
Name cannot be blank
2.3K posts



Here is a 2 hour and 8 minutes time lapse of @NASAArtemis 2 Orion spacecraft Integrity this morning from Florida, trailed by the ICPS! Captured with an 11" Celestron NexStar GPS and SBIG ST-2000XCM binned 2x. I streamed the capture of these images here: youtube.com/live/Q1Od2Mpn7…


Tim Burchett says he’s been briefed on the UAP/alien topic, and he said, “If people saw what I’ve seen, it would’ve set the Earth on fire!” He also says it might be connected to the recent disappearance of scientists and people who have worked for the Air Force on this issue. I don’t know if he is telling the truth, but the UAP phenomenon is connected to the Little Ice Ages, the Bronze Age collapse around 1200 BCE, the 4.2 kiloyear event, the 5.9 kiloyear event, the 8.2 kiloyear event, the 9.2 kiloyear event, the Younger Dryas, etc. It’s also connected to elites surviving the event and the higher beings that no longer have physical bodies—and this is connected to religions. Yes, people would go crazy, because if the elite is preparing to survive what is coming, and they tell you what is coming, people wouldn’t go to work tomorrow, even if the event is a 200-year process.



















The problem with a @EricRWeinstein vs. Lazar debate is that it's the wrong frame entirely. Lazar has always maintained he was a technician hired to reverse-engineer a specific propulsion system, not a theoretical physicist. Weinstein is right to scrutinize the physics—conflating the Strong nuclear force with Yang-Mills action is exactly the kind of theoretical error a technician would make when trying to explain something outside their discipline. But debunking Lazar's theoretical physics doesn't debunk the existence of the technology. It just proves Lazar isn't a theoretical physicist. If Weinstein wants a good faith debate on the actual physics of suppressed propulsion and zero-point energy, he shouldn't be debating Bob Lazar. He should be debating @AshtonForbes. Forbes has done the primary source work. He has connected the Navy's patents, the Invention Secrecy Act, the work of Dr. Hal Puthoff, and the documented physics of non-equilibrium plasmas. He has publicly challenged PhD physicists to debate him on the extraction of zero-point energy, and so far, the credentialed class has remained silent. A debate with Lazar is a media spectacle about a 35-year-old story. A debate with Forbes is a confrontation over the verifiable, modern legal architecture of technology suppression. That is the discussion we actually need.








Artemis II launch… caught in my glasses reflection

Bill Ryan's stunning revelation - Project Camelot🧐🤔

Nick says that Trump is ramping up the war with Iran while pretending to engage in real negotiations. "Every day that Trump pushes this out, we are being hurt more. So clearly there's some reason. It's not because there's a peace process."


Make no mistake, when the Democrats regain power they will conduct a Nuremberg trial for Trump and his administration. And by extension, MAGA. It will be sham trials, with only one outcome possible. Prison for the administration. Not hyperbole, fact.




