nick says that Trump is ramping up the war with Iran while pretending to engage in real negotiations. "Every day that Trump pushes this out, we are being hurt more. So clearly there's some reason. It's not because there's a peace process."

English
37
120
756
31.6K
Name cannot be blank retweetledi
UFO mania
UFO mania@maniaUFO·
Bill Ryan's stunning revelation - Project Camelot🧐🤔
English
8
16
73
5.9K
Name cannot be blank
Name cannot be blank@type0_negative_·
@jakeshieldsajj Bro, they're going to send us white supremacists to the chopping block and let the blue haired troons hold us down and fuck us in the ass forever. Bolshevik revolution 2.0
English
0
0
0
12