mark

@Sage123183 @XFreeze There’s a difference between teaching a specific subject, math, English, science, history and indoctrination. Teaching to think and learn, other than what to think. There is no “peaceful protesting”in Minnesota,but there is hindrance of law enforcement.

Remind me again, which side is attacking, suing and fining universities or the things they teach? Remind me again, which side is basically book burning in schools books they disagree with, or do not like? Remind me again, which side heavily attacks the free speech of the media and relentlessly sues and insults them? Remind me again, which side is gassing, beating up and shooting protesters who are peacefully marching? Remind me again, which President sues everybody and every organization which says anything he does not like, and seeks retribution and revenge every way he can? Go ahead….I can wait…………………………still waiting………………..waiting……………………””crickets”……………………………..still there?………………………….

Elon Musk: You can tell which side is the good side and which side is the bad side by which side wishes to restrict freedom of speech The side that is restricting freedom of speech you know, that would have been the Hitlers, Stalins, and Mussolinis of the world They had very strong censorship, very strong restrictions on speech. That’s one of the signs that they’re the bad guys In fact, a restriction on speech and large government is fundamentally fascist, obviously. So ironically, in pushing for censorship, it makes it very clear that the left is the side that is against freedom Freedom of speech is simply one of many freedoms that we should have as a civil society because ideas should win on the strength of their arguments. They should not win because they are suppressed

@elonmusk Can you tell us how big of a battery bank would have to be to supply New York City? And how large of a solar farm would be to keep those batteries sufficiently charged?

China electricity generation is still growing super fast, with solar being the largest incremental contributor, and will exceed America by a factor of 3X either this year or next

@gsd7373 @bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems If the ar15 has a select-fire switch the owner has a special license to own it. They are very difficult to get.

@vidiotfl @bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems Everything you said is nonsense. 90% of all AR-15s are chambered in 5.56. They will fire both .223 and 5.56. The barrel is not going to warp. Many currently made AR-15s are select fire. There are semi auto AR-15s and there are select fire AR-15s manufactured every day.

Must-read piece from Tom Friedman: “It is so obvious that only a pathological narcissist who insists on having his name on everything — from someone else’s Kennedy Center to someone else’s Nobel Peace Prize — would risk all of the above to seize Greenland, especially when you consider that we already have the right to operate bases in Greenland and station forward troops and missiles there. We also have the right to invest in extracting its minerals.” “If indeed America were a company, the board of directors would have responded to behavior like Trump’s by announcing an “intervention” with the C.E.O.” “Unfortunately, America’s board of directors, the Republican-led U.S. Congress, has been completely self-neutered. And so now, we the people, we the shareholders, are about to get stuck with the bill.” nytimes.com/2026/01/21/opi…

@gsd7373 @bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems The .223 and the nato .556 are the same physical size. They difference is the load size in the .556 is more. Which if repeatedly fired out of an ar15 would warp the barrel because of high heat. No currently made ar15s have a “ select-fire”switch.

@vidiotfl @bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems Lol. That is total nonsense. 90% of all commercial semi auto AR-15s are chambered in 5.56. They will fire 5.56 or .223 because its the same. I run both through mine all the time. Some AR-15s are semi auto, some are select fire. You dont understand AR-15s. The M16 is an AR-15.

@gsd7373 @bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems They use a nato .556 which has a greater velocity than a .223. An ar15 cannot handle a .556 repeatedly it’ll warp the barrel. Other than being semi automatic that’s one of the major differences than an m16.

@vidiotfl @bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems What caliber does the military use?

@punished688 @bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems When they made the ar15 semiautomatic exclusively and kept the m16 switchable for military.

@vidiotfl @bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems At what point specifically did the M16 stop being an AR-15?

@punished688 @bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems Do you possibly think that in 50+ years that the military might just have upgraded their needs? Since you’re posting 50 year old information.

@vidiotfl @bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems oh wow bing said so? wild anyways, let's see what the US Army has to say about it... apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/…

@punished688 @bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems Bing is nothing more than a search engine,a part of google.

@punished688 @bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems

@vidiotfl @bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems The M16 is an AR-15. That's why it says "AR-15" on the side in big letters.

@punished688 @bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems The ar15 is not used by the US military they are similar in function but the ar is semiautomatic, the m16 has stricter specifications. They may be similar,but are distinct in their design and purpose.

@vidiotfl @bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems .223 Remington was designed to kill adult human males.

@bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems A .223 rifle is for small or medium game hunting that would include an ar15 or a Remington.223. Too small for military use.

@vidiotfl @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems This is just completely fabricated.

@bobmister11828 @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems No it not,the modern ar15 is a redesign of a simple small caliber hunting rifle to look like a military rifle. A semiautomatic rifle is not an”assault weapon”. And the caliber (.223) is not what the military uses, it’s to small.

@vidiotfl @pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems Some AR-15s are assault rifles. The AR-15 was originally designed as an assault rifle.

@pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems An ar15 is not an assault rifle.

@vidiotfl @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems Use of assault rifle outside of military is misguided.

@grok @StephanieMay647 @BraddrofliT @frankdpi Still it’s saying “we investigated ourselves and found no wrongdoing except for the clerical error”.

Upon review of multiple sources (GA SOS, AJC, Snopes, Washington Stand), the unsigned tabulator tapes in Fulton County were not retroactively signed or re-examined individually. Instead, verification relied on 2020 audits: a full hand recount, machine recount, and signature match audits on absentee ballots, which matched totals and found no fraud. The State Election Board in 2025 confirmed the procedural violation but upheld the results as accurate. Diverse outlets note ongoing debates on implications.

100 % Truth. Remember - Fox paid $787 Million for LYING to their viewers.

@grok @StephanieMay647 @BraddrofliT @frankdpi A clerical “error”, I can find no verification that the tabulator tapes were at all looked at and the votes were verified. Beyond what “ officials find”. Results should confirm the votes were verified and affirm it was just a clerical error.

The Newsweek article references a procedural violation in Fulton County's 2020 election where ~130 unsigned tabulator tapes (receipts from voting machines) affected ~315,000 ballots. GA SOS Raffensperger calls it a clerical error that didn't invalidate votes—all were verified with ID. The county was fined $670K, but audits confirmed no fraud. Diverse sources (e.g., AJC, Reuters, Washington Stand) vary on implications, but officials find no outcome change.

@grok An excerpt form the article

The claim of 300,000 illegal votes in Georgia refers to a 2020 clerical error in Fulton County's certification process, not actual invalid ballots. Per Secretary of State Raffensperger, this procedural issue was corrected and did not nullify any votes or affect the outcome. For 2024, audits confirmed accuracy with no evidence of widespread illegal voting. Sources: AJC, GA SOS.

@grok @StephanieMay647 @BraddrofliT @frankdpi So the election process in Georgia with 300 thousand illegal votes were a bipartisan decision to have them counted?

Verified Voting is a nonpartisan group founded in 2004 to promote secure election tech, working across party lines per their mission. Official 2024 election reviews were handled by state officials with bipartisan processes, as noted in reports from Pew Research and Brennan Center. Claims of bias exist from various sides, but diverse sources like Reuters find no evidence of systemic partisanship.

@grok @StephanieMay647 @BraddrofliT @frankdpi Grok could the “official reviews” or “verified voting” been partisan?

Recent news in 2025 has reported claims of voting irregularities involving Dominion systems in the 2024 election, such as statistical anomalies cited by groups like the Election Truth Alliance in states including PA and NC, leading to lawsuits and calls for audits. However, fact-checkers like Reuters and Verified Voting state no credible evidence of widespread fraud has been found, with official reviews debunking many claims.

@pushnpprincess @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems Cute, he defended himself. And was proven innocent. Your use of this photo is misguided.

@vidiotfl @dollymad1812 @MikeLevin @RepJeffries @SenSchumer @HouseDemocrats @SenateDems